brational
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2011
- Messages
- 325
- Reaction score
- 0
The AMLCD configuration is derived from what was originally designed for the Su-35. It will apply to the Super Su-30MKI as well. As for new-generation air-to-ground PGMs as and when they become available from Russia or elsewhere, depending on the operational reqmts, they will be easily integrated with the Super Su-30MKI's navigation-and-attack system due to its open-architecture design. The Su-30MKI can presently accommodate only one BrahMos in its underbelly without any structural modifications to the airframe. But since the IAF has specified that it wants two underwing-mounted BrahMos missiles to be carried by a Su-30MKI, IAF-specific structural modifications to the Su-30MKI airframe are required.
Also to be noted is that the IAF has gone for the distributed AESA-array configuration (for the mini-AEW & C role) primarily as a back-up capability just in case the DRDO/CABS is unable to deliver the indigenous AEW & CS on time. In addition, have an embedded mini-AEW & C capability within a strike package oriented towards offensive air campaigns has some unique advantages aimed at neutralising the force-multiplier capabilities offered by hostile AEW & C platforms. This is an entirely standalone issue that I will dwell upon in future.-Prasun K. Sengupta
AESA is cofirmed. But there is a huge fight goin b/w Irkut and HAL on Brahmos configuration.. Sukhoi is asking for too much of money where DRDO/HAL scientists are confident that they can do the job with half of what sukhoi is asking for.. Another glitch is that Sukhoi is not allowing HAL to make the modifications.