Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
nah this is just part of the problem
I repeat there is a missing piece in the whole puzzle: Who was behind all the organized protests which aimed to topple the Government and turned it into Libya, Tunisia, a disintegration of Yugoslavia, Soviet Union .. ?
Most of the students were tragic pawns. Dont be naive!
^^^ only a Turd blossom brainwashed Chini will look at video and say "no, since my brainwashers have not confirmed it is all fake! "
^^^ dimwit chini the micro blog is showing/reporting videos being shown all over china of what took place. They did not make up the scenario. The news is 100% true.
I don't think it is very hard to believe that there are factions within CCP as it is in any political party. It is naive to think that there weren't element within CCP that want to profit from the student movement.People usually don't buy conspiracy theory, so if you want to convince people that there are more sinister elements behind he protests, you have to do thorough investigation and make it public. Otherwise, the CCP government's image will be forever tarnished. Also please do not bring in Syria, Yugoslavia etc, since I don't care and I don't know the details of their protests. It would be ignorant for me to compare them with China.
As I said, the government was just immature, inexperienced in dealing with protests. They thought they could achieve the end results by any means, but they forgot that bad image can haunt them for eternity, when you consider China has kept our historical records since time immemorial.
^^^
See how orderly the Chinese people are?
And no police hitting protectors with sticks?
Unlike the Indians.
^^^ only a Turd blossom brainwashed Chini will look at video and say "no, since my brainwashers have not confirmed it is all fake! "
Can't wait for you to get banned. We all know its only a matter of time. Maybe you can come back with your 'Korean' double account.
only a naïve deluded curry b@g who feels too ashamed to be an indian and now lives in a modern world can understand the meaning of not living in a slum
have you taken my suggestion to venture to that $hity place of your origin?
You are right that some people of HK look down at mainland Chinese. But these same people would treat Indian much worse, much worse than Filipinos or Vietnamese, which they would treat worse than mainland Chinese. And maybe even worse than Africans.
The Gate of Heavenly Peace (Chinese: 天安门; pinyin: Tiānānmén) is a 1995 documentary film, produced by Richard Gordon and Carma Hinton, about the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989.
The Gate of Heavenly Peace sparked controversy before it had even been completed. The film was part of a growing debate over the history of 1989; according to an article that appeared in The New York Times on April 30, 1995, a central question for many in the student movement, and for some historians, is whether moderation gave way to extremism during those six weeks and whether the more radical student leaders spurned opportunities to declare victory by ending the demonstrations and preserving, perhaps, the reformist trend that was still a prominent feature of the Chinese leadership."[5]
The New York Times article also quoted from a controversial interview that was used in The Gate of Heavenly Peace. On May 28, 1989, just days before the massacre, American journalist Philip Cunningham interviewed one of the student movements most prominent leaders, Chai Ling. In this interview, Chai indicated that the hidden strategy of the leadership group she dominated was to provoke the Government to violence against the unarmed students. With statements [in the interview] like What we are actually hoping for is bloodshed and Only when the square is awash with blood will the people of China open their eyes, Ms. Chai denounced those students who sought to bring an end to the occupation of the square. (op. cit.) The May 28, 1989 interview was undertaken at Chai Ling's request. She then asked Cunningham to release it internationally as her political statement on the student movement. The Gate of Heavenly Peace makes extensive use of this interview (necessitated in part by Chai Lings repeated refusal to be interviewed for the film).[6]
The filmmakers suggest that the hard-liners within the government marginalized moderates among the protesters (including students, workers and intellectuals), while the actions of radical protesters undermined moderates in the government. Moderate voices were gradually cowed and then silenced by extremism and emotionalism on both sides.[7] In following the fate of these moderate voices, the film raises questions about some of the decisions that were made by a few of the student leaders. For this, the film was angrily condemned by many in the Chinese exile community, including Chai Ling herself. For example, in April 1995well before the film had even been completed (it premiered in October 1995) -- Chai wrote, "Certain individuals, for the sake of gaining approval of the [Chinese] authorities, have racked their brains for ways and means to come up with policies for them. And there is another person with a pro-Communist history [Hinton] who has been hawking [her] documentary film for crude commercial gain by taking things out of context and trying to show up something new, unreasonably turning history on its head and calling black white."[8]
the Epoch Times? The mouth piece of Falun Gong?