What's new

Ex Commanding-in-Chief of the Indian Central Air Command, SBP Sinha on Youtube

. .
i think he should also have an interview with christine fair for some classical chitrol.
 
.
You mean truth to come out post Modi?

Agreed. I wonder what horrors upon horrors of lies will surface once this BJP led rape of Indian conscience is finally over.

Regime change brings out many facts. In India before 2014 everyone was aware of the fake currency high denomination notes circulating in the market. Government of that time was perhaps was not only aware of the whole situation but in fact was a partner in crime.

After demonitization the amount of old currency notes deposited into the banks exceeded the total notes printed officially by Reserve Bank Of India. Banks were supposed to receive 80 percent of the currency back while they got back over 115 percent.

Some agencies had infected our economy with their nefarious designs. Nobody before 2014, uttered a word about fake currency while everyone knew about the source of it.

Therefore Regime change brings out many facts full of surprises.
 
. .
and you Indians believe him? Even his sons don't believe him tbh.
Who on this earth can believe a politician of all the people ?

His fate was sealed after Dawnleaks, His conviction started with Panama off shore companies revelations which had names of hundred of other fellow Pakistanis. He was the only one tried and found guilty for violation of some other rule and made to resign. This is my understanding, I might be wrong.
 
.
Who on this earth can believe a politician of all the people ?

His fate was sealed after Dawnleaks, His conviction started with Panama off shore companies revelations which had names of hundred of other fellow Pakistanis. He was the only one tried and found guilty for violation of some other rule and made to resign. This is my understanding, I might be wrong.
He didn't disclose his unpaid salary from his employment in UAE in his son's company (he even didn't disclose his employment) plus the panama flats were under his children's name so obviously he couldn't have been caught.. but he lied so many times that Supreme Court had to write what you can read in my signature.
 
.
.... His conviction started with Panama off shore companies revelations which had names of hundred of other fellow Pakistanis. He was the only one tried and found guilty for violation of some other rule and made to resign.

Let me make some clarifications.
1) In the Supreme Court case, you are referring to, he was not convicted, but disqualified, under Article 62 (1) f, of the Constitution of Pakistan, which is applicable only to the elected representatives and requires them to be "honest and ameen". It was not a trial, per se, but a special court proceeding, to establish his qualification, to remain a Member of National Assembly.
2) He didn't resign; but ceased to be the Member of the National Assembly, and consequently, the Prime Minister, owing to his disqualification, as mentioned above.
 
. .
Thats a clear exxageration

Brother what is an exaggeration!!

First you didn't post the whole sentence and also missed on perspective.
PAF entered Indian airspace and penetrated to 100 km,

I only said PAF entered Indian airspace, the second part of penetration, doesn't necessary means that the jets entered up to 100 km, they did penetrated over 100 km through their bombs. That is a fact.
You have to look at the whole quote in its perspective.
 
.
Brother what is an exaggeration!!

First you didn't post the whole sentence and also missed on perspective.


I only said PAF entered Indian airspace, the second part of penetration, doesn't necessary means that the jets entered up to 100 km, they did penetrated over 100 km through their bombs. That is a fact.
You have to look at the whole quote in its perspective.
Ok thankyou
 
. .
the deterrence value they had is long gone especialy after 26-Feb-20...
actually the events of 26 February solidify the deterrent value of Nuclear weapon, non-retaliation of India after 27th Feb events is more than enough to prove this, I would advise you to plz listen the IK speech in Parliament especially the part in which he referred the possibility of Brahmos attack and try to decipher the part in which he hinted about possible response.
 
Last edited:
.
So the IAF can see any PAF aircraft taking off and still it only had just four aircraft on CAP (2XSU-30-- 2X MK2)
The PAF hasn't learned to launch it's BVR missiles......but somehow managed to shoot down the MiG-21.
Abhinandan was shot down over India but drifted into Pakistan....I guess his bereaved MiG also decided to join him.
Do these characters even watch what they say or post.
I thought the Indians initially said that he crossed because his instruments were not working.
 
.
@Windjammer unable to find this whole program. do you have this?
Let me help you out...

No - no one has this or the one with the Defense Expert.

They removed the one you're talking about from their YouTube page & stopped airing the 2nd one during the interview.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom