It is the same dear, the guns were brought back for some analysis and a few new options have joined now so these have been sent back for testing. The initial claims that these are being tested in battlefield were never true
@Zarvan , I confirmed you at that time as well. These always were in too limited numbers to make it to operations and were always being evaluated at ranges. That is what will continue for now. FN SCAR performance is surely best but there are other guns in close competition and there will be factors other then these tests as well when making the final decision.
Had a detailed discussion just yesterday and you people need to sit tight for a few more weeks.
Also the plan is not to directly go for replacement of the whole army as i mentioned and now have been confirmed. The news that confused almost everyone was that that idea of this new guns is that it can replace the guns of whole army, AT SOME POINT in time! If that was not the case we would have just bought a few thousand guns directly however all this effort being put is is because the authorities want to select a gun that MAY be able to replace the guns in whole of army at some time, that will take years, years as in decades!!
For now the procurement will be for some selected units and then a decision will be made only afterwards, no matter how news channels chose to twist the words to say otherwise. Numbers we will be looking at are 10000 to 12000. It is likely that since the gun will be selected only once it is deemed suitable to be used with whole army one day and because G3 are getting old and need to be replaced this new guns do gets inducted with whole army in some years. However there still are some people in key positions that are in strong support of a locally made gun. We may see a product resulting from experiences of G3 and the new selected gun and this current trails only select gun that remain with some special units. However, this is far too early to pass on any judgements on that issue.