What's new

Declarations & treaties signed for Kashmir, are still enforced. Russian FM Sergei Lavrov

So Lavrov just reiterated without any change the 50 year old Russian stance that all issues between Indian & Pakistan are meant to be resolved by bilateral talks based on bilateral deals like 1971 Simla agreement & 1999 Lahore declaration.
He made ZERO mention of UN resolutions.


How is this bad for India????
India always said bilateral agreements like 1971 Simla agreement are the only means to resolve disputes.

Russia did not also offer mediation.
Russia has not said anything different. the Russian ambassador has clearly said that Articel 370 is an internal matter of India and that Kashmir is a purely bilateral issue. Russia has repeatedly rejected UN mediation into Kashmir. Also remember it was Russia that blocked China's request to hold a formal meeting on Kashmir.

Also, Pakistanis have failed to explain why Russia is still bringing up Shimla, when Pakistan's position has been that India's actions violated Shimla. The fact is, Russia has supported India on Article 370 since day one. The fact Pakistanis are trying to spin Russia calling for bilateral talks(which almost every country has done) as support for Pakistan's position shows their desperation.
 
.
Russia has not said anything different. the Russian ambassador has clearly said that Articel 370 is an internal matter of India and that Kashmir is a purely bilateral issue. Russia has repeatedly rejected UN mediation into Kashmir. Also remember it was Russia that blocked China's request to hold a formal meeting on Kashmir.

Also, Pakistanis have failed to explain why Russia is still bringing up Shimla, when Pakistan's position has been that India's actions violated Shimla. The fact is, Russia has supported India on Article 370 since day one. The fact Pakistanis are trying to spin Russia calling for bilateral talks(which almost every country has done) as support for Pakistan's position shows their desperation.

What Russian FM said?
 
.
What Russian FM said?
1. Calling for bilateral Indo-Pak talks

2. Said that Shimla, Lahore, still apply.

keep in mind that India's position is that Shimla still applies, and Kashmir can only be discussed bilaterally between India and Pakistan in accordance with Shimla. If you disagree with me, show me an example when India said Shimla does not apply. It is only Pakistan that has said that.

nothing Lavrov said was against India's position. Also, he didn't mention Article 370, while the Russian ambassador to India specifically said Article 370 is an internal matter of India.

As for bilateral talks, India has clearly stated in a variety of international forums that it will talk to Pakistan when it stops supporting terrorism. Also, Imran Khan himself said there will be no talks with India.

Please explain to me how Lavrov said anything supporting Pakistan.
 
.
1. Calling for bilateral Indo-Pak talks

2. Said that Shimla, Lahore, still apply.

keep in mind that India's position is that Shimla still applies, and Kashmir can only be discussed bilaterally between India and Pakistan in accordance with Shimla. If you disagree with me, show me an example when India said Shimla does not apply. It is only Pakistan that has said that.

nothing Lavrov said was against India's position. Also, he didn't mention Article 370, while the Russian ambassador to India specifically said Article 370 is an internal matter of India.

As for bilateral talks, India has clearly stated in a variety of international forums that it will talk to Pakistan when it stops supporting terrorism. Also, Imran Khan himself said there will be no talks with India.

Please explain to me how Lavrov said anything supporting Pakistan.

Before asking me to explain to you and educate you; will you care to re-read what you type? and that Pakistan supporting terrorism thing has nothing to do with reality but more of a farce like Brahmin treating Dalit equally.
 
.
Russia has not said anything different. the Russian ambassador has clearly said that Articel 370 is an internal matter of India and that Kashmir is a purely bilateral issue. Russia has repeatedly rejected UN mediation into Kashmir. Also remember it was Russia that blocked China's request to hold a formal meeting on Kashmir.

Also, Pakistanis have failed to explain why Russia is still bringing up Shimla, when Pakistan's position has been that India's actions violated Shimla. The fact is, Russia has supported India on Article 370 since day one. The fact Pakistanis are trying to spin Russia calling for bilateral talks(which almost every country has done) as support for Pakistan's position shows their desperation.


Russian FM is the boss of the puny Ambassador to India. This chap has made controversial statements in past as well not inline with his bosses in Moscow. I wont put any credence to some local ambassador.
 
.
@Cobra Arbok lest not be a troll for q while and post again with what Russian FM said.... You are still running away from the argument and instead of making some logic, resorted to provoke others that we are suppose to spin? What do you expect that this is some kind of joke here that you can come and spam every thread.

The Nazism & Sanghism isn't letting you to understand that Russia did not say Kashmir is India's internal matter..... Article 370 is yours and you can do whatever you want to but KASHMIR is not India's internal matter.... that is what you aren't reading rather spinning continuously.
 
.
Russian FM is the boss of the puny Ambassador to India. This chap has made controversial statements in past as well not inline with his bosses in Moscow. I wont put any credence to some local ambassador.
So shy hasn't he been fired or forced to withdraw his statements? Like that bosnian ambassador who had to delete his tweet supporting Pakistan on Kashmir.
 
.
So shy hasn't he been fired or forced to withdraw his statements? Like that bosnian ambassador who had to delete his tweet supporting Pakistan on Kashmir.

What matter is FM and what is coming from Moscow. Pakistan deal with Moscow not with the Russian Ambassador in India. Take it as something for local consumption. What Russian FM said during UN session which is important, and that is the UN resolution on Kashmir, hence endorsing IOK as disputed territory, not part of India.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom