What's new

Amritpal Singh demands Khalistan peacefully

this is not india where people go to railway lines and farms . people have every right to shit here . you can travel from karachi to khunjrab you will not see this image here

bZLl7vOopy4JrRaPcpkKDMxNPW_bQk5ALNocVql8tv5lMhq8NZsqYJkEu3pa4LIM-CVePCkPh3JgRXlmWMq2Nl-POG9cT-Gopfngel3SUrDCekdwlvPGv-dg1kqL-r-N
Such open defecation scenes are not there in Pakistan but were probably not there in Soviet Union and Yugoslavia also.

@That Guy @Maula Jatt @El Sidd @doorstar @Mentee @-blitzkrieg- @fitpOsitive
 
.
I don't understand why Indians supported Bangladeshi even though it was bangalis who were biggest supporters of partition- event so catastrophic that forever reduced Hindu population by % in the region, I don't understand why Indians support Afghans when Afghans routinely celebrate their atrocities against Hindus and adore their tormentors

I didn't need a history lesson of our region to figure out the why Randi Bhushan- I know it, we know it

Shouldn't have wasted your limited brain cells writing all that crap
This kind of nonsensical blabber is why you are still so backward. Grow up.
 
.
Paksiatn has a history of wrong strategic decisions. For e.g, Look at all the wars with India, that were started by Paksiatn. Did they gain anything?

More recent failure is Afghanistan. Their meddling in Afghanistan and propping up Taliban, has brought them to current mess, with both US and Afghanistan completely alienated.

Foresight and proper thinking hasn’t been a forte of Paksiatni Establishment. In hurry to take a side they have shot themselves in their foot almost every time.

If they do decide on any covert or overt support to those trying to drum-up Khalistan, then this history of mis-judgments might be helpful.
Rather than hurry to jump-in, looking at immediate gains w.r.t. India, it would be better to assess all the options and then make a move.
 
Last edited:
.
Because the Pakistani portion of Punjab is part of so-called Khalistan.... We must decide whether to begin with the Pakistani portion or the Indian portion.... Ned to schedule the meetings for the discussion :P

Khalishistan without the capital is not a good Idea.

View attachment 917894


Yaar we are a islamic Republic with a near 100% Muslim state, a independent state that partitioned from India because we had no tolerance to live alongside hindus or Sikhs or anyone

Why would we allow any non Muslim here???

Sikhs population is Indian Punjab and just as Jinnah told them in 1947 their only option is a Khalistan in east Punjab so they can have a state to defend themselves against a India that only pushes hindutva as state policy

Paksiatn has a history of wrong strategic decisions. For e.g, Look at all the wars with India, that were started by Paksiatn. Did they hold anything? Nothing.

More recent failure is Afghanistan. Their meddling in Afghanistan and propping up Taliban, has brought them to current mess, with both US and Afghanistan completely alienated.

Foresight and proper thinking hasn’t been a forte of Paksiatni Establishment. In hurry to take a side they have shot themselves in their foot almost every time.

If they do decide on any covert or overt support to those trying to drum-up Khalistan, then this history of mis-judgments might be helpful.
Rather than hurry to jump-in, looking at immediate gains w.r.t. India, it would be better to assess all the options and then make a move.

Afghanistan turned out superbly

Destroyed the Afghan nationalists
Kicked out India
USA, NATO gone

Fall out was to be expected
 
.
Yaar we are a islamic Republic with a near 100% Muslim state, a independent state that partitioned from India because we had no tolerance to live alongside hindus or Sikhs or anyone

Why would we allow any non Muslim here???

Sikhs population is Indian Punjab and just as Jinnah told them in 1947 their only option is a Khalistan in east Punjab so they can have a state to defend themselves against a India that only pushes hindutva as state policy

He doesn't care about Jinnah; does not care about Muslims or Hindus, he told that he wants to reclaim the lands they ruled. means, he was saying that Pakistan has occupied the part of Khalistan and will take back,
 
.
Our aim for Khalistan shouldn't be seen as evil & taboo. It should be seen from an intellectual point of view as to what could be its geopolitical benefits. It's an ideology &ideology never dies. We are not asking for it from Delhi: 'Waris Punjab De' chief Amritpal Singh


@Mirzah @Mirzali Khan @Sayfullah @villageidiot @_NOBODY_ @PakFactor @Raj-Hindustani @waz @kingQamaR @Meengla @Maula Jatt @PanzerKiel @Signalian
Indian State will give him a response - peacefully.
 
.
Pakistan MoFA should stand in solidarity with the oppressed Sikh, and flail India on deteriorating minority rights in Indian Punjab.
That'll teach them... 👍
 
.
A referendum with UN peacekeepers would be nice. hindus don't have the right to decide the fate of the Sikhs...

Hindus decided the fate of bangladeshi muslims without a referendum, have a spine first before talking about moral standing. :D
 
.
Sikhs population is Indian Punjab and just as Jinnah told them in 1947 their only option is a Khalistan in east Punjab so they can have a state to defend themselves against a India that only pushes hindutva as state policy
In 1947, the Sikhs were a minority even in East Punjab that included present day Haryana and Himachal. Even after the division of East Punjab and the creation of a Punjabi Subah, the Sikh majority is only around 55% or so. In any case, most Sikhs in India are busy going about their lives and have no time for these revisionist fantasies .

Most of the support for Khalistan seems to be concentrated in Pakistan, UK and Canada. So, maybe an East Khalistan can be established in Pakistan, a Mid Khalistan in the UK and a West Khalistan in Canada.

India will allow visa free travel from such a Khalistan to Amritsar.
 
.
Our aim for Khalistan shouldn't be seen as evil & taboo. It should be seen from an intellectual point of view as to what could be its geopolitical benefits. It's an ideology &ideology never dies. We are not asking for it from Delhi: 'Waris Punjab De' chief Amritpal Singh


@Mirzah @Mirzali Khan @Sayfullah @villageidiot @_NOBODY_ @PakFactor @Raj-Hindustani @waz @kingQamaR @Meengla @Maula Jatt @PanzerKiel @Signalian
Kashmiri freedom is linked to Khalistan freedom.
 
.
He doesn't care about Jinnah; does not care about Muslims or Hindus, he told that he wants to reclaim the lands they ruled. means, he was saying that Pakistan has occupied the part of Khalistan and will take back,

Yeah but what does it matter what a foreign dude says about sovereign Pakistan where we represent near enough the entire population

That's like some hindutva baakht declaring a aklund Bharat over all Pakistan or south asia

Hindus decided the fate of bangladeshi muslims without a referendum, have a spine first before talking about moral standing. :D

We had to run through millions of Hindus to ensure Bangla remained a free and independent Muslim state as per partition
 
.
Kashmiri freedom is linked to Khalistan freedom.
Good. So Pakistan should cede Lahore, Multan, Gujranwala and Peshawar to form a Azad Khalistan just like they have a Azad Kashmir.
 
.
In 1947, the Sikhs were a minority even in East Punjab that included present day Haryana and Himachal. Even after the division of East Punjab and the creation of a Punjabi Subah, the Sikh majority is only around 55% or so. In any case, most Sikhs in India are busy going about their lives and have no time for these revisionist fantasies .

Most of the support for Khalistan seems to be concentrated in Pakistan, UK and Canada. So, maybe an East Khalistan can be established in Pakistan, a Mid Khalistan in the UK and a West Khalistan in Canada.

India will allow visa free travel from such a Khalistan to Amritsar.

Jinnah's vision wasn't just for Muslims

He understood that the peoples of South Asia were different, unique and had their own faith's, cultures

The hero's of one group were the villains of the other

And each group had the right to have space to celebrate who they were



This including Hindus to have their temples and whatever



What he understood was that SINGLE INDIA would be disaster because all these different groups could not function together and there would be catastrophic civil war


Today when you see India trying to erase Muslim history by renaming cities to Hindu ones or attacks on Mosques because hundreds of years ago, or attacks on the Golden Temple in 1984 it's EXACTLY what Jinnah said would happen


Indian Sikhs need an area of their own, they need separation, so do Indian Muslims and Christians and some ethnic groups




Partition is happening inside India,, people are moving, more and more areas will be Hindu only or Muslim only or Sikh only and the 'other' will be attacked

Partition is the ONLY solution




Hindus will talk batshit crazy about genocide and murder of Sikhs or Kashmiri and Indian Muslims proving the point Jinnah was making right from the beginning

Good. So Pakistan should cede Lahore, Multan, Gujranwala and Peshawar to form a Azad Khalistan just like they have a Azad Kashmir.

Again with this,, Pakistan is a independent Muslim state

We had partition over 70 years ago,, we have nothing to do with India

Why would our land and country with near 100% Muslim majority population give up our cities or land because Indians hate each other
 
.
Indian Sikhs need an area of their own, they need separation, so do Indian Muslims and Christians and some ethnic groups
If this is what Jinnah wanted, Pakistan should first give its own areas to Pakistani Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Parsis, Ahmadiyas etc - in accordance with the vision of Mr Jinnah. Many Sunnis also don't like the Shias, so once this division is done, the remaining Pakistan should be split between the Sunnis and Shias.
 
.
Good. So Pakistan should cede Lahore, Multan, Gujranwala and Peshawar to form a Azad Khalistan just like they have a Azad Kashmir.
They can get Haryana and other places from the Indian side.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom