The irony is that Indians are always forthcoming to question,Pakistani version of history but never answer about theirs. India is one nation that feeds a screwed version of history to its citizens, most importantly how they present Pakistan's independence.
India has its citizens believe in a rather absurd notion, that Pakistan somehow was 'given' and not to forget that it was a 'mistake'. I am yet to meet 'one' Indian who accepts Pakistan's God given right to self determination. India also presents Pakistan as a product of communal animosity which is absurd,because Pakistan came into being as the result of a democratic process.
India also presents the absurd notion that 'Pakistan was part of India'....couldn't be any further from the truth. As a matter of fact 'India' what modern day Indians believe it to be 'never existed'. Before the Colonial period,it was divided into princely states which existed by paying "Khiraj" to the most powerful kingdom or dynasty, before that it was divided into multiple small or medium kingdoms who always fought each other for supremacy.
India is quick to hide the historical fact,that India has only existed as a large empire, which included Bangladesh,Pakistan and Afghanistan, under Ashoka and some periods of Moghal empire, and either of whom didn't last for more than a century and they were kept united under a sword. Internal feuds lead to its subsequent fragmentation once again.
India also hides from its citizens the fact that the real, reason for the partition of the sub continent was the Hindutva aspirations which lead Jinnah, once the champion of Hindu Muslim unity for 16 years, to leave the INC. India uses secularism as a veil to hide the fact that India is a Hindu state and the Hindu elite who now want to come out of the closet and wish to create a Hindutva state existed in early 1900s too.
All of Indian, symbolism is derived from Mahabharatha, ie weapon titles, the Indian flag has Ashoka chakara and he coat of Arms belongs to Ashoka. Suffice to say that, India is oblivious of providing any symbolic recognition to either the Muslims,Sikhs or Christians who also are its citizens and in large numbers.
As for the wars.
* 1948 was a stalemate
* 1965 was a stalemate
* 1971 was a defeat for Pakistan,being outnumbered 1-25. [Big deal]
* 1999 was a limited conflict with no territorial changes.
Indians are quick to claim triumf which depicts their sense of insecurity, even when they haven't scored an outright victory on their own. In 1971, a vast majority of E.Pakistani rebels were Bangali Mukhti Bahini, NOT Indians, they invaded when it suited them.
On the other side, Germans don't teach Nazi history. They had to go through a rigid de-nazification campaign, Australians/Canadians/Americans don't like to talk about the Aboriginals and Indians and what happened to them, Kiwis don't like to talk about the Mauri tribes and their historic treatment, Americans don't talk about Vietnam, bombing of Japan and the slaves. Everyone has something to hide, not just Pakistan.
End note: I'd like to see more recognition of Gandhara and Indus Valley heritage of Pakistan more than it is recognized today in Pakistan.