What's new

Japanese warship arrives Vietnam

Troops from Japan, the United States, and Australia have arrived in Vietnam for defense exchanges with local forces.

The transport vessel Kunisaki of Japan's Maritime Self-Defense Force arrived at a port in the central Vietnamese city of Da Nang on Friday.

It carried about 190 personnel from the Self-Defense Forces, as well as 140 troops from the US and Australia.

The visit is part of the US-led annual humanitarian mission called Pacific Partnership, which aims to promote defense exchanges with Southeast Asian nations.

The troops from the 3 countries began 10 days of activities with their Vietnamese counterparts, including medical services and sports, to strengthen cooperation.

The exchanges come amid rising tension between Vietnam and China over a territorial dispute in the South China Sea.

1-1402045354_660x0.jpg


5-1402045394_660x0.jpg

14-1402045480_660x0.jpg

16-1402045500_660x0.jpg


Such a beauty, the JDS Kunisaki... ;)

DSC_37124.jpg


DSCF1012-32.JPG
 
LOL at "third most powerful military in the world" begging for help but help never comes because everybody knows Viets are backstabbers... even Putin called Viets backstabbers and said "China go ahead and beat them into a bloody pulp with my blessing." :rofl:

In the world today, no one "help" other. Only common interests.
Ex., Americans have said Senkaku is in US-Japan defence treaty, so Senkaku is in a protecting umbrella of the US.
In contrast, Japan will not ignore if a US island that was attacked.
 
In the world today, no one "help" other. Only common interests.
Ex., Americans have said Senkaku is in US-Japan defence treaty, so Senkaku is in a protecting umbrella of the US.
In contrast, Japan will not ignore if a US island that was attacked.
DragonEmpire is a hardcore Chinazi. Bewared!
Do you know what 9910 stands for? It's not the ship number, is it?
 
Last edited:
haha, we already saw what they could do in the Diaoyu island, whinning and protesting all the time. So they rush to you mighty vietnam for help. we are awaiting for your powerful alliance at our oil rig. Don't disppointe us.

You can bully smaller and weaker ASEAN countries,. But that would be a great mistake if you invade Japan's Senkaku Islands.
They will occupy your Nanking once again if you dare to invade their Senkaku.
 
Japan's toy is not only beautiful but very delicate and deadly...
It is certainly a nightmare for chinese.

IF you know anything of current naval power, you wouldn't make that statement.

First, all Japanese combat vessels uses old radars that have since been passed by Chinese radars on the 52D and C. As well, as several European powers and the US.

Second, most Japanese vessels are based more or less on the American Aegis, but then again so is the Chinese one.
So thank the Americans for that design.

Third, Japanese ships by design and constitution are defensive ships, meaning anti ship, anti air, anti missile, but no ground attack capabilities and even its AEGIS systems are stripped, as well as its fighters by the Americans to need American ships by it's side for it to work effectively or at all in an offensive capacity.

Fourth and most importantly, American strategy on the seas require all AMERICAN resources, most of which the Japanese doesn't have. In other words, Japan can't even fight properly without the US, even if all its systems are not stripped, which it is.

EX would be drones, satellite(Military version), missiles, nuclear subs, air power, and more.....

Having said that, the Japanese navy is quite strong, in an all out battle, we would still win, but with heavy loses. What we are doing now is to reduce loses, with each passing year, we are reducing loses on our side and increasing it on theirs.


Japan will not come to Vietnam's aid, they know they will take heavy casualties win or lose, and would Japan do it for Vietnam? If you follow Japan, you know despite all the sabre rattles, Abe cares about his economy first and foremost. To put it bluntly, he would defend China before he attack it. Japan needs economy not a victory.
 
IF you know anything of current naval power, you wouldn't make that statement.

First, all Japanese combat vessels uses old radars that have since been passed by Chinese radars on the 52D and C. As well, as several European powers and the US.

Second, most Japanese vessels are based more or less on the American Aegis, but then again so is the Chinese one.
So thank the Americans for that design.

Third, Japanese ships by design and constitution are defensive ships, meaning anti ship, anti air, anti missile, but no ground attack capabilities and even its AEGIS systems are stripped, as well as its fighters by the Americans to need American ships by it's side for it to work effectively or at all in an offensive capacity.

Fourth and most importantly, American strategy on the seas require all AMERICAN resources, most of which the Japanese doesn't have. In other words, Japan can't even fight properly without the US, even if all its systems are not stripped, which it is.

EX would be drones, satellite(Military version), missiles, nuclear subs, air power, and more.....

Having said that, the Japanese navy is quite strong, in an all out battle, we would still win, but with heavy loses. What we are doing now is to reduce loses, with each passing year, we are reducing loses on our side and increasing it on theirs.


Japan will not come to Vietnam's aid, they know they will take heavy casualties win or lose, and would Japan do it for Vietnam? If you follow Japan, you know despite all the sabre rattles, Abe cares about his economy first and foremost. To put it bluntly, he would defend China before he attack it. Japan needs economy not a victory.

Are you sure that your copying toy is better?
 
Are you sure that your copying toy is better?

That's all you have to say? You know what a troll is? Copy? You even understand the term in terms of technology? This is why Vietnam and Philippines internet guys are crazy. You guys look it our navy, sees a few stories, and look it the exterior and thinks hey it's a copy.

Then we should be able to build it too, what you don't realize is billions have been poured in to design every part, including the length and width of the hall ways and the beds.

Even India, and Russia cannot make the Ships we can today.

You want to know if ours is better? Let me put it this way, right now, without license, only UK, US and China has the AEGIS warships. Does that answer you question? Or are you going to troll some more.
 
That's all you have to say? You know what a troll is? Copy? You even understand the term in terms of technology? This is why Vietnam and Philippines internet guys are crazy. You guys look it our navy, sees a few stories, and look it the exterior and thinks hey it's a copy.

Then we should be able to build it too, what you don't realize is billions have been poured in to design every part, including the length and width of the hall ways and the beds.

Even India, and Russia cannot make the Ships we can today.

You want to know if ours is better? Let me put it this way, right now, without license, only UK, US and China has the AEGIS warships. Does that answer you question? Or are you going to troll some more.

You're convincing me that china does not copy toys?
the fact that all chinese toys are copying toys.
 
That's all you have to say? You know what a troll is? Copy? You even understand the term in terms of technology? This is why Vietnam and Philippines internet guys are crazy. You guys look it our navy, sees a few stories, and look it the exterior and thinks hey it's a copy.

Then we should be able to build it too, what you don't realize is billions have been poured in to design every part, including the length and width of the hall ways and the beds.

Even India, and Russia cannot make the Ships we can today.

You want to know if ours is better? Let me put it this way, right now, without license, only UK, US and China has the AEGIS warships. Does that answer you question? Or are you going to troll some more.

Even the intercept missile you still wait for Russia made to copy, What is China made AEGIS without Russia designed missiles?
 
You're convincing me that china does not copy toys?
the fact that all chinese toys are copying toys.

how exactly do we copy? Does America let us take a look? If we were just copying why did we scrap plans to build a 10,000 ton ship some 25 or so years ago.

America is embargoing us and Russian ships are no where near their quality.


At best, we know more or less what the American ships can do and what ours should be able to do, that's about it.


We put billions into research, you can even see it from the type 52 series, new technology each step of the way, if we just copied, why do we need to do that, why not just one time and perfect.


Your inferiority complex has blinded you, if you ever decide to look at things objectively, you would see, there is no way to copy, there are thousands of systems on a ship, it's not a doll that you can just look at the outside and copy. These things are so complicated, even the length of the hallways are an important part.

Hence Vietnam can't even build a 1000 ton corvette, while we can build a 12,000 ton DDG and a 10,000 coast guard ship, cause we poured hundreds of billions into research and decades of research.

Even the intercept missile you still wait for Russia made to copy, What is China made AEGIS without Russia designed missiles?

That's interesting cause Russia doesn't have AEGIS. Nor is ours actually AEGIS. So Russians designed a missile for a system they don't have and used on a ship that also don't have the same system?

It's a missile not a windshield wiper, you can't just stick whatever you want on it. Too many things needs to be taken into account before it can be even considered.

Also even Americans don't go the copied route for our ships anymore. Since you like Uncle Sam so much perhaps you should follow suit.
 
What is your 12,000 ton DDG ?
Do you have any battlecruiser in the same level as Piotr Veliky 099 ?
Even American can't compete that ship ...

I think Russian never step on the track as American. They made the difference to counter-weight USA
Japan, Korea follow US track as they are parts of AEGIS system.

China simply follow the idea of US. Try your best to build good quality battle ships.
Name your really good battle ships not a soon-to-retire ones.

Taiwan even has better warships.

Actually, Vietnam is only afraid of China purchased Sovremeny-class

Let's see 20 years old nuclear-powered Pyotr Veliky 099 of Russia.
Wow to its armaments ... and radar systems
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom