What's new

Make In India - Fighter Jet musings - News, Developments, Updates - F16,F18, Gripen, Any other

https://bulgarianmilitary.com/2019/...-will-be-manufactured-in-the-us-not-in-india/

The F-16 Fighters Offered To Bulgaria Will Be Manufactured In The US, Not In India
On Jan 24, 2019
The-F-16-Fighters-Offered-to-Bulgaria-will-be-Manufactured-in-the-US-Not-in-India.jpg

Photo credit: Businessinsider.com
SOFIA, Bulgaria (BulgarianMilitary.com) – The U.S. aerospace company Lockheed Martin denied the claims circulating in some media recently that the F-16 Block 70 fighters for Bulgaria will be manufactured in India, learned BulgarianMilitary.com.

The conclusion that the production of the fighters for which Bulgaria will negotiate could take place in India, derived from the possibility for the U.S. company to relocate its F-16 plant there, if it is awarded a large-scale military order. In India, the U.S. defence company is competing with Boeing’s F/A-18, Saab’s Gripen, Dassault Aviation’s Rafale, the Eurofighter Typhoon and a Russian fighter, for the supply of 114 combat aircraft to India’s Air Force. The deal is estimated to be worth more than $15 billion.

Read more: Bulgaria Starts Negotiating with the U.S. on the F-16 Purchase After Parliamentary Approval

According to Reuters, citing the vice president of strategy and business development at Lockheed Martin, Vivek Lall, the U.S. company would make the Asian country the sole global production center for the F-16 that would meet the requirements for the Indian military and overseas markets.

Read more: French Defense Minister Set to Garner New Contract for Rafale Jets in India

However, in a press release related to the recent statements, the International Business Development Director for the F-16 Program at Lockheed Martin, James Robinson, specifies that the fighters offered to our country will be manufactured in the company’s facility in Greenville, South Carolina.

Lockheed Martin’s statement, cites Robinson saying that the production of the very latest version of NATO’s benchmark single-engine fighter F-16 Block 70 aircraft for Bulgaria, will be held at the company’s F-16 production line in Greenville, South Carolina, where and the aircraft for Bahrain and Slovakia will also be produced. “We have not planned, nor have we ever suggested having F-16s for Bulgaria manufactured in any other country, including India,” the statement reads and adds that Lockheed Martin is headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, the U.S., with 100,000 employees around the world.

The company is currently shifting its production line from Fort Worth, Texas to Greenville, South Carolina.

Read more: Lockheed Martin: We Will Support Our New Bulgarian Partners

In the middle of the next month, the interstate talks for eight F-16 Block 70 fighters begin, with Bulgaria’s ambition the purchase not to exceed BGN 1.8 billion (with VAT). One of the unclear moments, so far, is when the production of the aircraft will take place.

Initially, Bulgaria wanted to acquire the first fighters within two years after signing the contract, but the U.S. and Lockheed Martin could hardly meet that requirement. However, Parliament has adopted the “deviation” from the requirements and all deadlines are yet to be negotiated. Lockheed Martin says they have already found a way to speed up the delivery process.
 
. .
.
They will have the french RBE2 AESA next month....
F16 will never came in the IAF inventory. Never.
I will wait for MMRCA 2.0 outcome. Yes Rafale is a great fighter jet and France has a history of supporting India on desperate times but India cannot overlook lucrative offers from Boeing and Lockheed to develop domestic defenses industries.
 
.
I will wait for MMRCA 2.0 outcome. Yes Rafale is a great fighter jet and France has a history of supporting India on desperate times but India cannot overlook lucrative offers from Boeing and Lockheed to develop domestic defenses industries.

Although desirable, I dont see LM or Boeing contributing to building Aerospace infra in India much, unless the IP issues between India and US are addressed.
 
.
.
Only RAFALe and SH have any chance of getting selected. Provided RAFALe is not bought on G2G basis.
 
. .
Only RAFALe and SH have any chance of getting selected. Provided RAFALe is not bought on G2G basis.

If the government wanted to buy more Rafales they would not have started a new tender, just restarted the old one. The Indian Government has told the IAF that they cannot afford to but hundreds of Rafale.
 
.
If the government wanted to buy more Rafales they would not have started a new tender, just restarted the old one. The Indian Government has told the IAF that they cannot afford to but hundreds of Rafale.

CapEx of IAF is so low that any new foreign acquisition of 100 planes will bankrupt it for a decade. This whole MRCA-2 saga is waste of time. Best case scenario for IAF is 36-54 RAFALE in G2G follow on deal and couple of squads of Flankers and Fulcrums. And probably some Tejas if that ever gets inducted.

Saying it for the past 4 years. 200+ Rafale are coming. The infra built is not for small civilian stuff.

200+ Rafales will cost IAF more than 50 Billion USD. Where will IAF find that kind of money ?
 
.
The picture in the article happens to show the Gripen E radar, LOL.
The article claims:
”ES-05 is the most technically advanced airborne radar systems in the world.”

View attachment 576230
No it doesn't. It discussed three radar including APG-83.
The picture in the article happens to show the Gripen E radar, LOL.
The article claims:
”ES-05 is the most technically advanced airborne radar systems in the world.”

View attachment 576230
One of them Raven ES. It discussed PESA and AESA. That's what I read.
 
.
No it doesn't. It discussed three radar including APG-83.

...
It did Yesterday.
I guess someone got their butt kicked, and edited the article.
Can’t have an American claim a European radar is better...

Actually, it is still there...
4091805F-287D-4B70-955D-52496E59C451.png
 
Last edited:
.
It did Yesterday.
I guess someone got their butt kicked, and edited the article.
Can’t have an American claim a European radar is better...
It's not about europe or america. It's about the technology. American is willing accept where there is better technology. It's not like Indian who sent Mig-21 to fight F-16 or the Russian who glorify Su-57.

For your education, Raven ES-05 has the best wide field of regard (120 degree) and GaN used comparing any radar in the world. APG-83 has the best ECCM capability in the world. Captor E has the best missile engagement capability. All are same level except Raven can see more than the others.

Study Wide Field of Regard and massage your bum, it will relief your brain.

Ohh read it again after you wear your eye glass https://exoatmospheric.wordpress.com/2019/08/27/active-electronically-scanned-array-asea-radar/
 
.
I will wait for MMRCA 2.0 outcome. Yes Rafale is a great fighter jet and France has a history of supporting India on desperate times but India cannot overlook lucrative offers from Boeing and Lockheed to develop domestic defenses industries.
The US will only accept to transfert some of their tech with the nearest ally : Canada, UK, Australia and New Zealand. Not more.
Add the fact that you buy Russian S400 and it's over (you will not suffer from CATSAA retaliation because you are a big market, not as Turkey, but you will not have access to latest tech)
US may only propose cheap weapons thanks to large serial production, but don't expect any significant ToT. Or with old junks like F16 (oups, F21 !) but only to produce the frame. Never you will have access to the AESA radar tech or electronic suite.

”ES-05 is the most technically advanced airborne radar systems in the world.”
if you except US AESA radars, Japan AESA ones, etc....

For your education, Raven ES-05 has the best wide field of regard (120 degree) and GaN used comparing any radar in the world.
120° with mechanical antenna moving : YES
GaN ? Not yet. Probably in a second variant (as every AESA radar)
 
.
if you except US AESA radars, Japan AESA ones, etc....


120° with mechanical antenna moving : YES
GaN ? Not yet. Probably in a second variant (as every AESA radar)

Not my claim, the claim was in the article
As for GaN, I agree. The Raven is still GaAs.
SAAB has a GaN based radar flying in the GlobalEye using EriEye-ER.
They have far gone development of a fighter radar version, but it was too late to include in Gripen E. In order to complete the development they need a target aircraft which will determine physical dimensions and number of T/Rs.

692E99B5-AF7A-444A-A11E-11CBED1097E8.png
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom