-SINAN-
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2013
- Messages
- 16,746
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Now there had been wrong statements by some posters in this thread hence i will correct them.
1-) Our minister İsmet Yılmaz has clearly stated that integration of the missile to command & control system will be done by a Turkish firm. It will not be done by Chinese.
"UMBHFSS Projesi kapsamında sistemin TSK üst komuta kontrol kademeleri ile bağlantısına ve entegrasyonuna yönelik iş paketi milli olarak yetkilendirilmiş firma tarafından yurt içinde yapılacaktır. "
İsmet Yılmaz'dan önemli 'Füze Sistemi' açıklaması - Gündem Haberleri
2-) Turkey will never share any of info about NATO with the Chinese or vice versa. The moment we share Chinese defense products with our allies they will never enter our tenders again. But i believe F-35s will be tested by HQ-9 in the future for feedbacks.
3-) Oppositon party filled a questionaire to defense minister. They asked basically "You are favoring HQ-9 but NATO stated that they will not allow Chinese Missile to NATO systems in any circumtances. What is your solution ?"
And İsmet Yılmaz told them about the solution.
4-) Although HQ-9 has a very good chance, there is still chance for SSM to cancel the whole tender and gave the job to Rocketsan, a Turkish company. Roketsan is pressing SSM and Army for the contract and they are claiming that they can design/produce/deliver the whole system in 7 years. Eurosam's delivery time is also 7 years.
Arms industry - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1-) Our minister İsmet Yılmaz has clearly stated that integration of the missile to command & control system will be done by a Turkish firm. It will not be done by Chinese.
"UMBHFSS Projesi kapsamında sistemin TSK üst komuta kontrol kademeleri ile bağlantısına ve entegrasyonuna yönelik iş paketi milli olarak yetkilendirilmiş firma tarafından yurt içinde yapılacaktır. "
İsmet Yılmaz'dan önemli 'Füze Sistemi' açıklaması - Gündem Haberleri
2-) Turkey will never share any of info about NATO with the Chinese or vice versa. The moment we share Chinese defense products with our allies they will never enter our tenders again. But i believe F-35s will be tested by HQ-9 in the future for feedbacks.
3-) Oppositon party filled a questionaire to defense minister. They asked basically "You are favoring HQ-9 but NATO stated that they will not allow Chinese Missile to NATO systems in any circumtances. What is your solution ?"
And İsmet Yılmaz told them about the solution.
4-) Although HQ-9 has a very good chance, there is still chance for SSM to cancel the whole tender and gave the job to Rocketsan, a Turkish company. Roketsan is pressing SSM and Army for the contract and they are claiming that they can design/produce/deliver the whole system in 7 years. Eurosam's delivery time is also 7 years.
In 2013 Russia was the top weapons exporter followed by US, then China.HQ-9 is now outdated for the PLA. Newer systems are being introduced for the PLA.
Sell the Turks the HQ-9, earn money and prove China is a top weapons exporter to the world.
Arms industry - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Last edited by a moderator: