What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's true!

Let's see, it will be more clear when names of JIT comes out as it's guaranteed that SECP, SBP, FIA and NAB will do whatever in their power and beyond to save N$ - now its three member bench vs State of Pakistan.

@PakSword says tht FIA official which is most likely to be included is still a better person... But SECP, SBP. Ke members..Ishaq Dar ke favorites ne nominate kiye hain... Woh tu bilkol chamchay honge ... Aur NAB ne jo refer kiye hain..unke baaray main suna hai ke unn par khud investigations hochuki hian, past main..

Aur phir advocate aur pakora judge..

Mujhe bas Justice Ijazul Ahsan se umeed hai.. Allah karay ke woh convince hojayein..
 
Last edited:
. .
C-2GxaLXgAQGBdL.jpg:large
 
.
@PakSword says tht FIA official which is most likely to be included is still a better person... But SECP, SBP. Ke members..Ishaq Dar ke favorites ne nominate kiye hain... Woh tu bilkol chamchay honge ... Aur NAB ne jo refer kiye hain..unke baaray main suna hai ke unn par khud investigations hochuki hian, past main..

Aur phir advocate aur pakora judge..

Mujhe bas Justice Ijazul Ahsan se umeed hai.. Allah karay ke woh convince hojayein..


It is rather easy to predict what will come out of this investigation. To predict, we have to understand the perspective of these judges regarding evidence gathering.

Due to the legal restrictions in Panama, it is rather extremely difficult, if not impossible, to get the documents authenticated. This means they will not tell our JIT investigators who was the legal owner of offshore companies in 1993. They will not tell us who paid for these companies and through which channels. They will not tell us when were the flats purchased and who was the beneficial owner of the offshore companies when the flats were purchased.

Now the protective of judges as I have understood till now.

Advocate says that it is unconstitutional to ask a defendant to bring an evidence against himself. So there is no chance of asking anyone.. to write a letter to the authorities giving them permission to grant unrestricted access to the record related to these companies.

Pakora agrees with him.

Justice is in limbo..

Similar rule will apply on every question. If in the end, JIT doesn't bring anything, two judges will for sure dismiss the petition citing lack of concrete proofs against shareef family.

Justice may decide in their favor or otherwise. So it all comes down to him.

Mujhay lagta hai ke mujhay Justice ko chithi likh deni chahiey..
 
.
It is rather easy to predict what will come out of this investigation. To predict, we have to understand the perspective of these judges regarding evidence gathering.

Due to the legal restrictions in Panama, it is rather extremely difficult, if not impossible, to get the documents authenticated. This means they will not tell our JIT investigators who was the legal owner of offshore companies in 1993. They will not tell us who paid for these companies and through which channels. They will not tell us when were the flats purchased and who was the beneficial owner of the offshore companies when the flats were purchased.

Now the protective of judges as I have understood till now.

Advocate says that it is unconstitutional to ask a defendant to bring an evidence against himself. So there is no chance of asking anyone.. to write a letter to the authorities giving them permission to grant unrestricted access to the record related to these companies.

Pakora agrees with him.

Justice is in limbo..

Similar rule will apply on every question. If in the end, JIT doesn't bring anything, two judges will for sure dismiss the petition citing lack of concrete proofs against shareef family.

Justice may decide in their favor or otherwise. So it all comes down to him.

Mujhay lagta hai ke mujhay Justice ko chithi likh deni chahiey..

Waisy logically JIT ka kaam sirf NS family ko ek aur mauqa dena hai...apna reply denay ka.. Agar woh koi aur justification nahi de sakay JIT ko..t mera khyal hai ke disqualify hona chahye.. JIT ka kaam nahi hai ke abroad jaye aur dunya bhar se evidence laaye.. Balke sirf jo FOA aur NAB. Ke pass jo pehlay se evidences hain..Shareef family se poochna chahye ke inko ghalat sabit karnay ke liye aap ke pass kuch hai? Rehman amlik report aur hudaibya ke evidence ko ghalat sabit karna....shareefs ka kaam hai..

Lekin pakora judge aur advocate se aisi koi umeed nahi hai.. Justice Ijazul Ahsan se phir bhi umeed hai
 
.
Waisy logically JIT ka kaam sirf NS family ko ek aur mauqa dena hai...apna reply denay ka.. Agar woh koi aur justification nahi de sakay JIT ko..t mera khyal hai ke disqualify hona chahye.. JIT ka kaam nahi hai ke abroad jaye aur dunya bhar se evidence laaye.. Balke sirf jo FOA aur NAB. Ke pass jo pehlay se evidences hain..Shareef family se poochna chahye ke inko ghalat sabit karnay ke liye aap ke pass kuch hai? Rehman amlik report aur hudaibya ke evidence ko ghalat sabit karna....shareefs ka kaam hai..

Lekin pakora judge aur advocate se aisi koi umeed nahi hai.. Justice Ijazul Ahsan se phir bhi umeed hai

The TORs are clear. It's an investigation team.
 
.
The TORs are clear. It's an investigation team.

Lekin..i think FIA aur NAB. Ke evidences bhi use karsaktay hain, i think.. Main ne in majority judges ke TORs nahi parhay.. Lekin dissenting note main tu yeh cheez mention thee ke FIA report aur hudaibya ke evidence use karein
 
. .
Lekin..i think FIA aur NAB. Ke evidences bhi use karsaktay hain, i think.. Main ne in majorit judges ke TORs nahi parhay.. Lekin dissenting note main tu yeh cheez me tion thee ke FIA report aur hudaibya ke evidence use karein

I don't think they have referred to hudaibiya case in the operative part.

Anyway this is what I think. Baqi Allah Malik.
 
.
I don't think they have referred to hudaibiya case in the operative part.

Anyway this is what I think. Baqi Allah Malik.

Mujhe tu lagta hai ke majority judges ne hudaibya aur Rehman Malik ki report ka shayad zikr kiya hi nahi hai bilkol.. I think ..as far as i remember...advocate ne tu apni verdict main in dono cheezon ka siray se zikr hi nahi kiya hai..

Baqi do judges ka nahi pata..

Justice Khosa ki evedict main in dono ka detail se zikr tha
 
.
Mujhe tu lagta hai ke majority judges ne hudaibya aur Rehman Malik ki report ka shayad zikr kiya hi nahi hai bilkol.. I think ..as far as i remember...advocate ne tu apni verdict main in dono cheezon ka siray se zikr hi nahi kiya hai..

Baqi do judges ka nahi pata..

Justice Khosa ki evedict main in dono ka detail se zikr tha

All that matters now is the operative part.. which is the creation of JIT and its TORs. So my assessment could very well be true.
 
.
All that matters now is the operative part.. which is the creation of JIT and its TORs. So my assessment could very well be true.

Woh operative part dobara parhna paray ga....hosakta hai ke shayad kahin zikr ho..FIA report ka
 
.
Kal JIT ban jaye gi + TORs? Ya is main bhi 20 25 din lagayen gay yea
 
.
Woh operative part dobara parhna paray ga....hosakta hai ke shayad kahin zikr ho..FIA report ka

Parhain.. agar hosakay tou.. aur mujhay bhi bataein..

Advocate ke verdict main chhupa hai woh part

Kal JIT ban jaye gi + TORs? Ya is main bhi 20 25 din lagayen gay yea


TORs wohi questions hain jo kuch din pehlay main ne share kiey thay. Some thirteen questions need answers
 
.
Parhain.. agar hosakay tou.. aur mujhay bhi bataein..

Advocate ke verdict main chhupa hai woh part

JIT may also examine the evidence and material available with FIA and NAB, if any, relating to, or having any nexus with the possession or acquisition of the Mayfair properties and the source(s) of funding for the same

Oh acha ye ghalti se ye main ne Justice Ijazul Ahsan ki verdict main se quote kar diya tha.. Lekin jab main ne end main court order dekha tu thankGod us main bhi ye point mention tha
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom