What's new

Turkiye's Role In Wars and Policies

sidkhan2

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 7, 2024
Messages
811
Reaction score
0
Country
Afghanistan
Location
Austria
It is time for an honest discussion about Turkey’s role in destabilizing the Middle East.
Erdogan’s foreign policy began as a bold, rebellious, neo-Ottoman vision—an ambitious attempt to restore Turkey’s influence over former Ottoman territories. However, this vision was eventually co-opted to serve Western interests in the region. What proved intolerable to the West, however, was Erdogan’s growing hostility toward Israel, exemplified by incidents like the Mavi Marmara crisis.
The turning point came in 2016. On a fateful night, Erdogan found himself on the brink of elimination during the coup attempt. Forced to plead with his people over FaceTime—appearing like a character pulled from a bad parody—he narrowly escaped an assassination attempt by commandos at his resort in Marmaris. That night, the old Erdogan died.
The message from the West was clear: opposition to Israel’s agenda was unacceptable. Erdogan capitulated almost immediately. Since then, his resistance has been reduced to little more than hollow rhetoric. His behavior over the past 13 months underscores this transformation. Despite fiery speeches, Turkey continued to supply oil to Israel without interruption, and Erdogan has worked to undermine Assad—one of Israel’s staunchest adversaries in the region.
Critics are right to point out that the United States and Israel benefit most from these developments. Yet, their success would have been far harder to achieve without Turkey’s willing participation. Turkey has become a hub for militant state-sponsored Islamism, with its influence stretching from Syria through Central Asia to China’s Xinjiang region.
It is Turkey that targets so-called “Turkish brother nations” with a toxic blend of radical Islamism, revisionist history, pan-Turkism, and victim hood propaganda. This strategy not only extends Turkey’s influence but also radicalizes individuals, turning them into tools for Western geopolitical objectives. The infamous Crocus terrorist attack in Moscow, for instance, was traced back to Turkish training camps.
Meanwhile, the jihadis left festering in Idlib have been unleashed once more, spreading chaos across Syria as they did a decade ago. This chaos is not incidental—it is cultivated, supported, and funded by the Turkish state. Under Erdogan, Turkey has become the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism, a willing accomplice in advancing the U.S. Empire’s objectives in the region.
The rest of Erdogan’s posturing is mere theater—smoke and mirrors designed to deceive only those still willing to believe in a dream that has long since died.
From Moscow to Beijing, it’s time to face this reality.

1733120743945.jpeg


https://x.com/Raziya_Khan0
 
.
During a recent speech by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Istanbul, protesters interrupted him with shouts accusing the Turkish government of facilitating military shipments to Israel. They specifically shouted, "Our ships are carrying bombs to Israel," highlighting growing discontent over Turkey's ongoing trade relations with Israel amidst the Gaza conflict.

Key Details:​

  • Protest Context: The interruption occurred at an international event organized by Turkish state broadcaster TRT. The protesters, part of the Direniş Çadırı (Resistance Tent) group, were voicing their opposition to Turkey's trade with Israel, particularly in light of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
  • Government Response: Following the protest, nine activists were arrested and charged with "insulting the president" and violating laws regarding public demonstrations. This reflects a broader crackdown on dissent regarding Turkey's foreign policy and trade practices.
  • Public Sentiment: The protest underscores significant public frustration with Erdoğan's administration for continuing trade ties with Israel, despite public condemnation of Israeli actions in Gaza. Critics argue that Turkey has been circumventing its own sanctions against Israel to maintain these economic relationships.

Broader Implications:​

The incident highlights the tensions within Turkey regarding its foreign policy, particularly as it relates to Israel and Palestine. As protests against government policies grow, they reflect a wider sentiment among various factions within Turkish society who are increasingly vocal about their opposition to perceived complicity in the conflict.

 
.
“If Israel, the US, the UK, Qatar and Turkey are on one side of a battle, why would you want to be on that side?
They haven’t given a DOLLAR, a BULLET, or an OUNCE of support to Gaza!
These ISIS and Al-Queda killers haven’t even broken an Israeli WINDOW!”

 
.
Pakistan should talk to Al-Turkiya and try to make them understand that the western alliance will not yield any low hanging fruit!

It is a stupid fantasy to believe the west will deliver any benefits.

We have our miserable 80 years in Pakistan as proof of concept to show for this disaster.

Any Pakistani taking sides in this inter-muslim conflict in Syria is a fukking idiot.

Pakistan needs to condemn all this sectarian nonsense and try to bring the warring parties together.
 
. .
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan delivered a provocative speech at the Seventh Religious Council in Ankara, declaring that Western civilization will ultimately collapse. Key points from his remarks include:

Core Message​

Erdoğan stated that the West's progress is built on "blood, tears, massacres, genocide, and exploitation" and predicted that Western civilization will "collapse with a great clamor" while Eastern civilization will rise and flourish.

Civilizational Critique​

He argued that Western civilization:
  • Is materially strong but morally weak
  • Excludes sacred and humane values
  • Represents a temporary era of progress

Broader Context​

Erdoğan's speech is part of a broader anti-Western civilizational populist narrative that:
  • Portrays Muslims as oppressed by the West
  • Positions Turkey as a potential leader of a Muslim civilizational bloc
  • Challenges Western technological and cultural dominance

Additional Observations​

The president also criticized Western digital culture, claiming that those who control digital technology are simultaneously "injecting their ideas, beliefs, and lifestyles into new generations."Erdoğan's rhetoric reflects a consistent pattern of civilizational populism that frames Turkey and Islamic civilization as morally superior to the West, while predicting its imminent decline.

1733480059713.png
 
.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan recently made statements suggesting aggressive actions by Turkish-backed forces in Syria, raising concerns about potential escalations in the region. Reports indicate that these proxies, including factions of the Syrian National Army and other militant groups supported by Ankara, are positioned to exert influence in strategic areas, including Damascus. This follows Turkey's broader strategy to counter Kurdish groups and expand its influence in northern Syria under the pretext of maintaining security and stability.

Erdoğan's rhetoric is viewed as an attempt to consolidate regional dominance while pressuring Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to reconcile on Turkey's terms. Observers note this could also be a maneuver to facilitate the return of Syrian refugees from Turkey, addressing growing domestic anti-refugee sentiment. However, the feasibility of such an offensive to "take over Damascus" remains questionable, given the complex dynamics involving Iranian, Russian, and U.S. interests in the region

This development highlights the ongoing volatility in Syria, where local and international actors continue to vie for control, shaping the post-conflict landscape.

1733487484853.png
 
.
Based on the search results provided, there is no direct quote from President Erdogan saying he hopes moderate rebels march to Homs and Damascus. However, the search results do provide relevant context about the situation in Syria:
  1. Turkish-backed rebel groups are advancing on two fronts in Syria:
    • The Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) jihadist group is moving southward towards Homs and Damascus.
    • The Syrian National Army (SNA) is advancing eastward towards Kurdish-held areas.
  2. Turkey's strategic interests in Syria include:
    • Dismantling the Kurdish autonomous region in northern Syria.
    • Pressuring Assad to agree to Turkish demands, including establishing a security zone and repatriating Syrian refugees.
  3. Erdogan is using rebel groups as leverage against Assad, similar to how Iran uses proxies in other conflicts.
  4. Turkey does not appear to want Assad's regime to collapse entirely, preferring he retain control over small enclaves around Damascus and the coast.
Regarding the quoted statement, while it's not directly attributed to Erdogan in the search results, it aligns with Turkey's reported attempts to negotiate with Assad. The search results mention that Assad has rejected Turkey's demands, including normalizing relations and allowing the return of refugees

 
.
Based on the search results provided, there is no direct quote from President Erdogan saying he hopes moderate rebels march to Homs and Damascus. However, the search results do provide relevant context about the situation in Syria:
  1. Turkish-backed rebel groups are advancing on two fronts in Syria:
    • The Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) jihadist group is moving southward towards Homs and Damascus.
    • The Syrian National Army (SNA) is advancing eastward towards Kurdish-held areas.
  2. Turkey's strategic interests in Syria include:
    • Dismantling the Kurdish autonomous region in northern Syria.
    • Pressuring Assad to agree to Turkish demands, including establishing a security zone and repatriating Syrian refugees.
  3. Erdogan is using rebel groups as leverage against Assad, similar to how Iran uses proxies in other conflicts.
  4. Turkey does not appear to want Assad's regime to collapse entirely, preferring he retain control over small enclaves around Damascus and the coast.
Regarding the quoted statement, while it's not directly attributed to Erdogan in the search results, it aligns with Turkey's reported attempts to negotiate with Assad. The search results mention that Assad has rejected Turkey's demands, including normalizing relations and allowing the return of refugees

Recent developments in the Syrian conflict indicate a significant shift in power dynamics, with opposition forces making substantial advances toward key cities, including Homs and potentially Damascus.

Key Developments:​

  1. Opposition Gains: Rebel forces, primarily led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), have successfully captured the cities of Aleppo and Hama, marking a critical turning point in the ongoing civil war. These victories have emboldened opposition groups and raised hopes for further advances towards the capital, Damascus.
  2. Strategic Importance of Homs: The city of Homs holds strategic significance as it connects various regions within Syria and is located just 162 kilometers north of Damascus. Control over Homs is crucial for any further military campaign aimed at the capital, as it serves as a vital junction for supply lines.
  3. Call to Action: HTS leader Abu Mohamed al-Joulani has expressed confidence in the opposition's ability to overthrow the Assad regime, stating that "the seeds of the regime's defeat have always been within it." This sentiment reflects a growing belief among rebel factions that they can capitalize on recent successes to challenge Assad's authority directly.
  4. Civilian Impact: As fighting intensifies, there are reports of significant civilian casualties and mass evacuations from affected areas. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights has noted an increase in displacement as residents flee from Homs and other conflict zones in anticipation of further clashes.
  5. International Dynamics: The shifting balance of power comes amid reduced support for Assad from key allies like Iran and Hezbollah, who are preoccupied with other regional conflicts. This change has provided an opportunity for opposition forces to regroup and launch their offensive.
  6. Future Outlook: The next steps for rebel forces are likely to involve consolidating their gains in Homs and preparing for a potential assault on Damascus. However, challenges remain, including the need to maintain unity among various factions and address logistical issues related to governance and civilian protection in newly captured areas.

Conclusion:​

The recent advances by Syrian opposition forces signify a critical juncture in the ongoing conflict, with the potential for significant changes in control over key urban centers. As these developments unfold, the focus will be on how both the Assad regime and opposition groups respond to this shifting landscape, particularly concerning the fate of Damascus.

 
.
Turkey-backed rebels have successfully captured the northern Syrian town of Manbij, which was previously held by U.S.-backed Kurdish forces known as the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). This development follows intense fighting that erupted after the recent overthrow of President Bashar al-Assad's regime.

Key Details:​

  1. Capture of Manbij:
    • The Syrian National Army (SNA), a coalition of Turkish-backed militias, launched an offensive against Manbij, asserting control over the town after fierce clashes with SDF fighters. Reports indicate that the SNA has made significant advances in the area, although the SDF has denied losing control of large parts of the city.
  2. Strategic Importance:
    • Manbij is strategically located west of the Euphrates River and approximately 30 kilometers (19 miles) south of the Turkish border. Its capture is seen as a critical shift in the dynamics of the Syrian conflict, especially given its previous role as a stronghold for U.S.-allied Kurdish forces since being liberated from ISIS in 2016.
  3. Local Reception:
    • Reports suggest that opposition forces were welcomed by some residents in Manbij, reflecting local sentiments towards the Kurdish administration and ongoing tensions in the region.
  4. Background Context:
    • The fighting in Manbij intensified following the recent declaration by rebel forces about the fall of Assad's regime after capturing Damascus. This has led to a power vacuum and increased military activity among various factions vying for control.
  5. International Reactions:
    • The capture of Manbij by Turkey-backed forces could exacerbate tensions between Turkey and its Western allies, particularly given that the U.S. has historically supported the SDF as a key ally in combating ISIS.
  6. Future Implications:
    • The situation remains fluid, with ongoing clashes expected as both sides continue to vie for control over key territories in northern Syria. The outcome will likely influence broader regional stability and security dynamics.

Conclusion:​

The capture of Manbij by Turkey-backed rebels marks a significant turning point in the Syrian conflict, highlighting shifting alliances and power dynamics following the collapse of Assad's regime. As various factions continue to engage in fierce battles for control, the implications for local governance and international relations remain critical areas to watch in the evolving landscape of Syria.

 
.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has made headlines by asserting that there are only two significant leaders left in the world: himself and Russian President Vladimir Putin. This statement reflects Erdogan's view of their long tenures in power and their roles in global politics.

Key Points from Erdogan's Statement:​

  1. Claim of Leadership:
    • Erdogan emphasized that both he and Putin have been in office for over two decades, making them among the most experienced political leaders globally. He stated, "There are only two [experienced] leaders in the world. They are myself and Vladimir Putin," highlighting their political longevity.
  2. Critique of Other Leaders:
    • The Turkish president criticized the current political landscape, particularly noting the decline of Germany's influence following the departure of former Chancellor Angela Merkel. He suggested that with her exit, significant political leadership in Germany has diminished.
  3. Importance of Dialogue:
    • Erdogan expressed a desire for continued dialogue between Turkey and Russia, indicating that their partnership is crucial for addressing global and regional issues. He believes that their collaboration sends a strong message to Western powers, particularly the United States.
  4. Historical Context:
    • Erdogan's remarks come amid ongoing geopolitical tensions and shifting alliances, particularly in the context of conflicts in Syria and Ukraine. His assertion positions Turkey as a key player alongside Russia in navigating these complex dynamics.
  5. Public Engagement:
    • The comments were made during a conversation with young people in Gaziantep province, where Erdogan often seeks to connect with the youth on national and international issues.

Conclusion:​

Erdogan's declaration of himself and Putin as the last significant leaders underscores his ambition to assert Turkey's role on the global stage while reinforcing his alliance with Russia. As both leaders navigate their respective challenges, their partnership could have far-reaching implications for international relations and regional stability.

1733748681849.png
 
.
Alexander Dugin, a prominent Russian philosopher and political theorist, has made headlines with his provocative statements regarding Turkey's role in the Syrian conflict and its relationship with Russia. Dugin, often referred to as "Putin's Rasputin," has articulated a critical view of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's strategic decisions, particularly in relation to Syria. He argues that Erdoğan has made significant miscalculations that have jeopardized Turkey's standing and alliances, particularly with Russia and Iran.

Dugin's Perspective on Erdoğan's Strategic Mistakes​

Dugin asserts that Syria was a trap for Erdoğan, suggesting that Turkey's involvement in the Syrian civil war has led to detrimental consequences for its foreign policy. He claims that Erdoğan's decision to engage in Syria was a strategic blunder that not only betrayed Russia but also Iran, both of which have been crucial allies for Turkey in the region. According to Dugin, this betrayal has set Turkey on a path toward inevitable decline, stating, "He was doomed. And now the end of Turkey has begun"

The Context of Turkish-Russian Relations​

Historically, relations between Turkey and Russia have been complex and often fraught with tension. The two nations have oscillated between cooperation and confrontation, particularly in the context of the Syrian conflict. Following Turkey's downing of a Russian warplane in 2015, relations soured significantly. However, Dugin played a role in facilitating a rapprochement between the two countries, emphasizing the need for collaboration against common threats
Dugin’s views reflect a broader Eurasianist ideology, which promotes the idea of a geopolitical alliance among Russia, Turkey, and Iran as a counterbalance to Western influence. He believes that Erdoğan’s actions have alienated these potential allies at a critical juncture in regional politics.

Implications of Dugin's Statements​

Dugin’s assertions carry weight not only because of his philosophical background but also due to his perceived influence within Russian political circles. His commentary suggests that Erdoğan's reliance on NATO and Western support is increasingly untenable as Russia seeks to expand its influence in the Middle East. Dugin argues that Turkey's alignment with Western powers, particularly the United States, undermines its relationships with non-Western allies like Russia and Iran.

The Shift in Turkish Foreign Policy​

Since the failed coup attempt in 2016, Turkey’s foreign policy has shifted significantly towards Eurasianism. This shift is characterized by an increasing alignment with Russia and Iran at the expense of traditional ties with Western nations
Under Erdoğan’s leadership, Turkey has engaged in military operations in Syria aimed at countering Kurdish forces linked to the PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party), which Ankara designates as terrorists. This military engagement has often aligned with Russian interests in the region, further complicating the dynamics of Turkish-American relations Dugin posits that Erdoğan’s failure to navigate these complex relationships effectively is indicative of a broader strategic failure that could lead to Turkey’s isolation on the international stage. He emphasizes that Erdoğan’s betrayals—of both Russia and Iran—have left Turkey vulnerable as it faces increasing pressure from multiple fronts.

The Future of Turkish-Russian Relations​

Looking forward, Dugin warns that unless Erdoğan recalibrates his foreign policy to prioritize cooperation with Russia and Iran over Western alliances, Turkey risks facing severe geopolitical consequences. He suggests that the current trajectory could lead to Turkey’s diminishing influence in regional politics and potentially its destabilization

Conclusion: A Critical Juncture for Turkey​

In summary, Alexander Dugin's critique of Erdoğan highlights significant tensions within Turkish foreign policy amid shifting alliances in the Middle East. His assertion that Turkey is on a path toward decline due to strategic errors underscores the precarious nature of international relations in this volatile region. As Turkey navigates its complex relationships with both Western powers and non-Western allies like Russia and Iran, it must carefully consider its future direction to avoid further entrapment in geopolitical conflicts. Dugin's insights serve as a stark reminder of the intricate web of alliances and enmities that define contemporary geopolitics, particularly as countries like Turkey grapple with their identities and roles on the global stage.

1733822627965.jpeg
 
.
Alexander Dugin, a prominent Russian philosopher and political theorist, has made headlines with his provocative statements regarding Turkey's role in the Syrian conflict and its relationship with Russia. Dugin, often referred to as "Putin's Rasputin," has articulated a critical view of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's strategic decisions, particularly in relation to Syria. He argues that Erdoğan has made significant miscalculations that have jeopardized Turkey's standing and alliances, particularly with Russia and Iran.

Dugin's Perspective on Erdoğan's Strategic Mistakes​

Dugin asserts that Syria was a trap for Erdoğan, suggesting that Turkey's involvement in the Syrian civil war has led to detrimental consequences for its foreign policy. He claims that Erdoğan's decision to engage in Syria was a strategic blunder that not only betrayed Russia but also Iran, both of which have been crucial allies for Turkey in the region. According to Dugin, this betrayal has set Turkey on a path toward inevitable decline, stating, "He was doomed. And now the end of Turkey has begun"

The Context of Turkish-Russian Relations​

Historically, relations between Turkey and Russia have been complex and often fraught with tension. The two nations have oscillated between cooperation and confrontation, particularly in the context of the Syrian conflict. Following Turkey's downing of a Russian warplane in 2015, relations soured significantly. However, Dugin played a role in facilitating a rapprochement between the two countries, emphasizing the need for collaboration against common threats
Dugin’s views reflect a broader Eurasianist ideology, which promotes the idea of a geopolitical alliance among Russia, Turkey, and Iran as a counterbalance to Western influence. He believes that Erdoğan’s actions have alienated these potential allies at a critical juncture in regional politics.

Implications of Dugin's Statements​

Dugin’s assertions carry weight not only because of his philosophical background but also due to his perceived influence within Russian political circles. His commentary suggests that Erdoğan's reliance on NATO and Western support is increasingly untenable as Russia seeks to expand its influence in the Middle East. Dugin argues that Turkey's alignment with Western powers, particularly the United States, undermines its relationships with non-Western allies like Russia and Iran.

The Shift in Turkish Foreign Policy​

Since the failed coup attempt in 2016, Turkey’s foreign policy has shifted significantly towards Eurasianism. This shift is characterized by an increasing alignment with Russia and Iran at the expense of traditional ties with Western nations
Under Erdoğan’s leadership, Turkey has engaged in military operations in Syria aimed at countering Kurdish forces linked to the PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party), which Ankara designates as terrorists. This military engagement has often aligned with Russian interests in the region, further complicating the dynamics of Turkish-American relations Dugin posits that Erdoğan’s failure to navigate these complex relationships effectively is indicative of a broader strategic failure that could lead to Turkey’s isolation on the international stage. He emphasizes that Erdoğan’s betrayals—of both Russia and Iran—have left Turkey vulnerable as it faces increasing pressure from multiple fronts.

The Future of Turkish-Russian Relations​

Looking forward, Dugin warns that unless Erdoğan recalibrates his foreign policy to prioritize cooperation with Russia and Iran over Western alliances, Turkey risks facing severe geopolitical consequences. He suggests that the current trajectory could lead to Turkey’s diminishing influence in regional politics and potentially its destabilization

Conclusion: A Critical Juncture for Turkey​

In summary, Alexander Dugin's critique of Erdoğan highlights significant tensions within Turkish foreign policy amid shifting alliances in the Middle East. His assertion that Turkey is on a path toward decline due to strategic errors underscores the precarious nature of international relations in this volatile region. As Turkey navigates its complex relationships with both Western powers and non-Western allies like Russia and Iran, it must carefully consider its future direction to avoid further entrapment in geopolitical conflicts. Dugin's insights serve as a stark reminder of the intricate web of alliances and enmities that define contemporary geopolitics, particularly as countries like Turkey grapple with their identities and roles on the global stage.

View attachment 1035279

Alexander Dugin, a prominent Russian philosopher and political theorist, is known for his support of Russian nationalism, Eurasianism, and his advocacy for a strong geopolitical alliance between Russia, Iran, and Syria. His views often align with a vision of a multipolar world order, in which Russia plays a central role.

When Dugin states that "Syria was a trap for Erdogan," he is likely referring to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's involvement in the Syrian conflict, which has been a delicate and complex issue for Turkey. Erdogan initially supported opposition forces fighting against the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad, which put Turkey in opposition to both Russia and Iran, who supported Assad.

For Dugin, this involvement might be seen as a strategic mistake because it aligned Turkey against Russia and Iran, two key partners in the region. Dugin might argue that Erdogan miscalculated the consequences of his actions, not fully understanding the strength of the Russian-Iranian alliance in Syria, and underestimating the power and influence Russia has in shaping the outcomes of the Syrian civil war.

The phrase "He has betrayed Russia. He had betrayed Iran" reflects Dugin's belief that by supporting groups opposed to Assad, Erdogan has damaged or weakened the geopolitical alignment between Turkey, Russia, and Iran. Dugin might see this as a betrayal of the broader Eurasianist vision, which calls for cooperation and mutual support among these nations in the face of Western influence.

Finally, the statement "He is doomed" reflects Dugin's belief in the long-term consequences of these strategic miscalculations. According to Dugin's worldview, Erdogan's policies may eventually lead to Turkey's isolation or downfall in the region if he continues to oppose Russian and Iranian interests.

In summary, Dugin's analysis paints Erdogan's actions in Syria as a major strategic blunder that has distanced Turkey from Russia and Iran, potentially leaving Erdogan's political future in jeopardy if these alliances break down further.

1733833865182.jpeg
 
.
Alexander Dugin, a prominent Russian philosopher and political theorist, is known for his support of Russian nationalism, Eurasianism, and his advocacy for a strong geopolitical alliance between Russia, Iran, and Syria. His views often align with a vision of a multipolar world order, in which Russia plays a central role.

When Dugin states that "Syria was a trap for Erdogan," he is likely referring to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's involvement in the Syrian conflict, which has been a delicate and complex issue for Turkey. Erdogan initially supported opposition forces fighting against the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad, which put Turkey in opposition to both Russia and Iran, who supported Assad.

For Dugin, this involvement might be seen as a strategic mistake because it aligned Turkey against Russia and Iran, two key partners in the region. Dugin might argue that Erdogan miscalculated the consequences of his actions, not fully understanding the strength of the Russian-Iranian alliance in Syria, and underestimating the power and influence Russia has in shaping the outcomes of the Syrian civil war.

The phrase "He has betrayed Russia. He had betrayed Iran" reflects Dugin's belief that by supporting groups opposed to Assad, Erdogan has damaged or weakened the geopolitical alignment between Turkey, Russia, and Iran. Dugin might see this as a betrayal of the broader Eurasianist vision, which calls for cooperation and mutual support among these nations in the face of Western influence.

Finally, the statement "He is doomed" reflects Dugin's belief in the long-term consequences of these strategic miscalculations. According to Dugin's worldview, Erdogan's policies may eventually lead to Turkey's isolation or downfall in the region if he continues to oppose Russian and Iranian interests.

In summary, Dugin's analysis paints Erdogan's actions in Syria as a major strategic blunder that has distanced Turkey from Russia and Iran, potentially leaving Erdogan's political future in jeopardy if these alliances break down further.

View attachment 1035304
Turkish television have brought attention to a proposed future expansion map for Turkey by 2025, which reportedly includes territories in Armenia, Georgia, Greece, Bulgaria, Cyprus, and northern parts of Iraq and Syria. This ambitious plan has raised eyebrows and concerns among neighboring countries and international observers.

Key Points of the Proposed Expansion​

  • Territorial Claims: The proposed map suggests that Turkey aims to assert control or influence over significant areas in neighboring countries. This includes regions historically associated with ethnic Turks or areas of strategic importance.
  • Geopolitical Context: The discussion around this expansion comes amid heightened tensions in the region, particularly following Turkey's military operations in northern Syria and Iraq against Kurdish forces. Turkey has justified these operations as necessary for national security, aiming to create a buffer zone against perceived threats from militant groups.
  • Historical Claims: Turkey's interest in expanding its territory can be traced back to historical claims and the Ottoman Empire's former reach across these regions. However, such aspirations are contentious and could lead to further regional instability.

Reactions from Neighboring Countries​

  • Concerns from Armenia and Greece: Both Armenia and Greece have expressed alarm over Turkey's territorial ambitions, fearing that such moves could lead to increased aggression and conflict in the region. Historical grievances and territorial disputes remain sensitive issues between these nations.
  • International Implications: The proposed expansion could strain Turkey's relations with NATO allies and other Western nations, particularly if perceived as aggressive expansionism. The potential for conflict may prompt diplomatic responses aimed at maintaining regional stability.

Conclusion​

The discussions surrounding Turkey's proposed territorial expansion by 2025 reflect broader geopolitical dynamics in the region. As Turkey navigates its ambitions amidst ongoing conflicts and historical tensions, the implications for regional security and international relations will be significant. Neighboring countries will likely remain vigilant as these discussions unfold, anticipating potential changes in the balance of power in the region.


1733836862919.jpeg
 
.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has emphasized the significance of the next two to three months for both Turkey and the world, particularly in light of recent developments in Syria. He stated that these upcoming months will be crucial in shaping the future political landscape of the region.

Key Points from Erdogan's Statements​

  1. Syria's Territorial Integrity: Erdogan reiterated Turkey's commitment to preserving Syria's territorial integrity, especially following the collapse of Bashar al-Assad's regime. He highlighted that Turkey views the situation in Syria through a moral lens and aims to protect its borders from terrorist threats posed by groups like the PKK and ISIS.
  2. Recent Developments: The Turkish president noted that recent military actions have led to the liberation of key Syrian cities from terrorist occupation, which he sees as a positive step towards stability. He expressed hope for a "bright future" for Syria after what he described as a dark era under Assad’s rule.
  3. Priority on Syrian Refugees: Erdogan mentioned that creating conditions for the safe return of Syrian refugees is a top priority for Turkey. He acknowledged the significant number of Syrian refugees currently residing in Turkey and emphasized the need for their eventual return home.
  4. International Relations: In discussions with global leaders, including German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Erdogan has stressed the importance of unity and solidarity in Syria, advocating for a collaborative approach to rebuild and stabilize the country.
  5. Strategic Goals: Erdogan's administration aims to expand Turkey's influence in northern Syria while ensuring that it does not allow any division of Syrian territory. He has indicated that Turkey will not tolerate the emergence of new terrorist threats along its borders.

Conclusion​

Erdogan's remarks signal a pivotal moment for Turkey as it navigates its role in post-Assad Syria. The coming months will be critical not only for Turkey's domestic policies regarding refugees but also for its broader geopolitical strategy in the region. As Turkey seeks to assert its influence and ensure stability along its borders, these developments will likely have significant implications for both Turkish and regional politics.

1733918680648.jpeg
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom