ARMalik
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2017
- Messages
- 6,046
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
Omg here we go...su35 now ...see what rumour mill does
I am looking for another 50 pages at least.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Omg here we go...su35 now ...see what rumour mill does
As a side note - the AL31F engines have some design flaws, which led to the crash of a number of J10's and also causes all kinds of bother for the Su30MKI fleet in India.
Russia has point blank refused to fix the AL-31F and is instead focussing on the AL-41 engine for the Su-57 series.
So, while the RD-33 has done a good job in PAF service, it does not mean all Russian engines are equally as good.
( i dont see PAF going for AL-31Fs at all. If you conside Azm aswell, then PAF may want to settle around a chinese WS-series engine that will mature over time and one that could potentially be used for the 5th Gen fighter aswell ..).
Let's see.
I would take this with a HUGE grain of salt ... her claims, the Block 3 would have dramatic changes to the rear fuselage, would feature a wing with wider span and different aspect ration and anyone could see it without giving any proof led me to question her credibility after she returned. In fact i would love to be corrected and even more to learn more, but like some other members who often enough pop up with quite unrealistic and unbelievable claims, she also refuses to explain. That's fine if she likes so but IMO not helpful to find the truth.
View attachment 807392
As a side note - the AL31F engines have some design flaws, which led to the crash of a number of J10's and also causes all kinds of bother for the Su30MKI fleet in India.
Russia has point blank refused to fix the AL-31F and is instead focussing on the AL-41 engine for the Su-57 series.
So, while the RD-33 has done a good job in PAF service, it does not mean all Russian engines are equally as good.
( i dont see PAF going for AL-31Fs at all. If you conside Azm aswell, then PAF may want to settle around a chinese WS-series engine that will mature over time and one that could potentially be used for the 5th Gen fighter aswell ..).
Let's see.
Its not the first time, plenty of such nonsense as claim quote from twitter or BS claim of insider info for many other incident.When someone make tall claims in ambiguous language in two liner statements and then never explain anything and disappear, it points to them being a troll or rumor spreader. These claims made are childish at best and shows the person doesnt know anything and just spreading propaganda.
What harnesses?The reason why RD-93 has performed so well is because PAF took over the responsibility of maintaining it. They went to France to get the capability of repairing harnesses on hot areas of the engines, as an example.
What harnesses?
Soon it will claim, China also transfer ToT tech for Type 003 aircraft carrier or 055 destroyer to PN."TOT has been made part of every defence acquisition/deal now", MODP Yearbook 2020-21.
2 squadrons of J15s have landed. 3rd one in negotiations. A squadron+ of JH7s have landed but are grounded due to engine issues. (Khafee leaks)
JF17 blk3 has structural changes with wider wings and bigger fuselage. Pakistan has acquired TOT for AL31. (Messiah leaks)
Troll level # 9999999
Soon it will claim, China also transfer ToT tech for Type 003 aircraft carrier or 055 destroyer to PN.
Well Bro if you want to nit pick , then he did say that PAF will do the flypast with JS-10 chinese aircraft . So do you think PAF will be doing flypast with PLAAF aircraft? Is that what you think he meant?
So PAF will get pilots trained to fly 'JS-10' just to do a fly past in a parade? And PLAAF will gladly loan their aircraft for someone else to do a flypast with?