What's new

Turkiye has started the warning bombardment to Syria

what do you mean you don't need to know who fired them?? heck then blame Australia fired them ?? just because they came from the south border of Turkey that doesn't mean the Syrian government fired it... and we already went over this why would Syrian government ask for NATO trouble??

really it's like someone kills your neighbor then you blame the whole neighborhood for it.. so no need to know who actually killed your neighbor :disagree:, and the whole neighborhood must go to jail and get punished

Like i said, it is either an accident by Syrian Army or provocation by FSA, in both scenerio, Turkey must first fire back, then think who it was.

Let me make it simple, who ever fire shells into Turkey needs to die. Australian? So be it.
 
.
Like i said, it is either an accident by Syrian Army or provocation by FSA, in both scenerio, Turkey must first fire back, then think who it was.

Let me make it simple, who ever fire shells into Turkey needs to die. Australian? So be it.


I agree with you, but your country is in bed with many different unions.

NATO

Russia China

Turkic Union


The Turks can never make a solid decision unless they break their ties with NATO.
 
.
Like i said, it is either an accident by Syrian Army or provocation by FSA, in both scenerio, Turkey must first fire back, then think who it was.

Let me make it simple, who ever fire shells into Turkey needs to die. Australian? So be it.

I ask again... the second shell on Hatay was also a mistake?? don't you think the Syrian government would be EXTRA CAUTIOUS where to fire?? because they don't want NATO...

again can you remind me how many Israeli soldier Turkey killed... because Israel killed Turkish citizens couple years ago..?
 
.
mhm lets your army in a battle field :coffee:

dude you're very funny... i don't know if this is like sarcasm or real... my friend the west has sanctions on Syria... and Syria can only turn to the east for its military... those sanction were put in place since 1980.... anyways now Syria makes their own ak under a license.... plus we make our own MISSILES...

still base on cheap weapon not like Steyr AUG
and tell me when the Russian weapon beat the american for example the old Iraqi army he was building his own tank where is it now ( Lion of Babylon tank) in the tanks grave year and you say that ak is a weapon me say ak he is a cheap rifle for cheap armies
 
.
still base on cheap weapon not like Steyr AUG
and tell me when the Russian weapon beat the american for example the old Iraqi army he was building his own tank where is it now ( Lion of Babylon tank) in the tanks grave year and you say that ak is a weapon me say ak he is a cheap rifle for cheap armies
:hitwall: reread post number 192
 
.
I ask again... the second shell on Hatay was also a mistake?? don't you think the Syrian government would be EXTRA CAUTIOUS where to fire?? because they don't want NATO...

again can you remind me how many Israeli soldier Turkey did... because Israel killed Turkish citizens couple years ago..?

I do think the Syrian government is extra cautious, but apparently it is not enough. Dude don't make me repeat myself over and over again. Mistake or not, FSA or Syrian Army, that doesn't matter...

I didn't answer that stupid question of yours not because i don't have an answer but because i won't bother to explain.
 
. .
I do think the Syrian government is extra cautious, but apparently it is not enough. Dude don't make me repeat myself over and over again. Mistake or not, FSA or Syrian Army, that doesn't matter...

I didn't answer that stupid question of yours not because i don't have an answer but because i won't bother to explain.
dude again it's wrong to kill a person because ASSUME he did it.... you need to know who killed the five innocent Turkish citizens then you are more then welcome to retaliate and it is your right to fire back.. but on the correct target... If Syrian Army has nothing to do with the issue then you have no right... and till this Syria is patient. Turkey is still shelling Syrian border they are thinking Syria will shell back.. but no Syria knows the game... Turkey wants Syria to shell back so NATO can get involved

Dude i'm really glad you are not a judge because everyone will die under your judgment....

i don't care i'm a full supporter to FSA and the western weapons
these is future ( bull pup )

Good for you.... it's funny how you admit that you are a supporter of Terrorism ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
dude again it's wrong to kill a person because ASSUME he did it.... you need to know who killed the five innocent Turkish citizens then you are more then welcome to retaliate and it is your right to fire back.. but on the correct target... If Syrian Army has nothing to do with the issue then you have no right... and till this Syria is patient. Turkey is still shelling Syrian border they are thinking Syria will shell back.. but no Syria knows the game... Turkey wants Syria to shell back so NATO can get involved

Dude i'm really glad you are not a judge because everyone will die under your judgment....



Good for you.... it's funny how you admit that you are a supporter of Terrorism ...

Is it really so hard to understand?

I said there are radars that can track where the shell fired from. What i'm saying is, we must retaliate to that particular location and eliminate those who fired it, not to the entire Syrian Army or FSA. Clear?
 
. .
Is it really so hard to understand?

I said there are radars that can track where the shell fired from. What i'm saying is, we must retaliate to that particular location and eliminate those who fired it, not the entire Syrian Army or FSA. Clear?

Turkey didn't fire back at the place where the shell was shot from... it fired back on targets... and they said Syrian Army Targets...

and since you have those radars... why didn't Turkey track the missile it was shot to bring down the Turkish jet? it can't because it was AA guns that shot it?? right

FSA is not terrorist group as there commander say that they will fight AL Qaeda

then what do you call those bombings in Damascus, Aleppo. and else where?? you call those freedom ?
 
. . .
Turkey didn't fire back at the place where the shell was shot from... it fired back on targets... and they said Syrian Army Targets...

and since you have those radars... why didn't Turkey track the missile it was shot to bring down the Turkish jet? it can't because it was AA guns that shot it?? right

I don't know where we fired and how many people were killed. Do you have a source about that? Which Syrian Army Targets?

Dude, do not jump to another topics, Mavi Marmara and now this... I haven't slept all night and barely writing these.
 
.
I don't know where we fired and how many people were killed. Do you have a source about that? Which Syrian Army Targets?

Dude, do not jump to another topics, Mavi Marmara and now this... I haven't slept all night and barely writing these.

there is a thread that talks about how many were killed

and i'm asking a questions because you brought up the story of the radar and how the can track shell... i'm assuming there are also radars that track missiles... and don't forget the American defense system for sure would have tracked the "missile" that Syria "fired" on the jet :coffee:
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom