alikazmi007
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2006
- Messages
- 365
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Do we know if the J-10c is supercruise capable with the WS-10B engine? I haven't seen it anywhere if it is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't think TWR is that much?Do we know if the J-10c is supercruise capable with the WS-10B engine? I haven't seen it anywhere if it is.
It probably isn’t designed to do so, but hopefully a modification will be added in future variants, when it is hopefully also equipped with more powerful engines. Redesigning for super cruise may not be considered worth it for Chinese planners.Do we know if the J-10c is supercruise capable with the WS-10B engine? I haven't seen it anywhere if it is.
This YouTube poster is quoting KLJ-7A AESA with around 1000 elements as the Radar for J-10C. If I am not mistaken this is the Radar for JF-17 Block-3. The AESA radar for J-10C has 1200+ TRM's.An informative video on the systems of the J-10. Does his analysis seem correct? WS-10 has a max thrust of 140 kn.
Would the Arinc 429 bus interface allow the integration of foreign weapons systems?
He has to be Conservative.This YouTube poster is quoting KLJ-7A AESA with around 1000 elements as the Radar for J-10C. If I am not mistaken this is the Radar for JF-17 Block-3. The AESA radar for J-10C has 1200+ TRM's.
So much for him being knowledgeable.
Don't think TWR is that much?
This YouTube poster is quoting KLJ-7A AESA with around 1000 elements as the Radar for J-10C. If I am not mistaken this is the Radar for JF-17 Block-3. The AESA radar for J-10C has 1200+ TRM's.
So much for him being knowledgeable.
Euro fighter taking off without after burner , in super cruise, takes a much longer run on tarmac.CATIC revealed that J-10C is capable of "sporadic supercruise" in one of the promotion posters. I think with clean configuration it could perform a pseudo-supercruise much like the Eurofighter and Gripen.
But that's no excuse to be wrong and incorrect. He quoted a completely wrong radar. He doesn't know that's the radar for the Thunder he is quoting?He has to be Conservative.
That doesn't really make him knowledgeable, does it?He’s knowledgeable but that doesn’t mean he can’t get some aspects wrong. Also he limited his analysis to what he could find
Ok.Yes, there is NO doubt! As such I really don't understand, why @messiach is still telling that strange story of an AL-31F ToT! There is aircraft in PAF service using that engine and it makes simply no sense ...
Photography warriors, arm your cameras. You'll need it tomorrow.
Was it ever confirmed that ws-10 has American F-101 core?Pardon, but ok, is neither a reply nor an explanation! ... so I'm well aware I can only ask or beg for an explanation but at least an "ok" alone wont help to solve that issue and as you surely noted besides some hard-core supporter, there are many other mot reasonable members here who have the same questions.
So please explain why you think there is a ToT for the AL-31F or FN when the J-10Cs are using the WS-10B?
Was this a wrong information or has there been recent changes to an original plan to use it or why do you still claim this?
Kind regrads,
Deino
Was it ever confirmed that ws-10 has American F-101 core?