Pakistan Seeks To Counter Indian ABM Defenses

[The Deterrent]

PAKISTAN NEEDS 2 UPGRADE ITS MISSILES MAKE IT SUPERSONIC HYPERSONIC MAKE IT STEALTH RADAR EVADING WITH RADAR ABSORBING COATING ND WITH PIN POINT ACCURACY ALSO PAKISTAN SHOULD SHOWER SUPERSONIC ND HYPERSONIC MISSILES SIMULATENOUSLY IN THOUSANDS ON INDIAN AIR BASES BASES ARMY BASES ARMY HEADQAURTERS AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS NAVY HEADQUARTERS INDIAN PARLIAMENT INDIAN MISSILE CENTRES INDIAN ANTI MISSILE SYSTEMS INSTALLATIONS NUCLEAR CENTRES NUCLEAR COMMAND ND CONTROL CENTRES ETC ONTOP OF THT PAKISTAN NEEDS 2 MAKE AN ANTI BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENCE SYSTEM OF THEIR OWN FOR PAKISTANS DEFENCE AGAINST MISSILE ATTACKS ONTOP OF THT PAKISTAN NEEDS 2 MAKE A HYPERSONIC AIR LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE OF 2000 KM ND 3000 KM 2 TARGET INDIAN AIR BASES ND ARMY BASES ND MILLITARY INSTALLATIONS ETC ONTOP OF THT PAKISTAN NEEDS 2 MAKE A NAVAL VERSION OF HYPERSONIC BABUR CRUISE MISSILE THT CAN B LAUNCHED FROM FRIGATES DESTROYERS SUBMARINES ETC ONTOP OF THT PAKISTAN NEEDS HYPERSONIC SUBMARINE LAUNCHED BALLISTIC MISSILES THT CAN HIT EACH ND EVERY POINT ND EACH ND EVERY CORNER OF INDIA.

Mashwara tou bara acha hai aap ka, agar thoray paisay bhi arrange kar detay tou kiya hi baat thi...

 

[UNFINISHED-BUSINESS]

You both keep countering each other while countries like USA reap benefits out of you

 

[T90TankGuy]

Anyways as it seems, a war is must in next 10-15 years in South Asia.

Who exactly are you guys going to fight? yourself's? cuz the biggest enemy of Pakistan is in the form of the TTP .

 

[mjnaushad]

PAKISTAN NEEDS 2 UPGRADE ITS MISSILES MAKE IT SUPERSONIC HYPERSONIC MAKE IT STEALTH RADAR EVADING WITH RADAR ABSORBING COATING ND WITH PIN POINT ACCURACY ALSO PAKISTAN SHOULD SHOWER SUPERSONIC ND HYPERSONIC MISSILES SIMULATENOUSLY IN THOUSANDS ON INDIAN AIR BASES BASES ARMY BASES ARMY HEADQAURTERS AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS NAVY HEADQUARTERS INDIAN PARLIAMENT INDIAN MISSILE CENTRES INDIAN ANTI MISSILE SYSTEMS INSTALLATIONS NUCLEAR CENTRES NUCLEAR COMMAND ND CONTROL CENTRES ETC ONTOP OF THT PAKISTAN NEEDS 2 MAKE AN ANTI BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENCE SYSTEM OF THEIR OWN FOR PAKISTANS DEFENCE AGAINST MISSILE ATTACKS ONTOP OF THT PAKISTAN NEEDS 2 MAKE A HYPERSONIC AIR LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE OF 2000 KM ND 3000 KM 2 TARGET INDIAN AIR BASES ND ARMY BASES ND MILLITARY INSTALLATIONS ETC ONTOP OF THT PAKISTAN NEEDS 2 MAKE A NAVAL VERSION OF HYPERSONIC BABUR CRUISE MISSILE THT CAN B LAUNCHED FROM FRIGATES DESTROYERS SUBMARINES ETC ONTOP OF THT PAKISTAN NEEDS HYPERSONIC SUBMARINE LAUNCHED BALLISTIC MISSILES THT CAN HIT EACH ND EVERY POINT ND EACH ND EVERY CORNER OF INDIA.

Yours caps lock is on.

 

[Viking 63]

What options are avaliable to Pakistan in this Technology !!! anyone ....

 

[The Deterrent]

What options are avaliable to Pakistan in this Technology !!! anyone ....

There are a couple of options, to be implemented on the missiles themselves:

1. The most basic and relatively easier one is to introduce a counter-measure dispensing system in the ReV. It can be used to dispense basic radar counter-measures such as chaff and ReV-like inflated balloons in space. They will make it very difficult for the ABM search radar to distinguish between the actual warhead and dummies.

2. MRVs (multiple re-entry vehicles). Using the same concept of multiple incoming targets, multiple warheads can be deployed by a single missile. But it is relatively difficult as complex separation systems are required. The overall effect is that ABMs, except the midcourse interception ones, now have to face multiple targets per missile.

3. MIRVs (multiple independently-targeted re-entry vehicles). This approach is more complex then MRVs and is primarily aimed at delivering a massive first strike in shortest possible time using the least number of missiles. The warheads have to be jettisoned in space by a MIRV bus at pin-point positions so they are able to target different areas with precision. The ABM-countering role is secondary.

4. MaRVs (manoeuvrable re-entry vehicle). These systems are very difficult to design and implement as the warheads are moving at hypersonic speeds through the atmosphere during re-entry. Typically used against terminal ABMs, the ReV is designed such that it deviates from its ballistic trajectory constantly, thereby making it difficult for ABM radar to predict point of interception (because both the ReV and ABM are moving at very high velocities).

ABMs can be rendered ineffective by secondary means too i.e. destroying search and track radars and missiles inside enemy territory.

 

[acetophenol]

Sir g what land-based CIWS do you have ????

Not exactly CIWS,but we do have Russian "Shilka" system [a 23mm radar guided AA gun system,completely mobile,and upgraded at home,with capability of in house production] and the Russian "Tunguska" system[30mm radar guided AA gun and missile system].

 

[SajeevJino]

So you think a land based AK 630 CIWs will save you the hassle? seriously... i mean u have a little better luck with pantsir s-1 ... (which i think the russian army refused).. than an AK 630 installed on land.. haha

Lol

What is the last defense of Ships If all the defensive weapons are compromised

It's clear that AK 630 Will sure keeps The Air base from Low flying Cruise Missiles and Fighters

Pantysir ..Why Brazil keen to buy this System why Pantysir named as the lethal SAM system in Syria ..If Russia Ignored means there is lot of reasons behind them Just like why did the didn't induct the Brahmos Missile in their Ships ..?

 

[Umair Nawaz]

So you think a land based AK 630 CIWs will save you the hassle? seriously... i mean u have a little better luck with pantsir s-1 ... (which i think the russian army refused).. than an AK 630 installed on land.. haha

Dont worry they cant buy or produce before us. Their record is poor of buying and producing.
Remember Arjun tank and their ''indigenous'' A/c as well as Arty projects.

Pakistan on the other hand is way way ahead of them.

 

[sinocommander]

Dont worry they cant buy or produce before us. Their record is poor of buying and producing.
Remember Arjun tank and their ''indigenous'' A/c as well as Arty projects.

Pakistan on the other hand is way way ahead of them.

Even their submarine arihant and their shaurya and sagarika missile was built with russian help largely.Brahmos was also built with russian help. Even their agni-5 components and technology is believed to have russian expertise.

And india is backstabbing Russia. We chinese feared entering indo-pak wars because russia would get involved .Lately ,india is being part of west USA team and leaving russia. Plus russia is our ally now.

Next war will not be a indian victory for sure. China and pakistan will effectively counter it.Plus no russia will be there to stand up for india.Russia sticks with loyal allies,that is why it ditched libya(who played both sides) and has protected syria from NATO assault till now.

Lol

What is the last defense of Ships If all the defensive weapons are compromised

It's clear that AK 630 Will sure keeps The Air base from Low flying Cruise Missiles and Fighters

Pantysir ..Why Brazil keen to buy this System why Pantysir named as the lethal SAM system in Syria ..If Russia Ignored means there is lot of reasons behind them Just like why did the didn't induct the Brahmos Missile in their Ships ..?

Brahmos is a downgraded form of Yakhonts. Yakhonts has range of 500-600 km while Brahmos 290 km.

 

[sree45]

The more pakistan invests in Nukes and their delivery systems. The better it is for India. It reduces their conventional capability and puts a lot of strain on their economy(Maintenance of nuke warheads is expensive).

Since India is happy with the part of kshmir it has. Its upto pak to get J&K. India should do all it can to make PAK feel more insecure and thus putting a dent in Pak's conventional capability.

 

[sinocommander]

Lol

What is the last defense of Ships If all the defensive weapons are compromised

It's clear that AK 630 Will sure keeps The Air base from Low flying Cruise Missiles and Fighters

Pantysir ..Why Brazil keen to buy this System why Pantysir named as the lethal SAM system in Syria ..If Russia Ignored means there is lot of reasons behind them Just like why did the didn't induct the Brahmos Missile in their Ships ..?

Brahmos is a downgraded form of Yakhonts. Yakhonts has range of 500-600 km while Brahmos 290 km.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Your logic is contradictory here.

Even their submarine arihant and their shaurya and sagarika missile was built with russian help largely.Brahmos was also built with russian help. Even their agni-5 components and technology is believed to have russian expertise.

In the above section of the post you overtly admit the Russia assisted India's nuclear delivery systems. In other words Russia has technically countinues to iproves Indian nuclear capability that is targetted towards both China and Pakistan

And india is backstabbing Russia. We chinese feared entering indo-pak wars because russia would get involved .Lately ,india is being part of west USA team and leaving russia. Plus russia is our ally now.

Now despite Russia helping India to target China, you claim Russia is Chinese ally?

Next war will not be a indian victory for sure. China and pakistan will effectively counter it.Plus no russia will be there to stand up for india.Russia sticks with loyal allies,that is why it ditched libya(who played both sides) and has protected syria from NATO assault till now.

Russia was neutral in the Kargil war, where was China then?





Brahmos is a downgraded form of Yakhonts. Yakhonts has range of 500-600 km while Brahmos 290 km.[/QUOTE]

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Your logic is contradictory here.

Even their submarine arihant and their shaurya and sagarika missile was built with russian help largely.Brahmos was also built with russian help. Even their agni-5 components and technology is believed to have russian expertise.

In the above section of the post you overtly admit the Russia assisted India's nuclear delivery systems. In other words Russia has technically continues to improves Indian nuclear capability that is targeted towards both China and Pakistan

And india is backstabbing Russia. We chinese feared entering indo-pak wars because russia would get involved .Lately ,india is being part of west USA team and leaving russia. Plus russia is our ally now.

Now despite Russia helping India to target China with nukes, you claim Russia is Chinese ally?

Next war will not be a indian victory for sure. China and pakistan will effectively counter it.Plus no russia will be there to stand up for india.Russia sticks with loyal allies,that is why it ditched libya(who played both sides) and has protected syria from NATO assault till now.

Russia was neutral in the Kargil war, where was China then?





Brahmos is a downgraded form of Yakhonts. Yakhonts has range of 500-600 km while Brahmos 290 km.[/QUOTE]

 

[sinocommander]

Your logic is contradictory here.



In the above section of the post you overtly admit the Russia assisted India's nuclear delivery systems. In other words Russia has technically continues to improves Indian nuclear capability that is targeted towards both China and Pakistan



Now despite Russia helping India to target China with nukes, you claim Russia is Chinese ally?



Russia was neutral in the Kargil war, where was China then?





Brahmos is a downgraded form of Yakhonts. Yakhonts has range of 500-600 km while Brahmos 290 km.

[/QUOTE]


All that russian mentoring was till 2011-12.This was the year ,when India start its shift.The changing stance on Syrian war in influence of west,defense procurments and signing of mutual defence treaty with Qatar (who is the one causing trouble in Syria alongside West,GCC and Israel).

Well,please continue moving in western direction.Russia might hand us over the IFF codes of your missiles and weapons then possibly.