TopGun786
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2019
- Messages
- 1,182
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
Maybe you can ask China for J20.Nope, no US fighter plane, please
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe you can ask China for J20.Nope, no US fighter plane, please
Yes, if India wants an American fighter, the F21 is the only viable candidate. It can be produced in India and customised per Indian requirements.
No, they could send the naval version for INS Vikrant much earliar.
Maybe you can ask China for J20.
But when, at least 2035, don't you think its a bit late to join the stealth club?We should stick on our AMCA project.
When?
All your list are based on the timeframe given by the company, are you expecting all of them to be on time?I'm fine with even ten years from now.
1. We should start getting HAL Tejas Mk1a From next year.
2. HAL Tejas Mk2 from 2027-28
3. HAL TEDBF and AMCA form 2031-32...
I have given realistic time-frame, not the fancy.
So basically you are going to have a couple numbers of tejas, maybe some more rafale (if contract signed) before 2030, in seven long years, less than 50 jets? This is definitely not enought to support your big dream.I'm fine with even ten years from now.
1. We should start getting HAL Tejas Mk1a From next year.
2. HAL Tejas Mk2 from 2027-28
3. HAL TEDBF and AMCA form 2031-32...
I have given realistic time-frame, not the fancy.
I'm fine with even ten years from now.
1. We should start getting HAL Tejas Mk1a From next year.
2. HAL Tejas Mk2 from 2027-28
3. HAL TEDBF and AMCA form 2031-32...
I have given realistic time-frame, not the fancy.
All your list are based on the timeframe given by the company, are you expecting all of them to be on time?
I would be skeptical, your HAL ceo said the AMCA is expected to fly by 2030 and here you say getting them by 2031-32?????
So basically you are going to have a couple numbers of tejas, maybe some more rafale (if contract signed) before 2030, in seven long years, less than 50 jets? This is definitely not enought to support your big dream.
All your list are based on the timeframe given by the company, are you expecting all of them to be on time?
I would be skeptical, your HAL ceo said the AMCA is expected to fly by 2030 and here you say getting them by 2031-32?????
So basically you are going to have a couple numbers of tejas, maybe some more rafale (if contract signed) before 2030, in seven long years, less than 50 jets? This is definitely not enought to support your big dream.
Nonesense.
There is no date AMCA MK II yet as engine has not been finalized.
Non stealth AMCA MK I itself is being planned in the next decade.
Add another 30 years to these timelines.
10 years is for AMCA MK 1 will be non stealth version.
Coincidencely the Pakistan member has shared this, even though it sounds not right when he said first flight in 7 years and induction in 10...AMCA form 2031-32 (HAL given 2026-27)
HAl is developing the Aircraft, not DRDO.Coincidencely the Pakistan member has shared this, even though it sounds not right when he said first flight in 7 years and induction in 10...
2025 is just 2 years away, we shall see, but still, most of the project you listed are either having their first flight by late 20s or induction by 2030 and to build a considerable amount by mid 30s, early 40s..HAl is developing the Aircraft, not DRDO.
We will be able to deliver the first prototype in 2025-26 and have the first flight in 2026-27, C.B. Ananthakrishnan, Chairman and Managing Director of HAL said at DefExpo.
Why choose F-21 ? Why not choose F-16 ? F-16 is the most cost efficient fighterActually the F-15EX is the most capable US candidate and is the likeliest to be offered by Boeing.
The F-21 is very unlikely to find favor with the IAF, just as the F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet isn't of any interest either.
One of the strange things I found out was that the US offer for F-16Vs was costlier than Dassault's offer for Rafales. Operational and maintenance costs of the Rafale were apparently cheaper than those of the F-16V as was publicly informed by the Colombian Defense Minister. So can't say that the F-21 offer will be the lowest priced either.
The closest the F-21 ever really came to being in the pole position was when the IAF closed MRCA and then started the Single Engine Fighter (SEF) competition. That was effectively a 2 horse race between the F-21 and the Gripen E/F. But once that SEF competition was once again enlarged to allow twin engine fighters to enter and the MRFA was started, then the Rafale is once again the hot favorite.
This time around I am sincerely hoping that the MRFA RFP does not elicit any response from Eurofighter. They are best avoided as far as the IAF is concerned (Germany's attitude is of special concern to India) with their multi-national mess.
F-35 is in the very early stages of even being considered. While it is a very capable fighter and a true 5th gen at that, the biggest issues will not be S-400 related exemption (which I believe the US and India can handle via a data sharing prevention agreement) but rather the issue of ToT and setting up an assembly line to manufacture the F-35 in India.
The IAF loves the Rafale, is very happy with it's capabilities as of the Rafale F3R standard and there is a proper funded roadmap to get to F4, which is what will be offered. Rafales also have demonstrated very good availability and uptime, which are extremely important factors. There have been reports of multiple issues with F-35 fleets in multiple countries simply due to the complexity of the F-35, it's avionics, data management systems, etc.
Commonality is a big factor in cost savings and reducing number of types. Rafale comes up on top in all respects, especially given we already have 36 and both the squadrons were made operational in record time.