What's new

WHO WAS BEHIND LAHORE 3/3 Terror Attacks

It is clear there was no one following terrorists due to fear or pre-planned.They went on motorcycles.Now let me explain this point.No terrrorist would like to use bikes as they can be easily shooted from behind if any police was following them.So was it that they knew no body would be following them.Otherwise why did they used bikes.It was clearly a plan of ISI done to divert attention from Mumbai attack and to defame RAW.

Defame RAW??

The infamous RAW who have people like Col. Prohit!

May be because RAW killed high ranking officials under the garb of 26/11 therefore you think ISI might have been behind this.

No it has all markings of India's involvement, after Balouchistan this is India's new adventure in Pakistan.
 
.
6a6955b168b5897d7dbcdb1b4eec6483.gif


These guys look Pakistani unlike Kasab.
 
. .
I don't think that looks can really matter because people can be bought and trained kidnapped and trained or taken away so the way a person looks hardly matters.


You're right. Also there are many poor families in Pakistan who would do anything for money.
 
.
Pakistan’s jihadists no fans of cricket

Praveen Swami
Lashkar-e-Taiba has long loathed the region’s most popular sport
Many seminaries prohibit their students from playing the game

The British gave Muslims the bat and snatched the sword, says LeT magazine

NEW DELHI: Days before the terror attack in Lahore, the powerful pro-Taliban cleric Sufi Mohammad lashed out at cricket, describing it as a distraction that needed to be curbed.

Tuesday’s attack likely had little to do with cricket or Sri Lanka. Its purpose was to demonstrate to the Pakistani state and civil society the costs of confronting the increasingly-powerful jihadist groups.

But the attack focusses attention on one of the more peculiar preoccupations of the jihadist movement in Pakistan: a loathing of cricket, which elements of the religious right claim is part of a plot to destroy Islam.

In the wake of the 2004 India-Pakistan cricket series, which generated enormous popular goodwill in both countries, the Lashkar-e-Taiba magazine, Zarb-e-Taiba, set about explaining that the sport was objectionable. “The British,” Zarb-e-Taiba argued in its April 2004 edition, “gave Muslims the bat, snatched the sword and said to them: ‘You take this bat and play cricket. Give us your sword. With its help we will kill you and rape your women’

“It is sad,” the magazine caustically noted, “that Pakistanis are committing suicide after losing cricket matches to India. But they are not sacrificing their lives to protect the honour of the raped Kashmiri women. To watch a cricket match, we would take a day off from work. But for jihad, we have no time!”

By contrast, Zarb-e-Taiba pointed to the case of the Islamists’ arch-foe Israel. “Israel,” it observed, “is a very tiny country. [But] it does not play cricket. Therefore, it is progressing. We should throw the bat and seize the sword and instead of hitting six or four, cut the throats of the Hindus and the Jews.”

Zarb-e-Taiba sternly added that “the sports of a mujahid are archery, horse-riding and swimming. Apart from these sports, every hobby is un-Islamic. The above are not just sports but exercises for jihad. Cricket is an evil and sinful sport. Under the intoxication of cricket, Pakistanis have forgotten that these Hindu players come from the same nation that had raped our mothers, sisters, daughters, wives and daughters-in-law.”

Islamists have often found occasion to rail against cricket in the years since that article appeared. Last year, the weekly al-Qalam attacked Pakistan’s plans to reform the madrasa programme which, among other things, envisaged the initiation of an inter-seminary cricket tournament. It described the proposed tournament as “evil.” “We, the ulema of the Deoband school will have nothing to do with this tournament,” al-Qalam’s editors asserted in the April 17, 2008 issue.

“The West,” al-Qalam went on, “is promoting obscenity in Pakistan by promoting sports among girls’ educational institutions. It is a matter of shame for us that our daughters are playing cricket, hockey, football, and so on. The conspiracy is to change madrasas into regular schools and colleges. These conspiracies have been hatched by the enemies of Islam.”

Many seminaries claiming to adhere to the Deoband school of theology prohibit their students from playing cricket, as well as a welter of other sports. Others only forbid girl students from engaging in sporting pursuits.

Pro-cricket Islamists
Most Islamists, though, have embraced cricket and the nationalist fervour which goes with it. Jamaat-e-Islami politician Qazi Husain Ahmed, for example, is an ardent supporter of the game or so his party’s press releases suggest.

In the wake of a Pakistani victory in a one-day match in New Delhi, for example, the Jamaat-e-Islami leader said “the nation is standing in pride on this grand victory [sic].”

However, Ahmed warned that President Pervez Musharraf could use the popular euphoria generated by the victory to “slip from the principled national stance on Kashmir.” He expressed “fear that the General might give in on the Kashmir issue to save New Delhi from the humiliation of defeat in cricket.”

During its years in power, Afghanistan’s Taliban regime also embraced cricket although subject to rules which forbade the crowd from cheering and competitors from sporting short-sleeved shirts (women were barred from either playing or watching the game). In May 2001, an Afghan team toured Pakistan; the Taliban later unsuccessfully applied for membership of the International Cricket Council.

Indeed, Pakistan’s jihadists are known to have several ardent cricket fans in their ranks. Hafiz Mohammad Younus, a Dera Ghazi Khan resident who was killed while he was staging an attack on the Islamabad airport in 2007, was reported to have been an enthusiast.
 
.
Yes but they are still not allowed to hit Srilankan players with such weapons where does the Islam factor then go??
 
.
^ Dont post articles from "The Hindu" on this forum.

Moderators please delete Halaku Khan's post, the article comes from an unreliable source.
 
.
^ Dont post articles from "The Hindu" on this forum.

Moderators please delete Halaku Khan's post, the article comes from an unreliable source.

You should check for yourself the April 2004 issue of Zarb-e-Taiba.

The source I used is usually very reliable.
 
.
You should check for yourself the April 2004 issue of Zarb-e-Taiba.

The source I used is usually very reliable.

The source you used is an Indian news, "The Hindu", its known to be very anti-Pakistan. Articles from that newswebsite shouldn't be posted in a Pakistani forum. "The Hindu" always write their propaganda against Pakistan.
 
.
The source you used is an Indian news, "The Hindu", its known to be very anti-Pakistan. Articles from that newswebsite shouldn't be posted in a Pakistani forum. "The Hindu" always write their propaganda against Pakistan.

So you want to bury your head in the sand as regards the April 2004 issue of Zarb-e-Taiba?
 
.
So you want to bury your head in the sand as regards the April 2004 issue of Zarb-e-Taiba?

What the hell are you talking about?

What is Zarb-e-Taiba and what does that have anything to do with Lahore attacks?

Post your indian propaganda in an indian forum.
 
.
Lashkar-e-Taiba has a problem with India and only has a problem with India because of India's occupation of Kashmir. They dont have a problem with Sri Lanka so why on earth would they hurt Sri Lanka when Sri Lanka has nothing to do with either India or Kashmir?
 
.
What the hell are you talking about?

What is Zarb-e-Taiba and what does that have anything to do with Lahore attacks?

Post your indian propaganda in an indian forum.

The topic of this discussion is who could be behind this attack on the SL cricket team. You need to consider two factors: Capability and motivation.

There is no doubt as regards capability of the Jihadis. As for motivation, since the Jihadis are on a mission to purify society, their attitude towards the game is relevant.

IMHO the Jihadis must have had some inside support from someone who has very good knowledge of the procedures of the police. Recall that supposedly anonymous phone call that resulted in the route being changed at the last moment. Also the Jihadis were coolly wandering around in Liberty Circle for 15 minutes and walked away casually. That in itself raises questions whether some elements in the police were complicit.
 
.
The topic of this discussion is who could be behind this attack on the SL cricket team. You need to consider two factors: Capability and motivation.

There is no doubt as regards capability of the Jihadis. As for motivation, since the Jihadis are on a mission to purify society, their attitude towards the game is relevant.

IMHO the Jihadis must have had some inside support from someone who has very good knowledge of the procedures of the police. Recall that supposedly anonymous phone call that resulted in the route being changed at the last moment. Also the Jihadis were coolly wandering around in the Liberty Circle for 15 minutes and walked away casually. That in itself raises questions whether some elements in the police were complicit.

Six Pakistani policemen gave up their lives to protect Sri Lankan cricket players so dont talk nonsense here.
 
.
the Jihadis were coolly wandering around in the Liberty Circle for 15 minutes and walked away casually. That in itself raises questions whether some elements in the police were complicit.

That can easily be acheied because at the given moment the safety of our guests was of utmost importance to us.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom