django
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2007
- Messages
- 9,692
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
I wonder why "us inbreds" have a higher average IQ, higher average height, and the other higher "averages" if you know what I mean .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wonder why "us inbreds" have a higher average IQ, higher average height, and the other higher "averages" if you know what I mean .
This thread is way above ur intellect , kindly go back to shytting on banks of ganga playing ur national sport.Lol, Paksitan really is a joke of a country. They have literally nothing to be proud of so they wanna' pretend to be some aryan race or some shit. Clutching at straws much?
Land of the pure, more like land of the confused.
Pakistan is not a single race country. Like india Pakistan also has multiple ethnicities and race
Rumours are just that, rumours. Intelligence is determined by variance, this is why inbreds don't fare so well.
Yes but in Pakistan they cluster together to form one group highlighting shared ancestory.Pakistan is not a single race country. Like india Pakistan also has multiple ethnicities and race
Before i ask you anything else , answer me one question , in other four civilziations thread posted in seniors cafe you made a claim that some ancient sites found in india like dholavira ,rakhigiri were more advanced than pakistani sites harrappa and mohenjodharo etc.Let us suppose you are right.
Why do you think current day India is the heir of aryans only ,even if such invasion/migration took place?We have always maintained we are a mixed people in general with several regions having dominance of particular racial types.These racial theories you pakistani trolls obsess over are so 19th century.Our history -the history of india is history of all these people,the collective experience of their past ,whether it be the north east,north india,east idnia,west india or south indian people.We accept both the greatness and failings of our history,unlike many of u lot who are so ashamed of being associated with 'hindu' history.And just for the fact if there is no r1a1 haplogroup as your 'suspicion' suggests it would also mean modern day pakistanis have no claim to IVC either ,as they are abundant in that.If you are wrong,you guys are just clutching at straws and getting excited over what could be a bureaucratic delay(routine stuff in india) -either way you have nothing celebrate about,lol.
No updates on this for more than a year. There are rumors that all the samples tested have the y-dna haplogroup L-M20. No R1A1 - basically proving R1a1 is not local and Aryan invaders brought R1a1 (along with Vedic culture).
Before i ask you anything else , answer me one question , in other four civilziations thread posted in seniors cafe you made a claim that some ancient sites found in india like dholavira ,rakhigiri were more advanced than pakistani sites harrappa and mohenjodharo etc.
Lmao tho according to u dholavira is more advanced cause it has biggest bath well.
Anyways , so if india had more advanced ivc sites then why indian film maker chose to make a film on Mohenjodharo and why not on india found sites? He made the film in 2015-2016 dholavira, rakhigiri etc etc have been excavated quite long back so why he chose Mohenjodharo out of all tho india got "more advanced n developed sites"
So you are saying mohenjodaro is most well known and well excavated site , which means india found sites are not as well excavated and understood as mohenjo. So how on earth were you making claims that those not so well excavated as Mohenjodaro sites show they were more advanced than mohenjo?Mahenjodaro is the most well known,most well excavated and one of the 2 earliest.It is also one of the major sites of the IVC.Simple as that.It was excavated by rakhaldas banerjee as far back as 1922.
So you are saying mohenjodaro is most well known and well excavated site , which means india found sites are not as well excavated and understood as mohenjo. So how on earth were you making claims that those not so well excavated as Mohenjodaro sites show they were more advanced than mohenjo?
What does this mean? Indian lies getting burst?