Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[VCheng]

deceased grandfather/father

Alleged grandfather/father.

 

[The Sandman]

Baboon media cell trolls are back
Ganjey ki tind pey chitar parney kay asaar nazar aye to chikhain inki nikal gayein
@The Sandman @Hell hound

Ganje ki full phati hui hai islye bitya rani ne media cell ko danda de dya hai ab

 

[Emmie]

BVI is part of UK that why its called British...

And i have no idea what they will produce.. it is reasonably likely it will be forged and even more likely that pti wont have a clue what to do with it...

BVI has its own legislation, laws like BCA don't extend to mainland. As for forgery, well, trust me everyday is not Sunday.

 

[mr.robot]

BVI has its own legislation, laws like BCA don't extend to mainland. As for forgery, well, trust me everyday is not Sunday.

Sir! Have you looked at documents regarding Maryam's land purchase? Stamp papers were bought in March while sale deed was signed in February. SC grilled Makhdoom on that as well. Another forgery after Gulf Steel Mill's documents.

 

[Rank]

Pehlay khali raath ko Comedy program lagtay thay ub tu Subha subha bhi Kabarnak hota hey Maryam Aurangzeb, Talat Choudry aur Danial Aziz ke shakal may aur ub tu dono khwajay b agaye hain

hahahahhahah

 

[Verve]

So far Sharifs haven't submitted any record of transaction shown in their tax returns.

Defense counsel today contended that matters related to income tax were beyond the jurisdiction of the court, also contented that it was his client's right to conceal his bank statements. However the court today directed the counsel to produce records of transactions, a judge even said "we are not speaking in Persian, just present bank statements". I am sure no record will be presented, not sure of the consequences if they should fail to comply.

If Hassan Nawaz transferred the money from his personal account (held outside UK) then UK's HMRC would be very interested in finding out if he paid any income taxes in UK were paid against these earnings! Maybe I should give HMRC a ring! They like catching big fat fish.

If the funds transfer was done directly from the company bank accounts, then this GIFT claim by NS will be proven a lie. Transfer of funds from a company to a private person can't be declared as a gift by a son even if the son is the sole shareholder of that company.

Let's see what statements are presented in SC. I suspect that the so called gift to NS was made from a company's bank account and not from Hassan's personal account. But Shariffs are experts are messing things up for themselves so later may be true instead.

 

[Emmie]

Sir! Have you looked at documents regarding Maryam's land purchase? Stamp papers were bought in March while sale deed was signed in February. SC grilled Makhdoom on that as well. Another forgery after Gulf Steel Mill's documents.

Yes, it's called time travel my dear friend. Nothing seems to be working for Sharifs. As they say "jiddon waila changa howay tay puthiyan vee sidhyan pandiyan nay tay jiddon waila bura howay tay sidiyan ve puthiyan pandiyan nay" In NS case sidyan ve puthiyan tay puthiyan ve puthiyan.

 

[Rank]

Nobody can transfer 52 Crore of amount under so called "Gift" label to anyone especially from international account.

 

[Emmie]

If Hassan Nawaz transferred the money from his personal account (held outside UK) then UK's HMRC would be very interested in finding out if he paid any income taxes in UK were paid against these earnings! Maybe I should give HMRC a ring! They like catching big fat fish.

If the funds transfer was done directly from the company bank accounts, then this GIFT claim by NS will be proven a lie. Transfer of funds from a company to a private person can't be declared as a gift by a son even if the son is the sole shareholder of that company.

Let's see what statements are presented in SC. I suspect that the so called gift to NS was made from a company's bank account and not from Hassan's personal account. But Shariffs are experts are messing things up for themselves so later may be true instead.

As per defense counsel money was remitted from KSA. We'll find out the source in a day or two, couldn't agree more with you, Shariffs are experts at messing up things for themselves.

 

[mr42O]

If Hassan Nawaz transferred the money from his personal account (held outside UK) then UK's HMRC would be very interested in finding out if he paid any income taxes in UK were paid against these earnings! Maybe I should give HMRC a ring! They like catching big fat fish.

If the funds transfer was done directly from the company bank accounts, then this GIFT claim by NS will be proven a lie. Transfer of funds from a company to a private person can't be declared as a gift by a son even if the son is the sole shareholder of that company.

Let's see what statements are presented in SC. I suspect that the so called gift to NS was made from a company's bank account and not from Hassan's personal account. But Shariffs are experts are messing things up for themselves so later may be true instead.

Not maybe U SHOULD call HMRC

 

[Verve]

Not maybe U SHOULD call HMRC

Waiting for what his lawyer will have to say about it. Surely someone has to raise the question in court whether he sent the money from his personal account or from somewhere else ...

 

[biloo700]

جسٹس آصف سعید کھوسہ نے کہا کہ تحفے میں کوئی گھڑی نہیں دی گئی مسلسل رقم دی گئی، ہوسکتا ہے امیروں کے تحفے ایسے ہی ہوتے ہوں۔

مخدوم علی خان کا کہنا تھا کہ وزیراعظم اپنے بچوں کے کاروبار سے آگاہ ہیں، بیٹوں کا کاروبار ہے جس سے رقم آ رہی ہے، جس پر جسٹس عظمیت سعید شیخ نے استفسار کیا کہ کیا کبھی والد نے اپنے بیٹوں سے پوچھا کہ اتنا پیسہ کہاں سے اور کس کاروبار سے آ رہا ہے اور اس رقم کو تحفے میں دینے کی کیا وجوہات ہیں؟

خدوم علی خان نے کہا کہ 2012ء میں یہ جائیداد مریم نواز کے اثاثہ جات میں شامل کردی گئی، 13-2012 کے گوشواروں میں مریم نواز کا نام زیرِ کفالت کے خانے میں نہیں تھا۔ جسٹس آصف سعید کھوسہ نے کہا ہوسکتا ہے کہ یہ کالا دھن ہو

بیٹے نے والد کو رقم بھیجی، باپ نے بیٹی کے نام زمین خریدلی، ہوسکتا ہے رقم غیر قانونی طریقے سے بیٹے کو منتقل کی گئی ہو، ممکن ہے مریم نے والد کی جانب سے دی گئی رقم سے ہی جائیداد خریدی ہو۔

جسٹس آصف نے کہا کہ کیا آپ کہنا چاہ رہے ہیں کہ بیٹی کے نام کی جائیداد کالم میں ظاہر کرنا نیک نیتی ہے؟ ہوسکتا ہے اس طرح ایک طرف جائیداد خریدی جارہی ہو اور احتیاط بھی برتی جارہی ہو۔

جسٹس اعجاز الالحسن نے وزیراعظم کے وکیل سے استفسار کیا کہ حسین نواز نے صرف والد کو ہی کیوں تحائف دیئے؟


کل وزیراعظم کی 3 تقاریر کے تمام پہلوؤں سے جائزہ لیں گے۔ ایشو بڑا ہے ممکن ہے کچھ وقت لگ جائے، نواز شریف کی تقاریر اور عدالت میں موقف میں تضاد پر کل
وضاحت دیں۔
​

@biloo700 ki baat par yaqeen karnay ko dil chah raha hai lekin hamaray haan institutions ka koi bharosa nahi...

Bhai ap Zara Language check karo Government k ministers ki .. Below the belt attack ho raha tha aj ... fake documents

submit kara rahe hain court me ... yeh sirf Disqualify nae hu ge .. Jail bhee jaenge ... court me fake document submit

karane k chakar me ... Government ko andaza hu gya hai SC k mood ka ... me tu bus PTI k Lawyer ki bari ka wait kr raha hun ..

 

[Dil Pakistan]

Just read the last two lines of IK's statement

 

[Mrc]

Source express news print editiin

 

[Dil Pakistan]

View attachment 369526
Source express news print editiin

What is the source of this news item ?

BBC is not like GEO.....they have very strict editor's rules and an item like this cannot be aired without editor's approval.

If there is to be an investigation, it will be against the editor and not the reporter.