What's new

Amritpal Singh demands Khalistan peacefully

If this is what Jinnah wanted, Pakistan should first give its own areas to Pakistani Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Parsis, Ahmadiyas etc - in accordance with the vision of Mr Jinnah. Many Sunnis also don't like the Shias, so once this division is done, the remaining Pakistan should be split between the Sunnis and Shias.

Pakistan is already a islamic Republic, we never said we would be equal or secular or any of that Bullshit, why would we do anything for anyone

You idiots were the ones who said India will be for all a secular state for all Indians regardless of faith,, and now you want a hindutva extremist state and Hindu Rashtra and are expecting hundreds of millions of Indian Muslims,Sikhs, Christians and other ethnic minorities to sit by whilst they are attacked, their history eroded and India fail to represent them in any way
 
.
Jinnah's vision wasn't just for Muslims

He understood that the peoples of South Asia were different, unique and had their own faith's, cultures

The hero's of one group were the villains of the other

And each group had the right to have space to celebrate who they were



This including Hindus to have their temples and whatever



What he understood was that SINGLE INDIA would be disaster because all these different groups could not function together and there would be catastrophic civil war


Today when you see India trying to erase Muslim history by renaming cities to Hindu ones or attacks on Mosques because hundreds of years ago, or attacks on the Golden Temple in 1984 it's EXACTLY what Jinnah said would happen


Indian Sikhs need an area of their own, they need separation, so do Indian Muslims and Christians and some ethnic groups




Partition is happening inside India,, people are moving, more and more areas will be Hindu only or Muslim only or Sikh only and the 'other' will be attacked

Partition is the ONLY solution




Hindus will talk batshit crazy about genocide and murder of Sikhs or Kashmiri and Indian Muslims proving the point Jinnah was making right from the beginning



Again with this,, Pakistan is a independent Muslim state

We had partition over 70 years ago,, we have nothing to do with India

Why would our land and country with near 100% Muslim majority population give up our cities or land because Indians hate each other
Which one is Jinnah's Pakistan? The Pakistan in 1947 or the Pakistan post 1971? Both are different 🤔
 
.
Afghanistan turned out superbly

Destroyed the Afghan nationalists
Kicked out India
USA, NATO gone
Not really. Not at this point. May turn out so in the longer run, but at this point Taliban and their support to TTP as well as other elements is turning out to be a grave security issue for Paksiatn.

An unstable nation next door isn’t a good thing to have.

What happens in the longer run, we will see as things unfold.

Jinnah's vision wasn't just for Muslims

He understood that the peoples of South Asia were different, unique and had their own faith's, cultures
Jinnah’s vision was destroyed the day West Paksiatn refused to give power to Awami League. That day proved that Jinnah’s vision of allowing all faiths, cultures etc etc, to prosper, died along with his death.
 
.
Which one is Jinnah's Pakistan? The Pakistan in 1947 or the Pakistan post 1971? Both are different 🤔

Both are the same, Independent Muslim states

Bangladesh is the same also a independent Muslim state

Indian Muslims, Sikhs, Christians and others need more because partition was incomplete in 1947

Not really. Not at this point. May turn out so in the longer run, but at this point Taliban and their support to TTP as well as other elements is turning out to be a grave security issue for Paksiatn.

An unstable nation next door isn’t a good thing to have.

What happens in the longer run, we will see as things unfold.


Jinnah’s vision was destroyed the day West Paksiatn refused to give power to Awami League. That day proved that Jinnah’s vision of allowing all faiths, cultures etc etc, to prosper, died along with his death.

No on both points

Just because the Taliban are a problem, doesn't mean that a Afghan Republic working with India wasn't a greater risk to our national interests

Whilst we may have fallout in the form of TTP terrorism and we have to deal with it, the wider risk of A Afghan nationalist Republic, India, USA, NATO all working against us was far far greater



Jinnah's vision is more alive today then EVER BEFORE

Bangladesh is Muslim state as per partition, Pakistan may have economic and political issues but those can be resolved and freedom and independence is priceless
 
.
Both are the same, Independent Muslim states

Bangladesh is the same also a independent Muslim state

Indian Muslims, Sikhs, Christians and others need more because partition was incomplete in 1947



No on both points

Just because the Taliban are a problem, doesn't mean that a Afghan Republic working with India wasn't a greater risk to our national interests

Whilst we may have fallout in the form of TTP terrorism and we have to deal with it, the wider risk of A Afghan nationalist Republic, India, USA, NATO all working against us was far far greater



Jinnah's vision is more alive today then EVER BEFORE

Bangladesh is Muslim state as per partition, Pakistan may have economic and political issues but those can be resolved and freedom and independence is priceless

I am asking about Pakistan, and not Bangladesh. Bangladesh is not Jinnah's Pakistan; it's Mujib's Bangladesh.

Which Pakistan is Jinnah's Pakistan? Formed in 1947, or the one formed after the split in 1971?
 
.
Whilst we may have fallout in the form of TTP terrorism and we have to deal with it, the wider risk of A Afghan nationalist Republic, India, USA, NATO all working against us was far far greater
I do wonder what is so great about paksiatn that entire world is scheming and plotting against it? As if the world has nothing else to do.
Bangladesh is Muslim state as per partition
Why couldn’t this Muslim identity hold the nation together? Was it not strong enough? If it was not, then does this mean that Muslims in current Pakistan with different ethnic identity have the right to a different nation? Now, I am not asking for it. It appears justified from your argument.

To me nations are more then colour, cast, creed religion etc etc. India has proven it without any doubt. It is stronger than what it was during independence. Multiple insurgencies we had at that time are waning and at the verge of ending. Economy is doing well. There are people in poverty but reducing everyday .

This Khalistan movement is like a child’s play compared to what we had during 80s in same Punjab. All those wishing ill for India will see their dreams shattered very soon.
 
. .
India really needs to stop the hinduization of it's republic, that republic day parade pics should open your eyes and eyes of India's minority relgions
View attachment 917822
No secular republic ever did that, that sends a clear message on what India is for better or worse

Khalistan is a stupid idea but bigger problem is how hinduization of your secular republic is alienating all the relgious minorities who'll act, may not do it rn but overtime if it continues will do so than you'll complain and add more relgions you hate in your list without self reflection
So, these are the oft talked about Indian republic day parade floats. Damn, even we never went so hardcore with religion. Our Pakistan Day parade has military tech and and cultural type floats only.
@-=virus=- , wth is going on, nigga? What's the opinion in india to this? Or is this a regular occurence and we just heard about it?
 
.
So, these are the oft talked about Indian republic day parade floats. Damn, even we never went so hardcore with religion. Our Pakistan Day parade has military tech and and cultural type floats only.
@-=virus=- , wth is going on, nigga? What's the opinion in india to this? Or is this a regular occurence and we just heard about it?
Yahan ka culture mythology etc ki floats banain ki Ghaznavi saab ki ? :D

it's ok, once a year thing.. left ko problem hogi, right guys seena taan ke will tell them to STFU because Jai Hind..

business as usual
 
.
I am asking about Pakistan, and not Bangladesh. Bangladesh is not Jinnah's Pakistan; it's Mujib's Bangladesh.

Which Pakistan is Jinnah's Pakistan? Formed in 1947, or the one formed after the split in 1971?

Yaar any independent state for Muslims in South Asia is a Jinnah's Pakistan

All Jinnah wanted was freedom for India's Muslims in free states, he told all peoples of South Asia YOU NEED SEPARATION because the hate Indians have for each other is too much to form one functional state and eventually majoritarianism will make life hell for hundreds of millions

Look at the hate inside india, the different communities all need more Pakistan's to defend them

I do wonder what is so great about paksiatn that entire world is scheming and plotting against it? As if the world has nothing else to do.

Why couldn’t this Muslim identity hold the nation together? Was it not strong enough? If it was not, then does this mean that Muslims in current Pakistan with different ethnic identity have the right to a different nation? Now, I am not asking for it. It appears justified from your argument.

To me nations are more then colour, cast, creed religion etc etc. India has proven it without any doubt. It is stronger than what it was during independence. Multiple insurgencies we had at that time are waning and at the verge of ending. Economy is doing well. There are people in poverty but reducing everyday .

This Khalistan movement is like a child’s play compared to what we had during 80s in same Punjab. All those wishing ill for India will see their dreams shattered very soon.

We were separated by 1000 miles, it was impossible remaining a single state, but Bangladesh is a Muslim independent state just as Jinnah envisioned

India is a communal disaster, beyond some economic growth, it's a hate filled cess pit that is pushing it's way to civil war at this rate
 
.
Our aim for Khalistan shouldn't be seen as evil & taboo. It should be seen from an intellectual point of view as to what could be its geopolitical benefits. It's an ideology &ideology never dies. We are not asking for it from Delhi: 'Waris Punjab De' chief Amritpal Singh


@Mirzah @Mirzali Khan @Sayfullah @villageidiot @_NOBODY_ @PakFactor @Raj-Hindustani @waz @kingQamaR @Meengla @Maula Jatt @PanzerKiel @Signalian
As early as 2020 post article 35a abrogation by India. The fauji boots of this forum started having orgasms over Khalistan.

I used to tell them even then with my old profile that they want Lahore and "charhda punjab" as well. Not just "lehnda punjab"

*Lehnda*: Lower/Descending
*Charhda*: Upper/Ascending
Accurate description as Punjab ascends in height above sea level quite sharply after Jhelum and salt ranges. Reaching Potohar Plateau then foothills of Murree region. Then jurisdiction changes over to KP.
 
.
As early as 2020 post article 35a abrogation by India. The fauji boots of this forum started having orgasms over Khalistan.

I used to tell them even then with my old profile that they want Lahore and "charhda punjab" as well. Not just "lehnda punjab"

*Lehnda*: Lower/Descending
*Charhda*: Upper/Ascending
Accurate description as Punjab ascends in height above sea level quite sharply after Jhelum and salt ranges. Reaching Potohar Plateau then foothills of Murree region. Then jurisdiction changes over to KP.
Why stress over what they want when it's impossible to have?
 
.
As early as 2020 post article 35a abrogation by India. The fauji boots of this forum started having orgasms over Khalistan.

I used to tell them even then with my old profile that they want Lahore and "charhda punjab" as well. Not just "lehnda punjab"

*Lehnda*: Lower/Descending
*Charhda*: Upper/Ascending
Accurate description as Punjab ascends in height above sea level quite sharply after Jhelum and salt ranges. Reaching Potohar Plateau then foothills of Murree region. Then jurisdiction changes over to KP.
Dude srsly who gives a shit lol?
Wanting doesn't mean you can even dream of getting, you do what's good for your intrests- that's that
 
.
India really needs to stop the hinduization of it's republic, that republic day parade pics should open your eyes and eyes of India's minority relgions
View attachment 917822
No secular republic ever did that, that sends a clear message on what India is for better or worse

Khalistan is a stupid idea but bigger problem is how hinduization of your secular republic is alienating all the relgious minorities who'll act, may not do it rn but overtime if it continues will do so than you'll complain and add more relgions you hate in your list without self reflection
It is good india is doing that and Hindutva Fever took hold.

When gods want to destroy someone first they take their sanity.
 
.
Which one is Jinnah's Pakistan? The Pakistan in 1947 or the Pakistan post 1971? Both are different 🤔

The Pakistan in 1947, Jinnah's Pakistan died in 1971.

What Sikh sites are there in Haryana?

Wasn't Haryana and Himachal part of East Punjab?

As early as 2020 post article 35a abrogation by India. The fauji boots of this forum started having orgasms over Khalistan.

I used to tell them even then with my old profile that they want Lahore and "charhda punjab" as well. Not just "lehnda punjab"

*Lehnda*: Lower/Descending
*Charhda*: Upper/Ascending
Accurate description as Punjab ascends in height above sea level quite sharply after Jhelum and salt ranges. Reaching Potohar Plateau then foothills of Murree region. Then jurisdiction changes over to KP.

Faujeets also don't realize it was Benazir who ended Khalistan LMAO
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom