What's new

Used F16's - EDA 50 ~ 100 Available

@Khafee

Navy Officers and enlisted men died that day---when the Atlantique got shot down by the indians---.

Because it was NAVY aircraft---the PAF did not give a sh-it about it and the dead men---.

If it was me---I would be having sleepless nights---and I would have prepared my team of procurements---to keep the schedule ready for a preffered aircraft the day we would be able to buy one---.

That is what is like a stab thru my heart---these criminals in the Paf had no plans---to go for the aircraft when the first opportunity arrived---. 16 years have passed since 9 / 11---and they have nothing to show.
My question is, given the ROE, that the a/c's should be within "X" kms of the border, the debris should fall inside the border etc, why didn't the PAF cut them off from the international border, and push them further into Pakistani Airspace, and then taken them down?

This question is not just for Mastan Sahab, Anyone with a logical explanation will be welcomed.
 
. .
In 2008 when the SU30 flew over pakistan---Paf was a chicken---only thing it could do was just take a picture of it from behind---even though it was well inside pakistan territory---it was scared to shoot it down.

Buckbuckbuckbuck----cockadoodledoo---Paf chickened out---even though they had to revenge for the Atlantique---.

The correct wording would be intercepted and escorted out of Pakistan air space.
 
.
Your tone was condescending and arrogant. Considering your lack of knowledge, he just rubbed your face in the humble pie. Enjoy!

My tone was certainly not condescending. There are many colorful claims made on these forums without much substance and the boldness of his claim was surprising. I simply asked him to cut to the chase and provide an evidence. Maybe you need to check the meaning of hyperbole. There is absolutely no requirement to know of every incident that takes between your country and India. But its the purpose of online forums to probe and question claims when evidence isn't presented.
 
.
You are one strange guy. No wonder the other senior members are always attacking you. But thanks for the link. This was an incident that I was not familiar with.

Hi,

I am just old and cranky---. That come with age.

My question is, given the ROE, that the a/c's should be within "X" kms of the border, the debris should fall inside the border etc, why didn't the PAF cut them off from the international border, and push them further into Pakistani Airspace, and then taken them down?

This question is not just for Mastan Sahab, Anyone with a logical explanation will be welcomed.

Pappy,

That is what kills me---why do you think I make these comments about the Paf---. They are insolent & arrogant ---. They don't give a sh-it about any other service.

It is a part of their history to deceive the other forces when they needed them the mpost.

You must be familiar with the karachi shipyard and refinery strike by indian missile boats in 1971---,

Well---hours before the strike took place---a PIA aircraft coming from GCC reported seeing missile boats being towed behind a frigate---he called in and reported to his controller---who then called and reported to the PAF controller at karachi air base---who called and reported it to the base commander---.

Now starts the treason---the gutless coward of a base commander---instead of initiating a recce aircraft right away and put it in the air----called the air chief---the air chief replied---"that is navy's problem--let navy handle its issues "--.

When later he was asked why he did not help---his reply was " it happens ole boy "---.

Him along with his family should have been hanged and properties confiscated.

Then with the pak army---they made a strike with a tank brigade inside indian territory and asked for air support---the same air chief refused---we cannot do it---.

The tank brigade was obliterated inside indian side by IAF---if the Paf help had arrived---there would have been massive dividends in that action.

And now coming to the Atlantique---. I was sitting here in the U S---when I read that news---it felt like someone ripped my heart our of my body---.

I wanted to know where the Paf was---why would it let the Atlantique fly on its own knowing the Iaf was around---why would it let it fly knowing that 2-5 indian aircraft were shot down at Kargil.

A car salesman like me knew that was an atrocious decision and should never had happened---. If the navy was insistent---then why did the air force not send and aircraft on their own to protect the Atlantique---.

And off course you would know about the biggest news of treason by an air force air marshall just before the hostilities of 1965---.

Air Marshall Asghar Khan contacted his indian counter part on his own---and conveyed that if he ie---Iaf does not use its air force during the conflict---he----ie---Paf will not use its assets during the conflict---that was pure blasphemy---how dare an air chief go about saying this on his own. Only a Paf air chief can do that and still be looked as a hero.

Treason runs in the veins of pakistan air force---. Navy men die heroic deaths without any fanfare and glory---army men die without any fanfare and glory---the Paf officers strut around in their flying suits off duty---.

The correct wording would be intercepted and escorted out of Pakistan air space.

Hi,

The correct wording would have been---they were shot down inside of Pakistan while making an un-announced incursion.
 
.
Pappy,

That is what kills me---why do you think I make these comments about the Paf---. They are insolent & arrogant ---. They don't give a sh-it about any other service.

It is a part of their history to deceive the other forces when they needed them the mpost.

You must be familiar with the karachi shipyard and refinery strike by indian missile boats in 1971---,

Well---hours before the strike took place---a PIA aircraft coming from GCC reported seeing missile boats being towed behind a frigate---he called in and reported to his controller---who then called and reported to the PAF controller at karachi air base---who called and reported it to the base commander---.

Now starts the treason---the gutless coward of a base commander---instead of initiating a recce aircraft right away and put it in the air----called the air chief---the air chief replied---"that is navy's problem--let navy handle its issues "--.

When later he was asked why he did not help---his reply was " it happens ole boy "---.

Him along with his family should have been hanged and properties confiscated.

Then with the pak army---they made a strike with a tank brigade inside indian territory and asked for air support---the same air chief refused---we cannot do it---.

The tank brigade was obliterated inside indian side by IAF---if the Paf help had arrived---there would have been massive dividends in that action.

And now coming to the Atlantique---. I was sitting here in the U S---when I read that news---it felt like someone ripped my heart our of my body---.

I wanted to know where the Paf was---why would it let the Atlantique fly on its own knowing the Iaf was around---why would it let it fly knowing that 2-5 indian aircraft were shot down at Kargil.

A car salesman like me knew that was an atrocious decision and should never had happened---. If the navy was insistent---then why did the air force not send and aircraft on their own to protect the Atlantique---.

And off course you would about the biggest news of treason by and air force air marshall just before the hostilities of 1965---.

Air Marshall Asghar Khan contacted his indian counter part on his own---and conveyed that if he ie---Iaf does not use its air force during the conflict---he----ie---Paf will not use its assets during the conflict---that was pure blasphemy---how dare an air chief go about saying this on his own. Only a Paf air chief can do that and still be looked as a hero.

Treason runs in the veins of pakistan air force---. Navy men die heroic deaths without any fanfare and glory---army men die without any fanfare and glory---the Paf officers strut around in their flying suits off duty---.
Thank You for your insight. Appreciate it.
 
.
Hi,

Treason runs in the veins of pakistan air force---. Navy men die heroic deaths without any fanfare and glory---army men die without any fanfare and glory---the Paf officers strut around in their flying suits off duty---.
Ouch sir. I know you enjoy to insult but come on....how can you say that regarding the air force.
 
. . .
i am not saying PAF doesnt want to, in past it has
I am saying they cant in current scenario, PAF ridiculously outnumbered and outgunned by IAF and gap is increasing exponentially
unlike navy subs that can sneak into enemy areas or army strategic strike cores PAF doesnt has anything.
i personally believe that any full scale encounter b/w Pakistan and india would start and probably end with two air forces very quickly.

a small air force can wreck havoc on multiple armored cores due to its cluster ammunition and long stand off GPS/laser guided bombs, a single aircraft with precision guided ammunition can do more damage than full loaded squadron back in 70-90s

i can be completely wrong here,
from how things look(lack of procurement in PAF with multiple procurement going on in pak army) , it seem pak army is very confident regarding current PAF

PAF had remained outnumbered all its history, and the difference was higher in past than now. I doubt very much that we are outgunned, it may be the other way around.
Also in three services, I think PAF is the least outnumbered with Navy the most.

You made a bold claim & questioning my age when confronted to prove your assertion? Hilarious!

The guy you are trying to argue against is a patented troll, and worse his knowledge of this subject is abysmal. He tries to cover this up with theatrics, hyperbole and throwing insults. Avoid such divergent and just put him on your ignore list...

IAF had been known for such pompous acts from I think 48 onwards, whenever tensions are high they will send a fighter or two to violate our airspace and than hyperbole it. The largest I think was between 1-4 sept, 1965. They flew more than 30 fighters in formation over Lahore, Gujrat, Jehlum etc. many a times. I have heard from seniors that the propaganda on doordarshan was deafening but orders were to wait...

Showing restraint in line with strategy either to not allow an enemy an excuse or permit him to sample your tactics in advance is not cowardice. Cowards are the filth which keep sitting in their chairs but throws mud at others.
 
Last edited:
.
1) Was your brothers last name "Awan"
2) If he was at DMW, ask him who was "Bhagwan"



Sir i read your post and was wondering what's DMW and who was bhagwan if you don't min




Air Marshall Asghar Khan contacted his indian counter part on his own---and conveyed that if he ie---Iaf does not use its air force during the conflict---he----ie---Paf will not use its assets during the conflict---that was pure blasphemy---how dare an air chief go about saying this on his own. Only a Paf air chief can do that and still be looked as a hero.


That's sad and shame...
 
.
Sir i read your post and was wondering what's DMW and who was bhagwan if you don't min

DMW = Directorate of Military Works

Bhagwan - A senior officer who thought he was God (nauzubillah), hence was called Bhagwan by his juniors. He was given per-mature retirement.

Ouch sir. I know you enjoy to insult but come on....how can you say that regarding the air force.
If you feel he is being incorrect about the incidents that happened, please feel free to provide the correct version.
 
.
Ouch sir. I know you enjoy to insult but come on....how can you say that regarding the air force.

air force deserved that.MK is a legend of this forum every word of his is a gem

There are keyboard warriors and then there are actual warriors. Legend word should be reserved for later. Labelling whole airforce as treacherous is an over-reaction not a gem statement
 
.
DMW = Directorate of Military Works

Bhagwan - A senior officer who thought he was God (nauzubillah), hence was called Bhagwan by his juniors. He was given per-mature retirement.


If you feel he is being incorrect about the incidents that happened, please feel free to provide the correct version.
The correct version has none of the mirch masala thrown in.

The PN Atlantique was flying a training/recce mission and was making a wider than normal turn but still within borders. IAF air defence commander for that day decided to try and get a medal by claiming incursions into Indian territory.
Normal procedure for both nations even in extreme high tension is still intercept and deter at border.
IAF was just unprofessional and that is that.The PAF had limited assets in the area from Masroor, and while the assets did take to the air; the ten minutes it took them made any assistance irrelevant.

One should stick to informed professionals for opinions on Kargil and PAF status such as ACdre Kaiser, and on 71 by people such as ACdre Sajjad Haider, ACdre Mansoor Shah and others who fought and commanded the war.
They have covered PAF Naval limitations very correctly and are better places to comment on where mistakes were made or not .. at least better than any forum based costume jewelry
 
.
quick question to anyone who has the/reasonable answer.

during the early/mid 2000's when the airforce was searching for a new fighter why didn't they look at twin engine (eft/rafale) options more seriously? sure the f16 blk 52's have cft's and 600 gallon fuel tanks good enough for New Dehli and back but still brings up the point. or is New Delhi enough ?
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom