What's new

The dragon gets a bear hug

su35 142kn thrust
aesa
rcs reduction
no tvc

su 30mki +
3d tvc
145 kn
rcs
aesa
ew
(more)

You are comparing an existing Su35 to (as of now) non-existent super sukhoi .
 
.
sorry that is overkill ;p

Su-27M/Su-35
Single-seat fighter.
Su-35UB
Two-seat fighter and trainer. Features taller vertical stabilizers and a forward fuselage similar to the Su-30.
Su-35BM
Single-seat fighter with upgraded avionics and various modifications to the airframe. Su-35BM is informal name.[39][40]
Su-35S
Russian domestic version of Su-35BM.
Su-37 (future su 30 mki)
Thrust-vectoring demonstrator.
 
. .
sorry that is overkill ;p

Su-27M/Su-35
Single-seat fighter.
Su-35UB
Two-seat fighter and trainer. Features taller vertical stabilizers and a forward fuselage similar to the Su-30.
Su-35BM
Single-seat fighter with upgraded avionics and various modifications to the airframe. Su-35BM is informal name.[39][40]
Su-35S
Russian domestic version of Su-35BM.
Su-37 (future su 30 mki)
Thrust-vectoring demonstrator.





GO CHINA :china: DRAGON KI AGG KI FUNKAR BAHARAT KAI MOUTH PER

THANK YOU COME Agian:cheers:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
SU-35 is superior to your super duper next gen MKI.

That is debatable.

And also we don't need to have something superior to Russia but just our adversaries.
 
.
No official deal has been announced by China and all news coming out about any contract discussions have originated from Russian media. I'm not saying that it may not be true but it does look very much like Russia trying to stir up interest and publicity for its SU-35 platform. It's a case of Russia wanting to sell as oppose to China wanting to buy.
 
. .
why not amca and pak-fa two on one:sniper:
we would get best of both.But in case working on 5th gen tech we cant independently implement russian tech as we are allowed to manufacture for sole purpose=pakfa=but not for our indegenous productions like Amca.just like insas russians noticed tech breach from ak 47.
just like su30mki production in our country but we cant implement it on our home products like lca,or change it to other standards.
so in other words HAL is just another manufacturing hub for ruskies not a jv research center,merely a production line, out of their country.
So in other words we r just investing money so our chance of becoming self reliant on aviation is a far dream unless we show some gutts.
 
.
It's a case of Russia wanting to sell as oppose to China wanting to buy.

Russia surely have an interest to sell the Su 35, since they have major problems to sell it, unlike the Su 30MK (thanks to India mainly), but China surely have a major interest as well, because they neither have such engine nor radar technology so far and both is needed for their stealth fighters too.
 
.
SU-35 is superior to your super duper next gen MKI.

Super Sukhois and the Su 35 are similar in capabilities. Thats why we did not purchase them.
The Su 35 is more multirole capable though (AFAIK).

PS: Just leave your childish wordplays like "super duper". Your "arguments" wont become any better than they are, in fact it makes you look like a childish and emotional troll kiddo.
 
. . .
We want the Yasen class SSN, not that outdated piece of crap Su-35. :coffee:

Something that is better than anything you have right now can be outdated, but I can understand your interest in the Yasen class, would love to see it for IN too.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom