What's new

Tiananmen Square Massacre (1989)

Amazing - Mao's collusion with the Japanese - truth finally comes out. Then they cover up by blaming Japanese.


8 years Sino-Japanese war is not a continuous fighting affair, but rather a long mostly peaceful 8 years, punctuated by occasional flared up of fighting.

During this time, KMT, Japs and CPC were mostly in peace, and they even trade with one another. I know this is very diametrically opposite to the descriptions on textbook.

And more bizarre, the overstretch Japanese found themselves not being able to supply their troops. The troops traded weapon with CPC for food. This was instrumental for the rise of CPC after WW2.

Eventually CPC got so familiar on the ground that the first moment Japanese surrender, they rush and loot the Japanese armoury, and overnights, they became invincible. The Japanese commanders did not stop CPC, and in fact, large numbers of Japanese joined CPC in fighting the KMT. Today CPC only disclosed she had large numbers of Japanese medical corps in the ranks.

The Japanese weapon was instrumental in the defeat of USA in Korean War, while the USSR weapon finally arrived and equipped in meaningful amount only during the 4th Korean campaign.

Meanwhile the Japanese field commanders and KMT are friends and buddy also, during peaceful time.

The implications are, absence of vile politician creating wars and murders, the field soldiers can get along well, even though they were supposed to kill one another.
 
.
Japanese and CPC relationship in wartime is a favorite topic to smear Mao. A lot of people portray Mao as a traitor eager to sell out Chinese war effort. In reality it was the other way round. The Japanese was desperate for a deal with CPC, being harassed 24x7 by guerillas.

At that time CPC cannot fight effectively. They were backwards in weapon. So their strategy was to buy up Japanese light arms with food.
 
.
Chairman Deng Xiaoping smartly defended CPC and China even at a very old age. East Europeans neither had leaders like Chairman Deng nor they are smart like Chinese people. So, the East Europeans became the satellites of NATO and EU (Big Four).
 
.
Chairman Deng Xiaoping smartly defended CPC and China even at a very old age. East Europeans neither had leaders like Chairman Deng nor they are smart like Chinese people. So, the East Europeans became the satellites of NATO and EU (Big Four).

There was at least 3 army group in Beijing, the 38th, 27th, 15th, in total 200 thousands soldiers. Deng could have used ask everyone of them to throw one tear gas, and the crowd will disperse in no time.

However, Deng make the difficult decision to kill people, calculating that it will quell any political movement once and for all. He reckon that no one after him can make the decision to kill. Deng also need the killing to set the stage for massive purge in his party. His successors are all career party members. Deng was a career soldiers who led 10 army groups in war.

In the event China collapse upon more unrest, Deng will be vilified as the worst mofos in China history. However if China can prosper and advance, and even overtake USA, Deng will be glorify.

Now 30 years after Deng's gamble, we can say he won the bet.
 
.
Comes again.
Why you Chinese haters pretend to be care about our Chinese people?
Don't you feel yourself hypocritical?
I am very glad that this color revolution sponsored by CIA was failed.
Thanks CPC not making us another Iraq or Afghanistan.
I was there. Before 6/4, there was no civilian violence. Society was largely in peace. Violence only erupted when the army marched in.
Since you said you are there, I want to know your comment about the student leaders.
 
.
As a reminder, more than 159 Indian farmers was killed by Indian government in 2021 farmer protests.
Why you guys not focus on the on going massacre?
Indians Lives Matter!!!
 
.
You don't know what analogies are used for?
Are you related to those TRAITORS WORKING TO BRING DOWN CHINA for the IMPERIAL COLONIALISTS as what happened to the USSR?
Working for the 5 EYES to perpetually SUPPRESS THE CHINESE PEOPLES.
.

For the 5 EYES, it is NOT HISTORY, but murdering people, especially your fellow Muslims, is what they do BEST all around the world for centuries and CURRENTLY in Syria, Iraq, Yemen etc.
.

There is absolutely no reason to think Chinese are going to be any better than what you are accusing the West of. Chinese are spending over a trillion $ on BRI, China will do everything including using military power to protect those investments.

I see bots like you swarming all over the place just like the Indian RSS bots. This is usually the first step to control the narrative.
 
.
There is absolutely no reason to think Chinese are going to be any better than what you are accusing the West of. Chinese are spending over a trillion $ on BRI, China will do everything including using military power to protect those investments.

I see bots like you swarming all over the place just like the Indian RSS bots. This is usually the first step to control the narrative.
Huh?
Don't be so quick to judge what others will do based on your experience with your WHITE MASTERS.

Things should be better though.
The Chinese had not GENOCIDED ANY NATIVES and taken over their land like the USA, CANADA and AUSTRALIA.
Or MASSACRED Vietnamese, Iraqis, Syrians, Afghanistans, thousands of miles away or COLONIZED HALF THE WORLD.

One more thing is others are not BOTS just because you are A BOT swarming all over the place.
.
 
.
Huh?
Don't be so quick to judge what others will do based on your experience with your WHITE MASTERS.

Things should be better though.
The Chinese had not GENOCIDED ANY NATIVES and taken over their land like the USA, CANADA and AUSTRALIA.
Or MASSACRED Vietnamese, Iraqis, Syrians, Afghanistans, thousands of miles away or COLONIZED HALF THE WORLD.

One more thing is others are not BOTS just because you are A BOT swarming all over the place.
.

Let us look at the facts:

1) China is in the process of spending more than a Trillion $ under BRI.
2) The investments are all international.
3) There were projects that failed to cover the debt payments whereby China took over the completed project as agreed on contracts.
4) China doesn't control SWIFT payment clearance system.

My point is some of the infrastructure built under those projects will fail to make money, what if some of those nations also refuses to handover those infrastructure to China ? How will China enforce the agreement where it can secure its interest ?
Those islands China built are full of military installations and equipment.

With so much at stake its naïve to think China will keep rising peacefully.
 
. .
There was at least 3 army group in Beijing, the 38th, 27th, 15th, in total 200 thousands soldiers. Deng could have used ask everyone of them to throw one tear gas, and the crowd will disperse in no time.

However, Deng make the difficult decision to kill people, calculating that it will quell any political movement once and for all. He reckon that no one after him can make the decision to kill. Deng also need the killing to set the stage for massive purge in his party. His successors are all career party members. Deng was a career soldiers who led 10 army groups in war.

In the event China collapse upon more unrest, Deng will be vilified as the worst mofos in China history. However if China can prosper and advance, and even overtake USA, Deng will be glorify.

Now 30 years after Deng's gamble, we can say he won the bet.
Not entirely true. Who would order blood to be spill in a place called Tian An Men or the gate of heaven ?
Chinese culture is all about the Mandate of Heaven. That is why no one died at the square.
 
.
Let us look at the facts:

1) China is in the process of spending more than a Trillion $ under BRI.
2) The investments are all international.
3) There were projects that failed to cover the debt payments whereby China took over the completed project as agreed on contracts.
4) China doesn't control SWIFT payment clearance system.

My point is some of the infrastructure built under those projects will fail to make money, what if some of those nations also refuses to handover those infrastructure to China ? How will China enforce the agreement where it can secure its interest ?
Those islands China built are full of military installations and equipment.

With so much at stake its naïve to think China will keep rising peacefully.
My point is some of the infrastructure built under those projects will fail to make money, what if some of those nations also refuses to handover those infrastructure to China ?
Not sure HOW OLD YOU ARE?
Maybe in your DREAM WORLD, all ventures have to succeed, no failed business.
You try to borrow money from the bank and fail to pay up.
See what will happen to your collateral.

NO RISK NO GAIN.
So many Chinese businesses gone bankrupt but you didn't hear about them.
My business closed because of cheap Chinese imports.
I don't blame them, that's what happens in business.

For COWARDS LIKE YOU, don't ever do business or risk venture, stay in your CALL CENTER JOB.
Don't think others are WITHOUT INTEGRITY LIKE YOU to refuse responsibility to what they signed up to.
Nobody will build infrastructure for a PERSON WITHOUT TRUST and INTEGRITY LIKE YOU, problem solved.
.
 
.
Not sure HOW OLD YOU ARE?
Maybe in your DREAM WORLD, all ventures have to succeed, no failed business.
You try to borrow money from the bank and fail to pay up.
See what will happen to your collateral.

NO RISK NO GAIN.
So many Chinese businesses gone bankrupt but you didn't hear about them.
My business closed because of cheap Chinese imports.
I don't blame them, that's what happens in business.

For COWARDS LIKE YOU, don't ever do business or risk venture, stay in your CALL CENTER JOB.
Don't think others are WITHOUT INTEGRITY LIKE YOU to refuse responsibility to what they signed up to.
Nobody will build infrastructure for a PERSON WITHOUT TRUST and INTEGRITY LIKE YOU, problem solved.
.

Calm down.

The events in the international geopolitics will play out as they do. What I think or you think will have a little impact on it.

However we can talk objectively about it.

Failed BRI projects will be the point of contention in the future.

All conflicts in BRI projects are to be arbitrated in China.

Some nation just may not agree to give up their infrastructure even if is the contract. China didn't care much about South China sea maritime ruling.
As things happen, whenever there is a conflict it just may invite a third party ( The West ) in the conflict.

The main difference between a BRI project and a project by world Bank is there are no political conditions attached to BRI. BRI projects have higher interest rates with longer payback terms.
 
.
Huh?
Don't be so quick to judge what others will do based on your experience with your WHITE MASTERS.

Things should be better though.
The Chinese had not GENOCIDED ANY NATIVES and taken over their land like the USA, CANADA and AUSTRALIA.
Or MASSACRED Vietnamese, Iraqis, Syrians, Afghanistans, thousands of miles away or COLONIZED HALF THE WORLD.

One more thing is others are not BOTS just because you are A BOT swarming all over the place.
.
REally..... how about the China Famine. Let us start with that first. Communists never do anything bad do they.. actually they are the perfect liars who tell the truth; anyone who says likewise is eliminated. Therefore you get conformity and bots. Simple mathmatical equation.

Man, this forum has been over run - it is time to get Doom spray going.
 
.
REally..... how about the China Famine. Let us start with that first. Communists never do anything bad do they.. actually they are the perfect liars who tell the truth; anyone who says likewise is eliminated. Therefore you get conformity and bots. Simple mathmatical equation.

Man, this forum has been over run - it is time to get Doom spray going.
Lucky for the US and all those resource rich STOLEN COLONIES, including South Africa of course, mostly never experienced famine.
Famine is common everywhere else, unless you are talking about the IMPERIALIST COLONIZER INDUCED FAMINE IN BENGAL.

Wow SO MUCH HATE FOR CHINA OOZING FROM YOU, even for their famines.

And why should you dispense a NEGATIVE to me to suggest that @fallstuff is COWARDLY in Business Risk and LACK OF INTEGRITY to advocate for nations to default on their obligations to infrastructure building agreements?
Any thoughts on this @waz
.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom