araz
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 9,291
- Reaction score
- 81
Samudra
Quoting from your own article:
Just because the 'aqd is a valid contract, however, does not make it a valid marriage in the eyes of English law, unless that is, the nikah marriage has taken place overseas in a jurisdiction where it is recognised as a valid marriage, for example, in Pakistan – or where it has taken place in a mosque registered in accordance with section 26(1)(A) of the Marriage Act 1949.
What you saw is the Islamic marriage or Nikah. What you probably did not see was the civil ceremony that took place before that.
This needs to be a separate ceremony which at the end of the day is what is recognized by the courts, not the Nikah held in Britain.
Secondly the jews came from the account given in the BBC news by a gentle man Member of the House of Lords where the Arch Bishop sits. Ican not give you a specific source but the news item should be reproducable should you want to challange me in a court of law. Just kidding
Regards
Araz
Quoting from your own article:
Just because the 'aqd is a valid contract, however, does not make it a valid marriage in the eyes of English law, unless that is, the nikah marriage has taken place overseas in a jurisdiction where it is recognised as a valid marriage, for example, in Pakistan – or where it has taken place in a mosque registered in accordance with section 26(1)(A) of the Marriage Act 1949.
What you saw is the Islamic marriage or Nikah. What you probably did not see was the civil ceremony that took place before that.
This needs to be a separate ceremony which at the end of the day is what is recognized by the courts, not the Nikah held in Britain.
Secondly the jews came from the account given in the BBC news by a gentle man Member of the House of Lords where the Arch Bishop sits. Ican not give you a specific source but the news item should be reproducable should you want to challange me in a court of law. Just kidding
Regards
Araz