What's new

The Last Six Months

I have a little theory about how Christian theology was use as a tool in a recent war. Maybe I'm wrong, but here it goes:

George W Bush is known because he's a Christian nutjob, maybe in 2003 Iraq war he was deceived by some people who made him believe that he was fulfilling Christian prophecies about Babylon (Iraq) destruction, to make him feel less guilty for that nonsense war.

Of course that doesnt mean that the prophecy is the cause of war, but religious prophecies can be used to make people support some act.
 
.
In Christian eschatology is quoted a lot of times "Babylon".

Of course Babylon doesnt exist since thousands years ago, even before of Christianity existence.

So it must be some another thing.

Christianity treats Babylon like a future event, of the end of times. Unlike Jewish religion, where the same writings are no taken as a future event.

Well, once said all that.

Remember who beat Babylon in Jewish writings, the only non-Jew that's called anointed in Bible: a Persian: Cyrus the great.
Perhaps babylon mean iraq or mesopotamia. In shia end of the time books some major battles will happend in iraq and syria and sofyanee will lose.
After victory of imam mahdi and jesus army, biggest building in world in iraq (between cities of najaf and karbala ) will be build for governing of world.

Also destruction of world will happened many years after victory of Good people in earth.
 
Last edited:
.
Perhaps babylon mean iraq or mesopotamia. In shia end of the time books some major battles will happend in iraq and syria and sofyanee will lose.
After victory of imam mahdi and jesus army, biggest building in world in iraq (between cities of najaf and karbala ) will be build for governing of world.

Also destruction of world will happened many years after victory of Good people in earth.
In Christian eschatology "Babylon" is a big power, and I dont think Iraq will rule the world in the next milleniums :lol:.

Keep in mind, It's the Babylon of Jewish Babylonian captivity. And the Jewish elite is now in USA.

Babylon was protected by two rivers, USA is protected by two oceans.


For your merchants were the tycoons of the world, because all the nations[a] were deceived by your magic spells! Rev 18:23

But from a defense point of view, it doesnt matter what is the correct interpretation (if such thing exists :lol:), what matters is what most of people (and some leaders) thinks about it and how they can be handled deceiving them using those beliefs.

 
.
Revelation

The book of Revelation ("Apokalypsis" in Greek) is written after "Kitos war", and is written against Rome, the "Beast", "Babylon".

 
.
...

Landing of Caligula's Legions at the port of Ptolemaida

Mark (ca. 40-66)

Menahem - "no more lord that the Lord" - slits the throat of the high priest Ananus the young son of Ananus the old father-in-law of Caiapha. The sons of the Sadducee priestly aristocracy kill Menahem "after subjecting him to many torments", giving rise to "the events that occurred among us"

Matthew (ca. 80)
Luke (ca. 100)

Kitos war

Revelation
 
.
The prophecy of the Nazarenes said: the Sadducees priests would be beheaded, and they were beheaded by "the people of the land", the Temple would be destroyed, and it was destroyed by the legions of Rome, and the Masiah would come, and he did not come.

And then they thought that perhaps it would be necessary to wait a thousand years, and when the deadline was reached in the year 1033, a great crisis of the Christian conscience took place, which on the one hand provoked the Crusades and on the other hand launched the way of SantYago


Wikipedia is wrong

Wikipedia is wrong. Arabic sources say that James is "like our Mecca" because "there they say that the son of the carpenter is buried": the brother of Jesus, "James the Just", who was stoned by order of the high priest Ananus the Younger.
 
.
The tremendous thing is that history is back to square one in the land of Canaan:

the fracture between the dominant lords and "the people of the land" subjugated
 
.
Revelation

The book of Revelation ("Apokalypsis" in Greek) is written after "Kitos war", and is written against Rome, the "Beast", "Babylon".

Yes, that's the traditional interpretation, Babylon = Rome.

But I think Rome is not longer so important like in the past.


You who reside by abundant water,
rich in treasures,
your end has come,
your life thread is cut.
Jer 51:13


USA most important defensive feature is the same than Babylon, they are between waters (rivers, oceans).

And like in Babylon captivity, Jewish elite lives there. IQ average difference between American-Ashkenazim and about Israeli-Ashkenazim is about 15 points higher the Americans.

And like in Babylon captivity, Iran, Persia, it's the current big problem of USA.

Iran war seemed almost started in 2011/2012 Hormuz tensions, but Americans retreated and they didnt nothing.


And the woman that you saw is the great city that has dominion over the kings of the earth.
Rev 17:18


That only could be a superpower, it's not Iraq, it's not current Rome.
 
Last edited:
.
"the great city that has dominion over the kings of the earth"

was Rome

and now in the last version of the Roman Empire (Biblical-Roman Empire 1967 or AngloEmpire 2.0) is Washington DC
 
.
Roman Empire 1.0 Rome
Big Crisis (250-300)
Roman Empire 2.0 Constantinopla

...

AngloEmpire 1.0 London
Big Crisis (1914-1949)
AngloEmpire 2.0 Washington

...

And the Portuguese, Spanish, French, British and American empires are all versions of the Roman Empire 2.0 and its fusion of imperial ideology and Aramaic fantasies from Persian times.
 
.
...

The Roman empire (ca. 400-600) fell in love with the bloody Aramaic fantasies and saw clearly that it was true religion

The Aramaic pamphlets say that there is a dominant people chosen by the gods, a "HerrenVolk" we would say in German, "a people (of lords)", called to dominate "the people of the land" ("am ha'eretz") which in the original version of this film refers to the first-born: the Arab-Hebrew population of "the land of Canaan"
 
.
In other words

Mike Pompeo and Anthony Blinken have the same Software installed in their brains:

The imperial Software, a fusion of Roman imperial ideology and Aramaic fantasies of Persian times.
 
.
Khorasani and yamani in shia islam are very important.
Both of them are good people and every real muslims should join them.

Khorasani mean a person from khorasan. Khorasan in islamic era was this image:
نقشه_خراسان.jpg

But khorasan in sassanid era was a persian province and it was eastern iran and parts of afghanistan and Turkmenistan now.
Screenshot_۲۰۲۳۰۳۱۵_۱۵۲۳۲۳.jpg

Yamani also mean a person from yemen.

Many religious people in iran think khorasani mean leader of islamic republic of iran and yamani mean leader of houthi movement (ansar allah) in yemen but its just a Possibility.
 
Last edited:
.
I have a little theory about how Christian theology was use as a tool in a recent war. Maybe I'm wrong, but here it goes:

George W Bush is known because he's a Christian nutjob, maybe in 2003 Iraq war he was deceived by some people who made him believe that he was fulfilling Christian prophecies about Babylon (Iraq) destruction, to make him feel less guilty for that nonsense war.

Of course that doesnt mean that the prophecy is the cause of war, but religious prophecies can be used to make people support some act.

The way I see it, the issue is not that political leaders may have eschatological religious beliefs but what those beliefs entail in some cases.

First off, there's a difference between passive messianism - the arrival of the saviour does not suppose any specific actions to be taken by the faithful; and active messianism - the idea that in order to bring about or hasten the messiah's advent, there are certain expectations believers need to conform to.

This said, not every form of active messianism is deviant or warmongering. Some religious Iranians supportive of the Islamic Revolution for instance believe that Imam Mahdi's (aj.) return can be accelerated if they increase their efforts in being good virtuous Moslems. A more political belief suggests that they should struggle in pursuit of the goals of the Islamic Revolution.

However, this must be done within a defined framework of what is permissible and what isn't. In Iran's case, religious principles as understood by officials of the Islamic Republic, definitely prohibit waging offensive war of conquest. So there's no risk that the Iranian Leadership out of messianist motivations would order military aggression like the US regime's invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Where active messianism becomes dangerous is when it based on incorrect interpretations of religion, namely when:

1) Its adherents consider offensive war to be justifiable.

2) In an even more twisted and namely antinomianist way, consider that it's permissible to directly contribute to the conditions prevailing during the final days as described in religious scriptures - knowing that said conditions are marked by a profusion of sins, by chaos and wars. In other terms, instigate wars and promote sinful behaviour among the people because supposedly this would create the conditions for the messiah's manifestation and thus shorten the remaining time.

In this context, I'd suggest researching the topic of false Jewish prophets such as Sabbatai Zevi (Tsvi) and Jacob Frank (who proclaimed to be a reincarnation of the former), and the political influence they had.
 
Last edited:
.
This thread is frankly embarrassing and comprises the ramblings of lunatics. Respectfully.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom