Village life
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2016
- Messages
- 1,713
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
Himat nai Hari sirf Jo sach hy wo daikh k roraha hu,apni tu aisy ya waisy Kat Jaiy gi,Nai nasal ny kaya gunah Kia hy Pakistan main paida ho k ?
Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion
- Thread starter war&peace
- Start date
- Status
Farah Sohail
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2012
- Messages
- 7,228
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
PakSword
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2015
- Messages
- 19,505
- Reaction score
- 103
- Country
- Location
Farah Sohail
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2012
- Messages
- 7,228
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
By tht time, 2018 elections will come... If commission is time specified, as the court says...it will be extremely difficult to get those documents attested, by foreign countries, and those countries can say, tht we dont have this much old record, of 40 yrs ago...
PakSword
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2015
- Messages
- 19,505
- Reaction score
- 103
- Country
- Location
Aik aur besharmi.. Abb aap is video ko dekh kar andaza lagaein ke PIA kay chairman nay aik engine wali baat kyun ki..
@Farah Sohail @paindobaba
Not just attestation, full investigation is required...
@Farah Sohail @paindobaba
Not just attestation, full investigation is required...
Verve
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 15, 2014
- Messages
- 11,116
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
You are getting into nitty gritty of the stuff. Look at the bigger picture. NS and his family plus his party are getting ridiculed every day and this is good. Zardari's PPP met the same fate. Decades of filth does not get wiped clean in just two months. There are many battles ahead in this war against the corrupt, which you and many others sitting on the sides many years ago have joined in as well.
Village life
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2016
- Messages
- 1,713
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
Bus Rabba terian tu He Jaanain,ty Merrian v Tu ee jaanain,merrian khatawwan vich shumar, Terian rehmataan beshumar,, O God forgive us we are sinners, thats why we are having such people's to govern us , Allah hum sy naraz hain pori qoum ko istagfar krni hogi ,Astagfirullah ,Astagfirullah ,Astagfirullah, Allah muaf Krdy ,
Farah Sohail
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2012
- Messages
- 7,228
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Yes.. Owner of dawn is wife of Azam Sehgal..... Ye dawn leaks k culprits hum sab ki jaan le kar chorein ge (including ganja sharif) lekin inko kuch nahi hoga
Pakistani public have short memories... Dont be surprised if in next elections, baby zardari manages to get many seats for PPP in next elections....
arhamshoukat
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2016
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
hopefully soon enough this panama case will be settled
mr.robot
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2014
- Messages
- 976
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
In this country, people linked to supposedly one of the best army and and spy agency with so much man power and fire power couldn't do anything about national security breach. You are expecting too much from a political party. Also, read the remarks of judges at the end, they are leaning towards commision.
Farah Sohail
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2012
- Messages
- 7,228
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
PML N unlikley to back inquiry commission
ISLAMABAD: Feeling the heat of the Supreme Court’s proceedings in Panamagate case, the ruling party on Wednesday held marathon meetings to review options against the formation of an inquiry commission to probe the mega scandal.
In these crucial and classified huddles, held at the PM House under the chair of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, the PM’s counsel in Panamagate case Salman Aslam Butt, Attorney General Ashtar Ausaf, the PM children’s counsel Akram Sheikh, Anusha Rehman and Raza Zafarul Haq took part.
According to sources, the lawyers for the PM and his family members argued against the commission’s formation and in support of maintaining status quo in the case. The ruling party is not likely to reach a consensus with the PTI on the commission’s formation fearing “too many repercussions,” reliable sources in the ruling PML-N shared withThe Express Tribune.
“The formation of commission means all the respondents would have to appear before the inquiry panel. And any such appearance implies grilling, cross-examination and all that. This would be nothing less than a nightmare for us,” a senior PML-N leader said, while requesting not to be named.
The ruling party, he said, would push for the exclusion of the PM’s name in case the court decided to set up a commission even if consensus between both the sides was not reached.
“Imagine if the PM had to appear before the commission and to face tough questions, harsh arguments and serious allegations. It would be a very grim scenario – something we would never want to happen,” he added.
Interestingly, in November, when the apex court started hearing the case, the ruling party was claiming that it did not have any objection in case an inquiry commission was formed.
“We never expected the things to unfold the way they have. The court’s toughened stance, strong remarks and severe reprimands to both the parties show that stakes are too high,” a source said. “Law sees everything in black and white and in case the inquiry panel presses to dig deeper into the money trail in the Panamagate case, things would get very challenging for us.
“The apex court has so far not strongly pressed to track the money trail and this is somehow favouring us. We would want the regular proceedings to continue. Based on available evidence, we are confident that there isn’t much against us,” he added.
Another PML-N leader, who enjoys close association with the PM and Sharif family, said the party leadership’s concerns regarding the commission’s formation also have much to do with the ‘Qatari Prince factor’.
“Whether or not the Qatari prince would appear before the commission is a matter of speculation. However, an order to summon the Qatari prince before the inquiry panel would not only land us in uncomfortable position but it would also not go down well with the royals,” he said.
Senior PML-N leader Raja Zafarul Haq said the PM and his family members’ stance in Panamagate case was known to all, adding that they had requested in the court that the PM’s name should be excluded from the case because he was not named in Panama leaks.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 8th, 2016.
http://tribune.com.pk/story/1256978/pml-n-unlikely-back-inquiry-commission/
@PakSword @Doordie @El_Swordsmen @Emmie @epicname
PTI wants top court to decide panamagate case
ISLAMABAD: Imran Khan’s political aides strongly favoured adjudication of the Panamagate case by larger bench of the Supreme Court, but the party will finalise its decision on Thursday (today) after PTI’s legal team gave its input.
Imran Khan’s close political and legal aides gathered at Imran Khan’s Bani Gala residence to ponder upon available options – whether to prefer a fact-finding judicial commission for in-depth investigations or to continue with the larger bench currently hearing the case – suggested by the Supreme Court.
“Not only Imran Khan, but a significant majority of (PTI’s) top leadership is not in favour of setting up the commission to probe the matter,” a senior PTI leader, who wished not to be named, said.
Some questions, he said, would be answered by the legal team today [Thursday]
He said that Imran Khan believed that PTI had submitted sufficient evidence before the court and there was no need to go for an option that could be easily managed by the Sharifs through state departments which would surely be involved in the investigation process.
PTI’s Vice-Chairman Shah Mehmood Qureshi said that during preliminary meeting, the party carefully assessed Wednesday’s proceedings, observations of the judges and arguments of the counsel Salman Butt. “Today we [PTI] concluded that the Sharif family is virtually without any defence,” Qureshi said.
“Every aspect of the case is clear and in clear view of the larger bench. The case is almost decided … Now only some small explanations are needed and I question if they (the larger bench) cannot call those minute clarifications,” Qureshi said when asked what options PTI was considering. However, he reiterated that the decision would be finalised in light of the opinion of the party’s legal team.
Earlier, Imran Khan told media persons outside the Supreme Court’s premises that the nation wanted the court to decide the matter. “They [the Sharifs] have failed to substantiate their claims about the money trail. There is nothing left in this case now,” Khan observed.
He said the counsel for the Sharifs admitted before the court that Nawaz Sharif’s clarification in the National Assembly about his children’s offshore firms was just a ‘political speech’.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 8th, 2016.
tribune.com.pk/story/1256989/final-decision-today-pti-wants-top-court-decide-panamagate-case/
@PakSword @Doordie @El_Swordsmen @Emmie @epicname
ISLAMABAD: Feeling the heat of the Supreme Court’s proceedings in Panamagate case, the ruling party on Wednesday held marathon meetings to review options against the formation of an inquiry commission to probe the mega scandal.
In these crucial and classified huddles, held at the PM House under the chair of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, the PM’s counsel in Panamagate case Salman Aslam Butt, Attorney General Ashtar Ausaf, the PM children’s counsel Akram Sheikh, Anusha Rehman and Raza Zafarul Haq took part.
According to sources, the lawyers for the PM and his family members argued against the commission’s formation and in support of maintaining status quo in the case. The ruling party is not likely to reach a consensus with the PTI on the commission’s formation fearing “too many repercussions,” reliable sources in the ruling PML-N shared withThe Express Tribune.
“The formation of commission means all the respondents would have to appear before the inquiry panel. And any such appearance implies grilling, cross-examination and all that. This would be nothing less than a nightmare for us,” a senior PML-N leader said, while requesting not to be named.
The ruling party, he said, would push for the exclusion of the PM’s name in case the court decided to set up a commission even if consensus between both the sides was not reached.
“Imagine if the PM had to appear before the commission and to face tough questions, harsh arguments and serious allegations. It would be a very grim scenario – something we would never want to happen,” he added.
Interestingly, in November, when the apex court started hearing the case, the ruling party was claiming that it did not have any objection in case an inquiry commission was formed.
“We never expected the things to unfold the way they have. The court’s toughened stance, strong remarks and severe reprimands to both the parties show that stakes are too high,” a source said. “Law sees everything in black and white and in case the inquiry panel presses to dig deeper into the money trail in the Panamagate case, things would get very challenging for us.
“The apex court has so far not strongly pressed to track the money trail and this is somehow favouring us. We would want the regular proceedings to continue. Based on available evidence, we are confident that there isn’t much against us,” he added.
Another PML-N leader, who enjoys close association with the PM and Sharif family, said the party leadership’s concerns regarding the commission’s formation also have much to do with the ‘Qatari Prince factor’.
“Whether or not the Qatari prince would appear before the commission is a matter of speculation. However, an order to summon the Qatari prince before the inquiry panel would not only land us in uncomfortable position but it would also not go down well with the royals,” he said.
Senior PML-N leader Raja Zafarul Haq said the PM and his family members’ stance in Panamagate case was known to all, adding that they had requested in the court that the PM’s name should be excluded from the case because he was not named in Panama leaks.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 8th, 2016.
http://tribune.com.pk/story/1256978/pml-n-unlikely-back-inquiry-commission/
@PakSword @Doordie @El_Swordsmen @Emmie @epicname
PTI wants top court to decide panamagate case
ISLAMABAD: Imran Khan’s political aides strongly favoured adjudication of the Panamagate case by larger bench of the Supreme Court, but the party will finalise its decision on Thursday (today) after PTI’s legal team gave its input.
Imran Khan’s close political and legal aides gathered at Imran Khan’s Bani Gala residence to ponder upon available options – whether to prefer a fact-finding judicial commission for in-depth investigations or to continue with the larger bench currently hearing the case – suggested by the Supreme Court.
“Not only Imran Khan, but a significant majority of (PTI’s) top leadership is not in favour of setting up the commission to probe the matter,” a senior PTI leader, who wished not to be named, said.
Some questions, he said, would be answered by the legal team today [Thursday]
He said that Imran Khan believed that PTI had submitted sufficient evidence before the court and there was no need to go for an option that could be easily managed by the Sharifs through state departments which would surely be involved in the investigation process.
PTI’s Vice-Chairman Shah Mehmood Qureshi said that during preliminary meeting, the party carefully assessed Wednesday’s proceedings, observations of the judges and arguments of the counsel Salman Butt. “Today we [PTI] concluded that the Sharif family is virtually without any defence,” Qureshi said.
“Every aspect of the case is clear and in clear view of the larger bench. The case is almost decided … Now only some small explanations are needed and I question if they (the larger bench) cannot call those minute clarifications,” Qureshi said when asked what options PTI was considering. However, he reiterated that the decision would be finalised in light of the opinion of the party’s legal team.
Earlier, Imran Khan told media persons outside the Supreme Court’s premises that the nation wanted the court to decide the matter. “They [the Sharifs] have failed to substantiate their claims about the money trail. There is nothing left in this case now,” Khan observed.
He said the counsel for the Sharifs admitted before the court that Nawaz Sharif’s clarification in the National Assembly about his children’s offshore firms was just a ‘political speech’.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 8th, 2016.
tribune.com.pk/story/1256989/final-decision-today-pti-wants-top-court-decide-panamagate-case/
@PakSword @Doordie @El_Swordsmen @Emmie @epicname
PakSword
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2015
- Messages
- 19,505
- Reaction score
- 103
- Country
- Location
There is not enough evidence or the quality of evidences is not sufficient to prove any party's standpoint. That's why PMLN wants to carry on with the current bench. There is also a possibility of NS not being charged on criminal grounds i.e. money laundering.
I told you yesterday that it's in the benefit of PTI to go for commission. Regardless, there is extremely slim chance that PTI wins this case. In a commission inquiry, PMLN will get exposed in each hearing. This really will hurt their vote bank even if they win in the end.
This is my own opinion.
I told you yesterday that it's in the benefit of PTI to go for commission. Regardless, there is extremely slim chance that PTI wins this case. In a commission inquiry, PMLN will get exposed in each hearing. This really will hurt their vote bank even if they win in the end.
This is my own opinion.
- Status
Latest posts
-
Imran Khan vs Pakistan: Protest of Treachery - Casualty Report
- Latest: Novus ordu seclorum
-
No Strings Attached: Discover Local Ladies in Your Town- Latest: rana.aamir2990
-
-
Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts
-
Imran Khan vs Pakistan: Protest of Treachery - Casualty Report
- Latest: Novus ordu seclorum
-
-
-
-
Bajwa calls Bushra's allegations against Saudi Arabia 'baseless'
- Latest: Novus ordu seclorum
