What's new

PM Modi raises issue of Pakistan-sponsored terror in meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping

At the very least you have admitted KBY to be a spy. However if the spy is providing funding to those running suicide squads, it makes him a terrorist as well.

As for you harping on about 26/11, there's absolutely no proof of ISI/PA/Pak-Gov behind it.

But you Hallucinating Indoos live in your own la la land so such is expected. Run of the mill really.
I don't know if he is a spy, he is allegedly a spy and on has a similar allegation of fomenting terror activities in Pakistan. I haven't heard any clarification from Indian government on what his role really is in this entire saga, which is further complicated with Pakistan's military court and lack of any access to Indian consular service.

Now if he is a spy as Pakistan alleges, I am sure he is not Thanos that single-handedly has built the entire Baloch separatist empire. If he has aided terrorist at least provide the evidence, so he can defend himself in a court of law. Then comes into contention the track record of Military court whose judgment was overturned by an international court in a single hearing, so what must have been the rest of jurisprudence becomes a contentious issue.

Now in a respectable court of law if he is proven guilty, then it is a condemnable act because there is no mandate or popularity among the people of India in fomenting any negative activity in Balochistan. The strategic importance of such activity in Balochistan is minimal for India, and overall its direct involvement in terror activity in India which is a reprhensible act by a democratically elected government.

I can dig out a clip of Musharraf from somewhere where he clearly recalls there is tremendous sympathy for holy warriors fighting in Kashmir, where people will donate in donation boxes outside of the religious establishment and youngsters will voluntarily join the holy war. There exists no such sentiment for Balochistan in India, where any Indian is interested in anything that happens there. Most Indians won't be able to point out Balochistan on a map and there is no interest in any activity there.
 
Last edited:
.
I don't know if he is a spy, he is allegedly a spy and on has a similar allegation of fomenting terror activities in Pakistan. I haven't heard any clarification from Indian government on what his role really is in this entire saga, which is further complicated with Pakistan's military court and lack of any access to Indian consular service.

Now if he is a spy as Pakistan alleges, I am sure he is not Thanos that single-handedly has built the entire Baloch separatist empire. If he has aided terrorist at least provide the evidence, so he can defend himself in a court of law. Then comes into contention the track record of Military court whose judgment was overturned by an international court in a single hearing, so what must have been the rest of jurisprudence becomes a contentious issue.

Now in a respectable court of law if he is proven guilty, then it is a condemnable act because there is no mandate or popularity among the people of India in fomenting any negative activity in Balochistan. I can dig out a clip of Musharraf from somewhere where he clearly recalls there is tremendous sympathy for holy warriors fighting in Kashmir, where people will donate in donation boxes outside of the religious establishment and youngsters will voluntarily join the holy war. There exists no such sentiment for Balochistan in India, where any Indian is interested in anything that happens there. Most Indians won't be able to point out Balochistan on a map and there is no interest in any activity there.

Nice attempt at portraying Indian public being disinterested in Balochistan.

Who amongst us is talking about Indian public anyways? Indian public does not equal your fascist Brahmin ruling elite.
 
.
Forget peace, and friendship and all of it at this point. There is no trade between the two countries, and the economies are not dependent on each other. For the next 5 years just disengage completely from each other and lower hostilities with one simple understanding, no meddling in each other affairs. That itself is the biggest foundation for meaningful peace talks that can only come from lowering hostilities.
To me, it's very much like tuning PID loops, get the large oscillatory behavior in control and then fine tune gain values and transfer functions for stable data.
Fair point, it's like time out. I think peace is possible, if we look at history nations have reached a mutual understanding. You never know, the coming generations(includes me:D) may solve Pak India problems.
 
.
Nice attempt at portraying Indian public being disinterested in Balochistan.

Who amongst us is talking about Indian public anyways? Indian public does not equal your fascist Brahmin ruling elite.

Fascist Brahmin ruling elite. Very interesting adjectives.
For the fascist part, Indian constitution hasn't changed since 1950 in it's fundamental makeup; few amendments here and there, of which for the last two decades all have been for economic activities, removal of red tape, minority reservation and all went through the same constitutional process of parliament houses as bills. Indian judiciary, parliament, bureaucracy, all remain intact. That's all I will comment on fascism.

Now about the brahmin part of your comment:
Prime Minister of India : Is from caste classified as Other Backward Class (OBC)
President of India: is from a Dalit caste (Kori, SC)
Defence Minister of India: Rajnath Singh : From a Kshatria Caste (non-brahmin)
Home Minister: Amit Shah : From a baniya Caste (non-brahmin)

Now for the Elite part of it, none of the current elites came from an elite background; Modi background is well known, Amit Shah comes from a family that was in PVC Pipe business, President of India had humble beginnings and Defence minister comes from a farming family.
 
.
Thick face goes a long way!

Poor crazy is so out of hope he even went and cried at China! :rofl:
Hopeless is the word.

It is actually bemusing that the mediocre Indian intellect on display here has further cemented your point by trying to infer an obnoxious concoction of bilateral bla bla rather than the obvious i.e. Pakistan bashing rants are corner stone of Indian foreign policy, that a mediocre leader can't help it is more to do with his mindset...

That doing it in front of Chinese President amounts to exposing his own cloudy intellect further, is beyond the mediocre mentality of Butcher of Gujrat and those who try to read some deaper purpose behind the cloudy, extremist mindset and the associated rona dhona that is part and parcel of such.
If Discussing all aspects of enriching our bilateral relations
 
.
Modi can do his randi rona wherever he likes, in reality nobody cares. Proxy wars are an established part of modern conflicts. The Chinese sent proxies to Vietnam, the Americans and Pakistanis supported Proxies in Afghanistan, heck during the 90's the ISI was supporting proxies as far as Bosnia and Chechnya. The Arabs and Persians have destroyed Iraq, Syria and Yemen using proxies. They previously destroyed Lebanon. The USA even today funds proxy wars around the world and the the Russians do too, particularly in Crimea for example. India does not have clean hands, they support movements in Afghanistan and Pakistan, they've supported the Tamil tigers for years, we support the Kashmiris and ought to be sponsoring jihadi proxies in the indian mainland.

India can cry victim and Pakistan can bleat about peace - its all for show. Until the bullets and the money runs out, there won't be peace.
 
.
Now for the Elite part of it, none of the current elites came from an elite background; Modi background is well known, Amit Shah comes from a family that was in PVC Pipe business, President of India had humble beginnings and Defence minister comes from a farming family.
SO 4 people run the parliament?
 
. .
SO 4 people run the parliament?
No but it represents the most elite of power structure. Despite the misgivings of multiple narratives, India hasn't turned fascist, theocratic, dictatorial it remain the same constitutional democracy.
 
.
No but it represents the most elite of power structure. Despite the misgivings of multiple narratives, India hasn't turned fascist, theocratic, dictatorial it remain the same constitutional democracy.
by giving 4 examples out of.... ?? Is it statistically significant?
 
.
by giving 4 examples out of.... ?? Is it statistically significant?
I don't know the caste of all the 543 Loksabha Seats, you are free to look them up.

Also when you run out of argument don't accuse me derailing the topic at hand, My responses poignant to the queries posted here.
 
.
Fascist Brahmin ruling elite. Very interesting adjectives.
For the fascist part, Indian constitution hasn't changed since 1950 in it's fundamental makeup; few amendments here and there, of which for the last two decades all have been for economic activities, removal of red tape, minority reservation and all went through the same constitutional process of parliament houses as bills. Indian judiciary, parliament, bureaucracy, all remain intact. That's all I will comment on fascism.

Now about the brahmin part of your comment:
Prime Minister of India : Is from caste classified as Other Backward Class (OBC)
President of India: is from a Dalit caste (Kori, SC)
Defence Minister of India: Rajnath Singh : From a Kshatria Caste (non-brahmin)
Home Minister: Amit Shah : From a baniya Caste (non-brahmin)

Now for the Elite part of it, none of the current elites came from an elite background; Modi background is well known, Amit Shah comes from a family that was in PVC Pipe business, President of India had humble beginnings and Defence minister comes from a farming family.

Front men. Country that has an entrenched cast system, Brahmins rule in every way.
 
.
I don't know the caste of all the 543 Loksabha Seats, you are free to look them up.
Why should I? You seemed satisfied with 4 out 543 as a case to counter some member here?


Also when you run out of argument don't accuse me derailing the topic at hand, My responses poignant to the queries posted here.
Well we are far past that arent we? I mean you have effectively derailed it from bouncing back and forth abt Pakistan and india
 
.
Front men. Country that has an entrenched cast system, Brahmins rule in every way.
Yes there is an enormous problem of caste system still prevailing today. But that does not make the government of India, being run by brahmins, neither is India fascist in any way. Caste based discrimination in India does not play into formenting trouble in balochistan, just saying.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom