What's new

Besides Kashmir, What else are the reason of animosity between India and Pakistan?

They will come under the “ influence “ of Pak or China within minutes of being granted independence.
Isn't this exactly happened in 1947?

News from december 1992 :omghaha::omghaha:

meanwhile last week month in India. Shinning India :omghaha:
Taj Mahal is a mausoleum built on Shiva temple: BJP leader Vinay Katiyar
//economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/61133259.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
You dumb or what? I posted that Pakistanis destroyed temples in Pakistan in retaliation to Babri demolition. Contrary to your claim in previous post.
 
.
Isn't this exactly happened in 1947?
Exactly and India is still at a disadvantage due to that.

If we get the Chinese army sitting in “ independent” Kashmir....we might as well give up our country.

The Kashmiris can go write their complaints anywhere they like ..but we have to put our nations safety above their whining.
 
.
Isn't this exactly happened in 1947?


You dumb or what? I posted that Pakistanis destroyed temples in Pakistan in retaliation to Babri demolition. Contrary to your claim in previous post.
are you an imbecile or something and cant comprehend the logic behind my post that today india is a hindu terrorist country where BJP leaders are making moronic claims like taj mahal was made over a temple
 
. .
Since when does Pakistan want Delhi and Agra or Uttar Pradesh?
Delhi, Agra and Uttar Pradesh are legally Indian lands.

It is Kashmir which is disputed territory according to the UN.

Pakistan wants a Plebiscite to be held in Kashmir, since that is the only fair way to solve the problem.

Will Pakistani-Indian ties become better, I do not know, because there are cultural differences between the two nations.
 
.
unless majority of pakistanis are following islamic religion there can never be peace... pakistan will continuously try to hamper India which is multitude powerful in every parameter than pakistan it will weaken pakistan more and more and will ultimately pakistan will become somalia/syria if not already.
 
.
I always argue Kashmir is the sole reason of aggressive posture between two nuclear armed states. Once resolved there will be economic boom in the region. Kashmir is unfinished agenda of Partition.
 
Last edited:
.
Okay, I was downplaying or understating 'anger' with using the phrase 'not happy' for sarcasm. Kashmiri are pretty angry with us to be fair. And its not 'angry' as in 'you don't freaking do anything for us on time!' but 'You are freaken killing our youth! Leave us alone! You dogs!' angry.
If Muslims can claim entire Palestine land then why not Hindus claim entire Kashmir. We are the original people of Kashmir. Muslims are just invaders. We will not give it to Muslims just because they are Not Happy. We will do every thing to take it back even if takes many hundred years.
 
.
I always argue Kashmir is the sole reason aggressive posture between two nuclear warned states. Once resolved there will be economic boom in the region. Kashmir is unfinished agenda of Partition.

economic boom is already in India region we dont care about other regions.. anyway the so called other regions are failing and doomed to fail anyway,,,
 
.
If Muslims can claim entire Palestine land then why not Hindus claim entire Kashmir. We are the original people of Kashmir. Muslims are just invaders. We will not give it to Muslims just because they are Not Happy. We will do every thing to take it back even if takes many hundred years.
I think the issue is more of an India Pakistan issue, though it started out as a Hindu Muslim one. Heck even if India becomes Muslim Majority --miraculously, it simply cann't happen in reality-- Pakistan will still be fighting with India for Kashmir.
 
.
what the hell, Pakistan really doesn't want Delhi or Agra. T

aj mahal means nothing to us, your hindu extremists will do what they did to babri masjid to taj mahal as well eventually.
At the momentvwe content Delhi and Agra but who knows in futurebwe may change our mind
 
.
Not gonna happen,hey but if you say *for the sake of argument* Pakistan hands over pakistan_held kashmir then I am ready to argue


And do what
for the sake of argument *wet dreams * :crazy:
 
.
Its difficult to bring Pak and India close , even after kashmir issue is resolved.

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
 
. .
Would you then agree that Pakistan should also be accountable for civilian deaths in Baluch?

NWF did not want to join Pakistan at partition - frontier Gandhi preferred India.

Bacha khans last words to Congress was” you have thrown us to the wolves”

People Threw Stones At Bacha Khan When He Took Nehru To KPK.Just B'Coz Bacha Khan Preferred India Doesn't Mean That The Pashtun Population Felt The Same Way.Even Maulana Azad In His Book Admitted That Khudai Khidmatgar Had Lost All Popularity And That Pashtun People Wanted To Join Pakistan.The Referendum Was A Thumping 99% In Favour of Pakistan.

As For Balochistan BLA and BRA Terrorist Groups Should Account For Civillian Deaths More Than Pakistan
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom