Another BS from unknown source.Rumor says that WS-10C for J-20 has a larger propulsion than 10B at the expense of shorter MTBO or lifespan.
It's likely designed for supersonic cruise.
Maybe other aircrafts like J-10C could use that too?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Another BS from unknown source.Rumor says that WS-10C for J-20 has a larger propulsion than 10B at the expense of shorter MTBO or lifespan.
It's likely designed for supersonic cruise.
Maybe other aircrafts like J-10C could use that too?
As per news break by @messiach that PAF J10 will have Al31 engine with ToT
This is a big news, means PAF trust on Chinese engine is not yet achieved..
Secondly if AL31 is coming with ToT them RD93 will be also part of package as well.
Third point then there is higher chances that AZM or NGFA 5th gen will have Russian engine possibly AL 41
PAF J-10C News, Updates and Discussion
But that‘s for the WS-10C, the updated version used by the J-20A. In contrast to the C-model, the J-10C uses the less powerful standard WS-10B, which is supposed to deliver a thrust of 132kn. No worries bro it is hard to find anything. Yes bro always hard to find official sources in China...defence.pk
Su-35 doesn't use AL-31. Su-35 uses 117S engines which itself is different to 117 and AL-41.
The izdeliye 117S (AL-41F1S) is an upgrade of the AL-31F. SU-35 uses AL-31 or a variant of AL-31. Even AL-41 is just another variant of AL-31.
I was just quoting (((them))) and it was meant to be a jokeBro, it's okay to be chasing dreams every once in a while. Some of us do it too, but those are usually hypothetical.
If what you claim to be true means they will be in the Air in PAF colors before the end of the year.
And respectfully, a lot of things have "apparently" been delivered secretly to a number of bases over a year or so, but we've yet to see anything.
Every once in a while we outta go back a few pages, look at what all has been promised by people & ask, "So where are they"
Just move the ISPR offices to be inside the MOD.I have always felt that DG ISPR should be a civilian employee of the defense dept
Rumor says that WS-10C for J-20 has a larger propulsion than 10B at the expense of shorter MTBO or lifespan.
It's likely designed for supersonic cruise.
Maybe other aircrafts like J-10C could use that too?
Hi,
It means that the Paf has something else cooking with the russians---. It not the TOT package per say---it is more like complete service and overhaul capability---.-.
Someone with basic engineering know how would know that Pakistan industrial complex does not have the capability to absorb TOT of AL31 engine.
The real question is, why is someone still allowed to post unreliable hearsay constantly without any warning?No, it only means we have yet another unconfirmed and highly unlikely rumour. Nothing more, nothing less ... but for a car-seller this is probably beyond its understanding.
More interesting however is, this all is from a person with a great record of credibility before her pause but a not-so well one after her return.
Her claims, the JF-17 Block 3 would have dramatic changes on the rear fuselage, a wing with a wider span and different aspect ration - what so far has either been proven wrong or is still not explained and no-one but her sees these changes - is a testimony to this: Claiming something that is barely believable, ignore all explanations and avoid any discussion and then sit aside and watch the fun, how the discussion erupts.
And that you believe such claims - most likely only since I and others rate then as BS - is also more than understandable. As long as you can spit BS on others you hate, it's fine, but a person, who "agrees on all accounts" that the Block 3 will use an Italian engine and fire AMRAAMs has anyway lost all credibility here.
So why should anyone care what you say... ?
I can't think of a reason as to why not the full version, I don't think it's as secretive technology as say the J-20, it's a missile, and after the purchase of J-10C we may be allowed access to it. It would make a significant difference against the RafaleJ10C uses WS10B. Why should we pay attention to the undoubtedly WS10B? There is no doubt about it.
I'm surprised. Shouldn't our focus be PL15 or PL15E? There is a gap in the max-range between the two. Can J10C in Pakistan obtain PL15?
The real question is, why is someone still allowed to post unreliable hearsay constantly without any warning?
What even is their credibility that people follow along without question?
In fact I don't know but it seems as if some here are handled like eggs regardless what they claim or how they interact with others. And since I am "only" that arrogant stupid German, who only wants links and sources, so what I say is irrelevant anyway.
He is about as Chinese as German lager.
None of that ... just a "strange" German
Rupprecht: China hat wohl bis zu vier Typen von "Carrier-Killer-Raketen"
Für den Militärexperten, Andreas Rupprecht, hat sich auf chinesischen Übungsplätzen viel verändert. Es gebe neben zwei Flugzeugträgerattrappen und auch Modelle mit Sensoren und Elektronik.www.ndr.de