Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[PakSword]

No.. He is also darling of our PM..not only baji.... If PM is there, then Fawad hasan fawad is also powerful.... S fawad hasan fawad is attending meetings on national security... So dawn leaks tu............

Chalain mitti paen..

Main ne tou mitti dal kar sab kuchh dafan kardia...

 

[Farah Sohail]

Chalain mitti paen..

Main ne tou mitti dal kar sab kuchh dafan kardia...

Dafan tu main ne bhi kar diya....agar zara ratti bhar bhi koi khushfehmi thee..kisi hawalay se.. Tu Mian sb ki aankh k taaray ke aanay ke baad...sab khatam hogayein.... Ye bhi acha hua..

Ab maujein hi maujein..sisat dano ki..... Oh wait..did u hear....yesterday.. farooq Sattar called Mian sb ki aankh k taaray..and congratulated him on being COAS? And Zardari is here already......enjoying a comfortable visit .... Eenton ka pata nahi kia hua? Woh bhi dafan hogayi Raheel Sharif k jaatay hi...

 

[El_Swordsmen]

few lines from FIA report ....

Mr. Javed Kayani, a friend of Nawaz Sharif, on August 26, 1992, opened three fake accounts in the names of Sulman Zia, Muhammad Ramzan and Asghar Ali at Habib Bank AG Zurich branch in Lahore. The FIA found that these three individuals did not exist and fake identity cards were used to open the said accounts.

Bank records reveals that large sums of money were transferred from these accounts to Mr Sheikh Saeed Muhammad, a close friend of Nawaz Sharif, based in Washington DC. Javed Kayani, the individual behind the opening of fake accounts is said to be the nephew of Sheikh Saeed Muhammad.

Javed Kayani, additionally opened three more accounts at the Bank Of America, Lahore, in the name Kashif Masood Qazi, Sikander Masood Qazi and Nuzhat Masood Qazi.

Records show that a sum of $20,00,000 was transferred from the fake account of Sulman Zia to the account of Kashif Masood Qazi. This money was used as collateral by the Sharif family for sanctioning a loan for Hudabiya Engineering Ltd from the Bank of America. The directors of Hudaibiya Engineering Ltd at that time were Hussain Nawaz, Kulsoom Nawaz, Muhammad Nawaz Sharif and Shahbaz Sharif.

Nearly $350,000 from the fake account of Sulman Zia was then transferred in 1993 to Shamrock Consulting Corporation, a company registered in the British Virgin Islands.

The Sharif family is said to have utilized services of Mr. Urs Specker, the General Manager of Ansbacher Switzerland, a fiduciary company acting on behalf of the Sharif family, to purchase four luxury properties in London worth $5 Million.

According to the UK's land registry documents, it was established that Mr. Urs purchased four luxury flats for the Sharif family - 16, 16A, 17, 17A at Avenfield House, London. This transaction was arranged through a firm of solicitors namely Dibb Lupton Broomhead in 1993, 1995 and 1996.

When in London, Nawaz Sharif's son, Hussain Nawaz resides at suite number 17 Avenfield House and it is also his official address with his bank and college.

These flats are owned by two offshore companies called Nielson Enterprises Ltd and Nescoll Ltd, both of which are registered in the British Virgin Islands. These companies are controlled by Mr. Urs Specker.

 

[Dastaan]

You are winning... Don't worry.

 

[El_Swordsmen]

@Emmie Sir did SC accepted/considered FIA's report on shareef family's money laundering as submissible evidence ??
(as it's not an ordinary report, it explains entire detail how money was laundered with evidences)

 

[Mrc]

Now that its pretty much clear what the court decision would be....

May i point out flaw in ik siyasat....

Instead of waisting another year chasing panama ghost ... he should have made camp in peshawar... and overseen evry thing personally....

PTI would hve been in far better position...

He will not survive another political agitation politically.... and thats where he is headed now

 

[Emmie]

@Emmie Sir did SC accepted/considered FIA's report on shareef family's money laundering as submissible evidence ??
(as it's not an ordinary report, it explains entire detail how money was laundered with evidences)

It didn't spurn the report either so in a way the court has held the report admissible. Not an ordinary report, true, but please recall that the report was submitted before president in 1997, in other words report is two decade old.

 

[Dastaan]

Now that its pretty much clear what the court decision would be....

May i point out flaw in ik siyasat....

Instead of waisting another year chasing panama ghost ... he should have made camp in peshawar... and overseen evry thing personally....

PTI would hve been in far better position...

He will not survive another political agitation politically.... and thats where he is headed now

Don't worry he will survive

 

[Farah Sohail]

It didn't spurn the report either so in a way the court has held the report admissible. Not an ordinary report, true, but please recall that the report was submitted before president in 1997, in other words report is two decade old.

SC has dismissed the report saying tht its the opinion of rehman malik and we cant give judgements based on his opinion.....as expected..

But 1 thing... This report has all the money trail, util the purchase of those flats.... So even if Sc dismisses the money trail, as this repor was published in 97, atleast if not anything else..this report proves ownership of flats by sharif family, before 2006... Even if money trail is not accepted..has Naeem bukhari pointed this out...tht Sc was all along saying..tht prove ownership of flats by sharif family before 2006.. So if this report has mention of those flats and money trail, in 1997... So atleast ownership of flats is established before 2006..... Did Naeem bukhari emphasise on the ownership of these flats before 2006, based on this report?

Judges are literally dismissing everything / every proof tht could go against sharif family.. They are not ready to accept any evidence against sharif family at all... Openly biased they are.... Shameful conduct of judges

 

[Emmie]

Now that its pretty much clear what the court decision would be....

NS is gonna come out clean? No, a big no. If CPs are dismissed the ground will be technical, not innocence.

 

[Farah Sohail]

@Emmie Sir did SC accepted/considered FIA's report on shareef family's money laundering as submissible evidence ??
(as it's not an ordinary report, it explains entire detail how money was laundered with evidences)

Judges said....how can we give judgement..based on opinion of Rehman Malik? Its an opinion of rehman malik..and nothing has been proved in any court over this...iski qanooni haisyat nahi hai... One judge remarked..Rehman Malik ka tu apna naam bhi shayad panama papers main hai

NS is gonna come out clean? No, a big no. If CPs are dismissed the ground will be technical, not innocence.

Implications will be same..even if decision comes in favor of nawaz sharif, based on technical grounds.. So it doesnt matter.. Infact it will be even mor shameful..

 

[Emmie]

SC has dismissed the report saying tht its the opinion of rehman malik and we cant give judgements based on his opinion.....as expected..

Opinion? It was a report compiled after thorough investigation, investigator was FIA, a state institution vested with the constitutional responsibility to probe into such matters. No lady, judges didn't reject the reoprt, all they said was inclusion of report would broaden the spectrum which they thought wasn't necessary.

mplications will be same..even if decision comes in favor of nawaz sharif, based on technical grounds.. So it doesnt matter.. Infact it will be even mor shameful..

Exactly my point.

 

[Farah Sohail]

Opinion? It was a report compiled after thorough investigation, investigator was FIA, a state institution vested with the constitutional responsibility to probe into such matters. No lady, judges didn't reject the reoprt, all they said was inclusion of report would broaden the spectrum which they thought wasn't necessary.

I read somewhere yesterday ..remarks of judges.. They said...tht why didnt anyone act on them? One judge remarked..tht its an opinion of RMalik.. Hum uski opinion par judgements kaisy dein? Nothing is proved in court... Rehman malik ne is par baad main act kiun nahi kiya? Blah blah blah... Rehman malik ka tu apna naam bhi shayad panama main hai

@Emmie read judges remarks reg Rehman Malik report in this link

http://e.dunya.com.pk/detail.php?date=2017-01-11&edition=LHR&id=2850407_43656020

 

[Emmie]

I read somewhere yesterday ..remarks of judges.. They said...tht why didnt anyone act on them? One judge remarked..tht its an opinion of RMalik.. Hum uski opinion par judgements kaisy dein? Nothing is proved in court... Rehman malik ne is par baad main act kiun nahi kiya? Blah blah blah... Rehman malik ka tu apna naam bhi shayad panama main hai

Remark of a judge doesn't necessarily annul legality of a document. The question that why nobody took action should be asked to government of Pakistan; means PPP, Musharaf and Sharifs. PPP remained mum because of its own corruption, Musharaf remained mum because he made a deal with Sharifs & why would someone on the God's green earth initiate legal proceedings against himself/herself?

I read somewhere yesterday ..remarks of judges.. They said...tht why didnt anyone act on them? One judge remarked..tht its an opinion of RMalik.. Hum uski opinion par judgements kaisy dein? Nothing is proved in court... Rehman malik ne is par baad main act kiun nahi kiya? Blah blah blah... Rehman malik ka tu apna naam bhi shayad panama main hai

@Emmie read judges remarks reg Rehman Malik report in this link

http://e.dunya.com.pk/detail.php?date=2017-01-11&edition=LHR&id=2850407_43656020

I have read these remarks, I was insane enough to follow that day's proceeding. Let me repeat, it was not an opinion, it was a report compiled by FIA, altho no reference ever filed based on the report.

 

[Farah Sohail]

Remark of a judge doesn't necessarily annul legality of a document. The question that why nobody took action should be asked to government of Pakistan; means PPP, Musharaf and Sharifs. PPP remained mum because of its own corruption, Musharaf remained mum because he made a deal with Sharifs & why would someone on the God's green earth initiate legal proceedings against himself/herself?

I have read these remarks, I was insane enough to follow that day's proceeding. Let me repeat, it was not an opinion, it was a report compiled by FIA, altho no reference ever filed based on the report.

I am not saying its an opinion.. The problem is..judges think tht its an opinion of Rehman Malik and no judgement can be given on this basis.. More than 1 judge said, including Justice Khosa...tht this report is an opinion of Rehman Malik with no legal value