What's new

Why Indian gov refuses to publish Rakhigarhi excavation's DNA results?

.
Lol, Paksitan really is a joke of a country. They have literally nothing to be proud of so they wanna' pretend to be some aryan race or some shit. Clutching at straws much?

Land of the pure, more like land of the confused.
This thread is way above ur intellect , kindly go back to shytting on banks of ganga playing ur national sport.
Noone is pretending to be aryan or anything but poor ganga and dravida indians are defo shamelessly trying to change their forefathers by claiming ivc ppl as their ancestors
 
.
The samples are not all with Indian researchers but also researchers from South Korea too. The proverbial cat is out of the bag. It will be published soon enough.
 
.
The boy in my DP is also Pakistani...He is my favorite Pakistani among others. He also asks what is my identity and why Indian government refused to publish truth

:D
 
. . .
Pakistan is not a single race country. Like india Pakistan also has multiple ethnicities and race
Yes but in Pakistan they cluster together to form one group highlighting shared ancestory.

29zwhn4.jpg
 
.
Let us suppose you are right.
Why do you think current day India is the heir of aryans only ,even if such invasion/migration took place?We have always maintained we are a mixed people in general with several regions having dominance of particular racial types.These racial theories you pakistani trolls obsess over are so 19th century.Our history -the history of india is history of all these people,the collective experience of their past ,whether it be the north east,north india,east idnia,west india or south indian people.We accept both the greatness and failings of our history,unlike many of u lot who are so ashamed of being associated with 'hindu' history.And just for the fact if there is no r1a1 haplogroup as your 'suspicion' suggests it would also mean modern day pakistanis have no claim to IVC either ,as they are abundant in that.If you are wrong,you guys are just clutching at straws and getting excited over what could be a bureaucratic delay(routine stuff in india) -either way you have nothing celebrate about,lol.
Before i ask you anything else , answer me one question , in other four civilziations thread posted in seniors cafe you made a claim that some ancient sites found in india like dholavira ,rakhigiri were more advanced than pakistani sites harrappa and mohenjodharo etc.

Lmao tho according to u dholavira is more advanced cause it has biggest bath well.

Anyways , so if india had more advanced ivc sites then why indian film maker chose to make a film on Mohenjodharo and why not on india found sites? He made the film in 2015-2016 dholavira, rakhigiri etc etc have been excavated quite long back so why he chose Mohenjodharo out of all tho india got "more advanced n developed sites"
 
.
No updates on this for more than a year. There are rumors that all the samples tested have the y-dna haplogroup L-M20. No R1A1 - basically proving R1a1 is not local and Aryan invaders brought R1a1 (along with Vedic culture).

no need for DNA tests I could have told you this without any study, look at Indian masses does it look like they would have developed a culture any time in their history...the ones who are still uncultured
 
.
Before i ask you anything else , answer me one question , in other four civilziations thread posted in seniors cafe you made a claim that some ancient sites found in india like dholavira ,rakhigiri were more advanced than pakistani sites harrappa and mohenjodharo etc.

Lmao tho according to u dholavira is more advanced cause it has biggest bath well.

Anyways , so if india had more advanced ivc sites then why indian film maker chose to make a film on Mohenjodharo and why not on india found sites? He made the film in 2015-2016 dholavira, rakhigiri etc etc have been excavated quite long back so why he chose Mohenjodharo out of all tho india got "more advanced n developed sites"

Mahenjodaro is the most well known,most well excavated and one of the 2 earliest.It is also one of the major sites of the IVC.Simple as that.It was excavated by rakhaldas banerjee as far back as 1922.
 
.
Mahenjodaro is the most well known,most well excavated and one of the 2 earliest.It is also one of the major sites of the IVC.Simple as that.It was excavated by rakhaldas banerjee as far back as 1922.
So you are saying mohenjodaro is most well known and well excavated site , which means india found sites are not as well excavated and understood as mohenjo. So how on earth were you making claims that those not so well excavated as Mohenjodaro sites show they were more advanced than mohenjo?
 
.
So you are saying mohenjodaro is most well known and well excavated site , which means india found sites are not as well excavated and understood as mohenjo. So how on earth were you making claims that those not so well excavated as Mohenjodaro sites show they were more advanced than mohenjo?

Its the oldest discovered along with harappa,and thus most well known and excavated.Others are relatively recent and not so extensively excavated.But technology level in dholavira,lothal,kalibangan are in many features more advnaced.Dockyard,ploughed field,and a step well 3 times the size of the vaunted 'great bath' of mahenjodaro.Maybe they don't get enough PR,but that doesn't mean that there are no significant sites lol.Maybe pakistani textbooks didn't mention them.
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom