al-Hasani
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2013
- Messages
- 14,060
- Reaction score
- 43
- Country
- Location
Phoenix. You are mostly talking about linguistics. What I said is correct in terms of genetic studies. Europeans themselves are very mixed. A average European has barely any ties to the average Pakistani, Indian or Iranian. Be it look, culture, religion, history, geography etc. The Aryans were very small in numbers. Most of the people just came under their influence. They were a small warrior class that culturally influenced others. It was not a mass-invasion by any kind. The Aryans were themselves Central Asian Nomads who were small in numbers. India is a prime example. 90% are locals following those peoples culture. Besides Northern India is a mixture of Turkic, Semitic, Iranian, Dravidian, Mongol etc. admixtures.
Just look at Central Asia today. Most are Turkic/Mongols. Look at Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan etc.
The Middle East is one of the most mixed and diverse areas/rich. It is the world's major crossroad. Europe, Africa and Asia all lies next to it. From where the first human migrations out of Africa took place.
You should better look at the admixture (overall) and haplogroups and their SUB-Haplogroups rather than linguistics. It's all that matters.
Did you read my link about the well-established fact about neolithic farmers that went to Europe? They all came from the Near East (Middle East).
Just look at Central Asia today. Most are Turkic/Mongols. Look at Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan etc.
The Middle East is one of the most mixed and diverse areas/rich. It is the world's major crossroad. Europe, Africa and Asia all lies next to it. From where the first human migrations out of Africa took place.
You should better look at the admixture (overall) and haplogroups and their SUB-Haplogroups rather than linguistics. It's all that matters.
Did you read my link about the well-established fact about neolithic farmers that went to Europe? They all came from the Near East (Middle East).