Can anyone over here tell me abt a single system on JF 17 which is ingeniously developed in pakistan ( seriously i searched a lot bt cudn;t find one )
Its really strange how the elite members of this forum are taking active part in trolling fest, Such jobless, Awesome!!!!!
May be its their bread n butter to post only craps over here.
Too much of excitation as if some breakthrough has been achieved in aerospace engineering which can change the face of all aviation industry across the world. A country which doesn't even have any premium research center or institute, publishing phd papers on aeronautics on a forum of discourse.
Some Facts:
As TEJAS uses composite fiber in its maximum portion of the body ( remember material is one of the single most critical tech in modern aeronautics) and as it got a twin seater trainer and a NAVAL variant .it is already steps ahead of another aircraft in
light section across the world not only JF 17.
Those r having the sagacity to compare JF and LCA, its for them:
LCA is completely transparent, indigenous effort to bring a country's aerospace engineering and industry to a international level. A lot of sweaty efforts of various institute, r&d org and users has been invested in this project, its not like a complete fuselage shipment in a transport aircraft from a foreign country. Ups n Dwns r der but at EOD we r getting results of our genuine effort.
Where as JF is a completely Chinese product (with some western avionics) successfully assembled in pakistan. India/HAL already have achieved a lot in this license manufacturing field and delivered all those in numbers also. It has been doing so since the MIG-21 era Even russian have inducted our modified SU-30s in to their AF. So those who blabbers a lot about 66 operational pieces, they need to do lot more to catch up with the regional players.
A low tech license production and induction in numbers is a nut job now a days in india.
May be both of the aircraft JF-17 and LCA have been build for same kind of role with in same weight class but certainly they both differs in their purpose and priorities.