Pakistan says Indian ballistic missile system a destabilizing development.

[gslv mk3]

There is difference between locos and missiles - we even have mini-atom for you which nullified your cold start doctrine. This is what we call Sasta aur Tekaaoo

that show you still can't properly maintain a bunch of chinese diesel locos but still claims that our missiles are far advanced than India..

Pakistan has indigenous missiles - and nasar is far cheaper than it's counter measures. And modi-fied hindus like you looks good in pink color. Happy banning - hope it's permanent

Nasr is battlefield range missile,which cannot target any Indian city,and attacking India with a sub kiloton tactical nuke gives India enough excuse for taking out any Pakistani city with a nuke

And how can a BRBM/cruise missile evade an ABM?Pakistan should look towards a hypersonic/Supersonic cruise missile,Quasi Ballistic missiles or MIRVs to counter Indian ABM

 

[Sugarcane]

that show you still can't properly maintain a bunch of chinese diesel locos but still claims that our missiles are far advanced than India..

Ask same question from your own defense officials, who worried more of 60km missile than 2500km

 

[gslv mk3]

Chanakyans will always follow the path of aggressive hegemonism. The good news is that Ballistic missile defense system is unreliable and counter technologies have grown by leaps and bounds with far less investment. Even US ballastic missiles won't score 100% hit rate and won't be able to defend all their military installations and cities from a nuclear attack. India is a zillion years behind. BMD is astronomically expensive and in order to counter a sophisticated missile force it would require a large enough no. to put up a face saving show.
PAK needs to invest in offensive technologies like Cruise missiles, countermeasures such as chaff and flares, reduced RCS etc. These will be much cheaper alternative and will render the Indian BMD useless while milking them dry. Besides India borders PAK and reaction time to incoming PAK attack will be next to impossible.

look who is talking...haha a bangladeshi

Ask same question from your own defense officials, who worried more of 60km missile than 2500km

What about Prahar?

 

[Sugarcane]

What about Prahar?

Nothing special, as we are now capable of frying bharat in case of any misadventure - All you can do is bully countries like Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka etc.

 

[Goodbye!]

Nothing special, as we are now capable of frying bharat in case of any misadventure - All you can do is bully countries like Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka etc.

If you fry bharat, you may find yourself on the menu. This is the same country that repulsed your aggression in 1947-48, 1965, 1999. 1971 was an altogether different story. The funny thing is after each of those wars you promised to mend ways, resolving to solve problem through dialogue.

 

[gslv mk3]

Nothing special, as we are now capable of frying bharat in case of any misadventure - All you can do is bully countries like Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka etc.

What is the difference between Prahaar and Nasr,Both are BRBMs except that former has more Range?
And please look at missiles like Shaurya and Brahmos that cant be intercepted by ABMs-Of course that doesnt matter as you doesnt have any ABM.

Frying Bharat?hahaha..Pakistani delusions
with what?60 km rage BRBMs?
And in case of a Nuclear war India would definitely survive but Pakistan will be totaly destroyed....

 

[Sugarcane]

If you fry bharat, you may find yourself on the menu. This is the same country that repulsed your aggression in 1947-48, 1965, 1999. 1971 was an altogether different story. The funny thing is after each of those wars you promised to mend ways, resolving to solve problem through dialogue.

What is the difference between Prahaar and Nasr,Both are BRBMs except that former has more Range?
And please look at missiles like Shaurya and Brahmos that cant be intercepted by ABMs-Of course that doesnt matter as you doesnt have any ABM.

Frying Bharat?hahaha..Pakistani delusions
with what?60 km rage BRBMs?
And in case of a Nuclear war India would definitely survive but Pakistan will be totaly destroyed....

60km is for your army sitting on borders as we don't want them to complain that they haven't received their due share, for rest of India we have enough nukes & missiles to hit - and we don't need ABM, because we don't have no-first use policy, when we decided to use nukes than it will empty our stock piles in one strike -

 

[gslv mk3]

60km is for your army sitting on borders as we don't want them to complain that they haven't received their due share,

And India would retaliate with full force if we are ever attacked with Nukes,thats our policy.And probably the target would be Lahore/Karachi.And dont forget that Prahar has double the range of Nasr.

for rest of India we have enough nukes & missiles to hit - and we don't need ABM, because we don't have no-first use policy, when we decided to use nukes than it will empty our stock piles in one strike -

Yeah you are going to fire 200 missiles in one go..Kid,We are watching you with our imaging and Radio Imaging satellites,and we can spot what mischeif you are upto.And when you begin the Nucler war war,the response would come immediately

 

[Goodbye!]

because we don't have no-first use policy, when we decided to use nukes than it will empty our stock piles in one strike -

How can you claim yourself to be so trigger-happy? When super powers of their time US and USSR could not find it in them to fire even a single shot, let alone a nuclear one during the cold war?

The only reason you dont need ABM is because you dont have the capability or because what you have is not worth protecting.

 

[Goodbye!]

! !

 

[skadoosh]

stock piles in one strike -

Sire, when you are arriving upon WC to potty, then also are you letting go all your stock piles in one strike?

 

[Cheetah786]

Why should Pakistan be concerned? Majority of its cities are just a stone throw away from the other side of the International Border. Prithvi is more than enough for that.

And what happens when the radiation starts to travel back to where the stone was thrown from?

 

[Windjammer]

Sire, when you are arriving upon WC to potty, then also are you letting go all your stock piles in one strike?

And then there are those who don't even have a potty to go on. !!

 

[Jade]

And what happens when the radiation starts to travel back to where the stone was thrown from?

Good question. That is why I am against nukes. Human life is more important than any man made boundaries.

 

[Sugarcane]

And India would retaliate with full force if we are ever attacked with Nukes,thats our policy.And probably the target would be Lahore/Karachi.And dont forget that Prahar has double the range of Nasr.



Yeah you are going to fire 200 missiles in one go..Kid,We are watching you with our imaging and Radio Imaging satellites,and we can spot what mischeif you are upto.And when you begin the Nucler war war,the response would come immediately

Keep watching - don't ever dare to cross red line