Utter nonsense, there isn't a market anywhere in the world for 400 new helos of this type a year.
Source is Reuters.Not ToI
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Utter nonsense, there isn't a market anywhere in the world for 400 new helos of this type a year.
General characteristics
Performance
- Crew: 2
- Capacity: up to 6 passengers
- Empty weight: 1,675 kg (3,693 lb)
- Powerplant: 1 × HAL/Turbomeca Shakti 1U turboshaft engine, 1,272 kW (1,706 hp)
- Maximum speed: 280 km/h (174 mph; 151 kn)
- Cruising speed: 240 km/h (149 mph; 130 kn)
- Never exceed speed: 330 km/h (205 mph; 178 kn)
- Range: 351 km; 189 nmi (218 mi)
- Service ceiling: 6,492 m (21,300 ft)
Hey I got your photograph while standing near a indianReferring to myself, "most indians "I" meet, are smaller than me.
Come on man talk with some sense, Are you implying you were getting Block 60 and you still take block 52 of F16, have you compare with your ME brother F 16-Block60 with your own F 16. Or you think India rejected F16 block60 in MMRCA deal so it is inferior to your F16.Did that hurt your feelings my little indian friend.
Are you high.................... What stupid one liner you keep on making. If you want to talk something then stay otherwise get hell out of the forum, You are completely derailing the forum.I am deeply saddened and chastened that I hurt your emotional well being, my diminutive person of indian extraction amicus.
yes we did !India rejected F16 block60 in MMRCA deal
how fascinating. .. oh my.. you are still claiming lots of stuff without any source. .. absorbing tech??
Completely unrelated and rather poor answer .. and Im enjoying being blunt in this. the Chechen conflict had NO relation to the conflicts the Russians were foreseeing with the T-80, nor was it just the tank that had the problem when the employment itself was suicidal.. and clearly this is not how and where Pakistan will use them... so should I conclude that most of the time you are half assing on posts ? I believe you can do better.U will find the answers in chechnya war and the failure of t-80 in urban environment.
Completely unrelated and rather poor answer .. and Im enjoying being blunt in this. the Chechen conflict had NO relation to the conflicts the Russians were foreseeing with the T-80, nor was it just the tank that had the problem when the employment itself was suicidal.. and clearly this is not how and where Pakistan will use them... so should I conclude that most of the time you are half assing on posts ? I believe you can do better.
The issue with the T-80 was the gas turbine engine and its fallacies in combat. That problem was rectified with the T-80UD(and more recently with the T-84 Oplot. The T-80UD was the solution to the issues faced at Grozny regarding the engine. The reason the T-80 went was much more to do with the embarrassing situation the Russian generals had themselves set up which ended up with bad press for the tank rather than the Tank itself.. by contrast the T-72 was under much greater massacre in Chechnya..
But Chechnya is was not the plains or Europe.. nor it the Thar Desert.
All things considered, the T-80UDs purchased by Pakistan came in the mid-90s whilst the current debate is on what else the Russians might have on offer.
I'm 6'4" my little Pakistani pherend
the recent Iraq army vs. ISIS footage also doesn't do any favour to the Abram tank marketing.U will find the answers in chechnya war and the failure of t-80 in urban environment.