What's new

US reaches out to Bajwa, offers ceasefire to Afghan

. . .
US is doing this because they are desperately trying to influence
the elections in Pakistan. They want to keep Imran Khan out.

They have also tasked Hussain Haqqani along with Reham for
charachter assasination. Pak army and ISI must keep the Americans
out and not do what Gen Kiyani done.

Kayani roll over and rigged 2 elections to bring in America's choice.
 
. . .
Later, he announced that American and Nato troops in Afghanistan will also observe a temporary ceasefire that Afghan President Ashraf Ghani has offered to the Taliban.

Its hilarious to imagine that Ghani has any such power or control over the theatre in Afghanistan to make a decision like this. These instructions came directly from Trump. Nice spin to avoid looking weak.
 
.
Not to be trusted. Instability in Afghanistan justifies continued American physical presence in the country (thereby allowing it to keep a direct military presence in the backywards of Russia, China and Iran). No way is the US giving that up especially as it saw in the case of Iraq, its physical withdrawel would result in anti-US elements attaining power with great ease.

Any US peace talk is as such hypocritical and not in their strategic interests.
 
.
jab thi tab konsa fauji un se pooch ker kam kerty thy ? only thing they need permission is firing a drone or fighting a war .
Bhai I don't much but those drone strikes have gone down a lot after PAF gave statement. Regarding this call. It was made to Pakistan because USA and Afghan govt was having hard time in Afghanistan and wanted a break from spring offensive. They used the same approach which India used the month of Ramzan is the reason for ceasefire. USA now knows it's position in Afghanistan and they have offered ceasefire and asked Pakistan for help to negotiate with taliban. One thing Ghani said is that they will target ISIS so this means that Afghans are getting back to their senses but this could also go in other direction nothing is clear at this point i will give it another 15 days to get the real picture of US intentions.
 
.
What's for Pakistan in it? I hope Bajwa Sahib will not bend and drop trousers like his predecessors.
 
.
Not to be trusted. Instability in Afghanistan justifies continued American physical presence in the country (thereby allowing it to keep a direct military presence in the backywards of Russia, China and Iran). No way is the US giving that up especially as it saw in the case of Iraq, its physical withdrawel would result in anti-US elements attaining power with great ease.

Any US peace talk is as such hypocritical and not in their strategic interests.

The cat was out the bag when Taliban and ISIS and TTP were based nearby their bases and they couldn't care less.

Entire Afghan border area with Pakistan is full of terrorists no shits given. Nearly entire Afghanistan is run by warlords no cares given. All they care about is their bases and testing out new drone hardware.

Iran and Pakistan should form a million man proxy army and pincer attack to push them back into Iraq.
 
.
jab thi tab konsa fauji un se pooch ker kam kerty thy ? only thing they need permission is firing a drone or fighting a war .
CIA Agent,propaganda karta hai.
What's for Pakistan in it? I hope Bajwa Sahib will not bend and drop trousers like his predecessors.
They are tricking Pakistan,if that would happen then can tomorrow easily say that Pakistan controls everything over there.
 
.
CIA Agent,propaganda karta hai.

They are tricking Pakistan,if that would happen then can tomorrow easily say that Pakistan controls everything over there.

But Bajwa can ask them to help building wall to address their concerns and return of Afghan refugees to ensure that no Afghan Taliban is hiding in Pakistan?
 
.
its not that simple..
we think pakistan has leverage but forget what if USA says we are leaving and simply put sanctions on pakistan

its not a bad idea to engage with talks, we need to fence, expel refugees, focus on econmy

it seems trump wants afghan problem solved before elections, this is his only card left...
i think he would first want to be veryaggresive and soften up taliban than he would like to reach some sort of agreement, with draw apart from some reisdual special forces, claim victory and with pakistan as fail safe back up plan(things go wrong blame paksitan)

afghan govt after all will not fall in first couple of months
Its not a bad idea only after US stops seeing Pakistan as part of the problem and not as part of the solution. Till than we are back to square 1. Just like this one:
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/penc...ulatory-call-to-pm-mulk.562421/#post-10547775
For once some one needs tell US to shut the hell up and shove those demands up where the sun does not shine. Pakistan has been saying for long that military solution is not the only solution and in the end it will be talks and negotiations that will bring a permanent peace. However both US and that pupped regime of Kabul does not wish to adhere to Pakistan's suggestion rather keep on blaming Pakistan.
US foreign policy on Pakistan is heavily influenced by India and this needs to stop, a condition Pakistan must put forward before we entertain anymore US officials.
 
.
But Bajwa can ask them to help building wall to address their concerns and return of Afghan refugees to ensure that no Afghan Taliban is hiding in Pakistan?
They are actully interested in none of them.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom