@
telkon @
ASQ-1918
guys im not from turkmenistan gov i hop u recall that
i tend to disagree, brother. i don't want to kill your joy, but turkmen army was described as "undertrained and underequiped even by central asian standards" by some western defence magazines and officials. and saying kyrgyzstan don't have real army is ranting LOL kyrgyz army was responsible for 150 km of tajiki border with afganistan in 1993-98, during tajik civil war. it saw action in 1998-99 against taliban/islamic movement of uzbekistan. kyrgyz army is in constant border skirmishes with tajiks and uzbeks. it participates in at least 7-8 international military exercises annually. 80% of kyrgyz army is based on professionals, not assbeat conscripts. military units are trained by/with us, russian, turkish, chinese tier 1 sf and commando units. granted, tanks-wise we are worse than uz, kaz, turkmen (thanks to soviet threat perception and kyrgyz terrain being not suitable for armoured warfare) and in general uz and kaz are better than us
first of all brother i didn't say that to make u upset or insult u im really shocked by your post if im make u upset i apologizes , saying that didn't bring me any joy nor pride
btw all of this dont make u a real army it's not enough to go to war with such few equipment
countries like uzbekistan azerbijan turkmenistan kazakhistan are countries with small army
countries like iran turkey pakistan are the countires with medium army
countries like usa china and russia are the countries with large army
and there is no shame or joy or pride to say that cuz it's a fact i hop u get my reasons
but we are definitely much more better than turkmens. turkmens couldn't even beat some ragtag taliban group of 50 militants not long ago and suffered casualties.
does they could occupied part of the country does they still hold their positions ? what those 50 terrorist could achieved ?? your reasons is really childish terrorist will wait in ambush site to ambush to kill and run they vanished among civilians of Afghanistan there is no base there is no standing army u cant attack the village and towns of afghanistan and kill it's people cuz some terrorist hiding among them does usa could fully destroy taliban in afghanistan ?? ofc some turkmen solider will die but how many terrorist were killed in that fight ??
btw today iran is suffering from terrorist in border with pakistan does it means they are weak ?? if so than how saddam with his iraqi army couldn't beat the iranians
i didn't said something emotional i said some thing reasonable
Wikimapia - Let's describe the whole world!
Wikimapia - Let's describe the whole world!
Wikimapia - Let's describe the whole world!
Wikimapia - Let's describe the whole world!
Wikimapia - Let's describe the whole world!
Wikimapia - Let's describe the whole world!
turkmenistan air force bunker
but there is serious issues with Turkmenistan's leadership. Something beyond even other post-Soviet dictatorships
it's no secret and i hop one day see it changed , but like as always say it's better than nothing look at kurds with such pop they dont have a country but we have it with these few pop we must try to make it better
Gurbanguly is sane compared to Saparmurat,
this is some thing give me hop to see turkmenistan with better future
Military investments are good for regional standards, but it seems that most of it are geared towards Caspian Sea.
it's wrong most money goes for air force and to the border of afghanistans btw turkmenistan navy still weakest in caspina sea and turkmenistan investments Compared to azerbijan russia kazakhistan and iran is still small