What's new

Used F16's - EDA 50 ~ 100 Available

.
Your impression is not correct, and PAF history is there as a proof. In both wars, it went on offensive as much as it can.

There are two sides to plans/operations. Strategical and tactical, the two strike corps you mentioned of Pakistan army with past plans actually meant a strategically defensive while tactically offensive operations, the same was the case for PAF.
i am not saying PAF doesnt want to, in past it has
I am saying they cant in current scenario, PAF ridiculously outnumbered and outgunned by IAF and gap is increasing exponentially
unlike navy subs that can sneak into enemy areas or army strategic strike cores PAF doesnt has anything.
i personally believe that any full scale encounter b/w Pakistan and india would start and probably end with two air forces very quickly.

a small air force can wreck havoc on multiple armored cores due to its cluster ammunition and long stand off GPS/laser guided bombs, a single aircraft with precision guided ammunition can do more damage than full loaded squadron back in 70-90s

i can be completely wrong here,
from how things look(lack of procurement in PAF with multiple procurement going on in pak army) , it seem pak army is very confident regarding current PAF
 
.
That's not what he is saying

This is what he said: In 2008 when the SU30 flew over pakistan---Paf was a chicken---only thing it could do was just take a picture of it from behind---even though it was well inside pakistan territory---it was scared to shoot it down.

Where is the evidence for this?
 
.
That is an assumption, we have never seen that happening or not happening, we have never seen two nuclear armed countries go to war. the problem with India-Pakistan scenario is extreme paranoia, extreme distrust, and absolute hate for each other and being next-door neighbours with very little reaction time, no one would be in a position to exercise restrain, it would be a matter of survival or death, who fires first and most would have a better chance of survival. That is why I am totally against our strategy/doctrine of using tactical nukes to stop invading armoured columns, because that would invite a response and that is a failed strategy. Once we decide we have to use tactical nukes we MUST be prepared to fire a fist salvo of a minimum of 200 strategic nukes on all their 1st line targets.

You don't slap the opponent and wait for his response to decide whether to punch or not. Once you decided to have a go start with a knee and then don't stop until he is down and out. War is not a game of chess anymore, it's all out till one is out for good.

Well if you are baiting me, that I disclose how PA plans to react to a cold start attack, that will not happen.

As far as the TNW go, it makes the opponents control of enemy territory, not only difficult, but next to impossible. In a world, where the top 5 powers (besides a few smaller countries), know what the yield of an explosion is, it is very difficult for anyone (unless a retard), to misconstrue a TNW in to anything else. Plus, if they enemy is not expecting TNW's to be deployed, then they need their head checked, for e.g. any invading army knows, land mines will be encountered, same goes for TNW in Pakistan's case.

Pakistan's 2nd strike capability, and mobile TEL's, provide a very effective deterrent to anyone who is thinking of using high yield BM's. That would then definitely trigger M.A.D. So the justification of using high yield nukes, in response to TNW, does not hold water.

Best Regards
 
.
This is what he said: In 2008 when the SU30 flew over pakistan---Paf was a chicken---only thing it could do was just take a picture of it from behind---even though it was well inside pakistan territory---it was scared to shoot it down.

Where is the evidence for this?

Hi,

First tell me how old you are---then I will get the info.
 
. .
Kid---before you started to learn to walk and talk---life in this world was happening at its regular pace---.

Just because you did not know about it or were a child at that time---did not mean that the world stopped for you---.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4649336

You made a bold claim & questioning my age when confronted to prove your assertion? Hilarious!

I wanted to know your age to determine the level of your intellect---. Enjoy the link---.

All senior members know about this incidence---.

When the U S general in afg on visit to pakistan smirked and stated that indians can fly in and out any time---the pak general pulled out a gun camera photo of a missile lock from an F16 on one of those SU30 aircraft---and shut the mouth of that general.

That old picture should be here on this forum as well.
 
Last edited:
.
Kid---before you started to learn to walk and talk---life in this world was happening at its regular pace---.

Just because you did not know about it or were a child at that time---did not mean that the world stopped for you---.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4649336



I wanted to know your age to determine the level of your idiocy---. Enjoy the link---.

All senior members know about this incidence---.

When the U S general in afg on visit to pakistan smirked and stated that indians can fly in and out any time---the pak general pulled out a gun camera photo of a missile lock from an F16 on one of those SU30 aircraft---and shut the mouth of that general.
Both the incidents happened.

For me what is mind boggling is how the incompetent & corrupt politicians are nothing less than sacred cows, who loot, plunder, desecrate with impunity.
 
.
You made a bold claim & questioning my age when confronted to prove your assertion? Hilarious!

Hi,

Are you still here on the board---?

Both the incidents happened.

For me what is mind boggling is how the incompetent & corrupt politicians are nothing less than sacred cows, who loot, plunder, desecrate with impunity.

@Khafee

Navy Officers and enlisted men died that day---when the Atlantique got shot down by the indians---.

Because it was NAVY aircraft---the PAF did not give a sh-it about it and the dead men---.

If it was me---I would be having sleepless nights---and I would have prepared my team of procurements---to keep the schedule ready for a preffered aircraft the day we would be able to buy one---.

That is what is like a stab thru my heart---these criminals in the Paf had no plans---to go for the aircraft when the first opportunity arrived---. 16 years have passed since 9 / 11---and they have nothing to show.
 
Last edited:
.
Kid---before you started to learn to walk and talk---life in this world was happening at its regular pace---.

Just because you did not know about it or were a child at that time---did not mean that the world stopped for you---.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4649336



I wanted to know your age to determine the level of your intellect---. Enjoy the link---.

All senior members know about this incidence---.

When the U S general in afg on visit to pakistan smirked and stated that indians can fly in and out any time---the pak general pulled out a gun camera photo of a missile lock from an F16 on one of those SU30 aircraft---and shut the mouth of that general.

That old picture should be here on this forum as well.
Son,

Are you still here on the board---?

First of all, thanks for the links. I was not aware of this incident. If you could post the link to the gun camera, it would be appreciated.

Secondly, it's very disrespectful of you to refer to me as "son" and the ugly tone you have taken. I will advice you to refrain from this ugly tone or I will have to report you in the future. You should learn how to have a discussion without getting ugly & disrespectful.
 
.
First of all, thanks for the links. I was not aware of this incident. If you could post the link to the gun camera, it would be appreciated.

Secondly, it's very disrespectful of you to refer to me as "son" and the ugly tone you have taken. I will advice you to refrain from this ugly tone or I will have to report you in the future. You should learn how to have a discussion without getting ugly & disrespectful.

Hi,

You started up with "hyperboles" and not me---I just talked back to you in your tone---.

Between 2008 and now is like 10 years---so my asking your age is a normal question---. That was one of the major major incidence of that year---.

Now you can say---"my apologies to you MK in asking that question in that manner---I could have been a little polite".

As for the picture---do your own search---. It is out there---or one of the members here who is not pis-sed off at me might post it.
 
. . .
First of all, thanks for the links. I was not aware of this incident. If you could post the link to the gun camera, it would be appreciated.

Secondly, it's very disrespectful of you to refer to me as "son" and the ugly tone you have taken. I will advice you to refrain from this ugly tone or I will have to report you in the future. You should learn how to have a discussion without getting ugly & disrespectful.
Your tone was condescending and arrogant. Considering your lack of knowledge, he just rubbed your face in the humble pie. Enjoy!
 
.
Hi,

You started up with "hyperboles" and not me---I just talked back to you in your tone---.

Between 2008 and now is like 10 years---so my asking your age is a normal question---. That was one of the major major incidence of that year---.

Now you can say---"my apologies to you MK in asking that question in that manner---I could have been a little polite".

As for the picture---do your own search---. It is out there---or one of the members here who is not pis-sed off at me might post it.

You are one strange guy. No wonder the other senior members are always attacking you. But thanks for the link. This was an incident that I was not familiar with.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom