Protest on Ramiz Raja's comment intensfies

[doppelganger]

Islam is strictly against racism and so called nation hood only based on ethnicity or language Islam nation hood is based on faith in ALLAH and to be loyal slaves of his PROPHET SAW

If Islamic nationhood is based on faith in Allah and all 57 Islamic countries believe and have faith in Allah, then why 57 countries? On what basis? Why not a single Islamic nationhood based on the collective faith in Allah? In efffect, why not a Caliphate of the Ummah?

 

[Zarvan]

If Islamic nationhood is based on faith in Allah and all 57 Islamic countries believe and have faith in Allah, then why 57 countries? On what basis? Why not a single Islamic nationhood based on the collective faith in Allah? In efffect, why not a Caliphate of the Ummah?

Ideally there should one big country Caliphate is finally and ultimate goal which is needed to be achieve

 

[doppelganger]

Ideally there should one big country Caliphate is finally and ultimate goal which is needed to be achieve

So was Jinnah wrong and un-Islamic?

 

[I.R.A]

@doppelganger oh yar this is no big deal, Bangalis are trying to be drama queen here

At times, his disparagement was bordering on the ridiculous. When seamer-allrounder Soumya Sarkar came on to bowl against the Afghans, Rameez referred to him as “Sumaiya Sarkar” - a mistake which is really unbecoming of a top commentator. Not only that, he is probably the only commentator in the world who calls Shakib al Hasan “Sakibul”. Not known for toning down, Rameez also refers to every Bangladesh cricketer with the name Rahman as “Rehman”

Whatever pronunciation he has used I would do the same, what is the bid deal? We pronounce like that. English commentators make a mess of our names, we don't go all crazy on that. e.g. Imran Khan is somewhat Emran Kan for them................... so ????

 

[Proudpakistaniguy]

If Islamic nationhood is based on faith in Allah and all 57 Islamic countries believe and have faith in Allah, then why 57 countries? On what basis? Why not a single Islamic nationhood based on the collective faith in Allah? In efffect, why not a Caliphate of the Ummah?

Ummah is ideological bond and non muslims often misinterpret it one country for all muslims..use commmon sense how can african countries or pakistan can be one country when there is so much distance between them..ideological bond is caring other muslims no matter where he live ..

 

[Zarvan]

So was Jinnah wrong and un-Islamic?

No first goad was to avoid level best to come under rule of kufr so going for Pakistan was the right thing to do we had to first have an independent state

 

[doppelganger]

@doppelganger oh yar this is no big deal, Bangalis are trying to be drama queen here

Yes I know bro. I like Rameez.

This is a pure troll thread. Enjoy.

 

[Zarvan]

Ummah is ideological bond and non muslims often misinterpret it one country for all muslims..use commmon sense how can african countries or pakistan can be one country when there is so much distance between them..ideological bond is caring other muslims no matter where he live ..

One state can be done

 

[Proudpakistaniguy]

One state can be done

Yea in your dream and imagination while its not possible in reality

 

[doppelganger]

No first goad was to avoid level best to come under rule of kufr so going for Pakistan was the right thing to do we had to first have an independent state

But he compromised on Muslim lands. By leaving them with the kufr.

Was that wrong and un-Islamic? Should he and his followers have done Jihad for those they left behind?

 

[halupridol]

Oo koi video link toh post karo,,,dekhe to ki hua kya,,,most probably its just a case of pendu humor gone wrong.. Ramiz Raja is not badtameez.

 

[Force-India]

One state can be done

And what is the use of it?

 

[Musafir117]

The emergence of India and Pakistan as major cricketing countries came during the 90s. Pakistan as well as India had a decent, not best, team those days. Bear in mind that the likes of Gavaskar and MAK Pataudi were playing for India in that era. But the little extra was missing.

bangladesh was only an associate in 1977, much like Ireland and UAE are today. They were not a full fledged memeber. But still it shows the lack of cricketing ability in them.

Ireland has time and again played well. In 3 world cups they had three victories against major ICC countries. Pakistan, England and now WI. If not test status then at least Ireland deserves more exposure from ICC. If they can bet on a team like bangladesh they can as well support any other team.



The scorecard says 287-5 and 40 needed of 22 balls. The bangladeshis scored 326 against Pakistan?

Results | Asia Cup | ESPN Cricinfo
The BD was holding that game while Pakistan was in critical position but when Afridi came he play so aggressively and he score 59 in which only 1 was single and other was boundaries, check the link @India-Force sorry my mistake, the final was between SL and Pakistan and SL won the final. The photo we discussing the match which was in BD hands but Afridi snatch it away which make all Bengalis shocked.

 

[jaunty]

Ramiz "Rambo" Raja can be erratic and unintentionally funny but he does not have any malicious intent. He is a good man.

 

[Zarvan]

But he compromised on Muslim lands. By leaving them with the kufr.

Was that wrong and un-Islamic? Should he and his followers have done Jihad for those they left behind?

No he didn't he tried his level best to get as many as he could and he did a great job

Yea in your dream and imagination while its not possible in reality

Its fully possible in reality mate. Just to obsessed with west and what ever lie they tell few people in our lands fall for that.