cabatli_53
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2008
- Messages
- 12,808
- Reaction score
- 62
- Country
- Location
I class detail design image
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just curious, why no VLS for AShM?I class detail design image
Is Pakistan getting this version??I class detail design image
No. They're getting the MILGEM Ada with VLS.Is Pakistan getting this version??
Likely the depth of the tubes is too much. Additionally, VL of AShM will decrease the range of the missile, which is unnecessary when u don't need 360 degree coverage.Just curious, why no VLS for AShM?
......According to a Chinese member on the board...
Just curious, why no VLS for AShM?
All of SAMs, AShMs, SGMs, ASROCs, and so on can be put into the same VLS.Makes no advantage over traditional launching pads. I know US has its new anti-ship missile VLS compatible but they are not likely to fit them into tubes either. Even for certain scenarios, it might come with disadvantages. Either you give up from missile's range or from deck space in the hull. Turkish Naval Forces has an ongoing VLS program under development but they only want it for surface-to-air missiles and cruise missiles.
All of SAMs, AShMs, SGMs, ASROCs, and so on can be put into the same VLS.
The point is that all your concerns are meaningless.And the point is..?
The point is that all your concerns are meaningless.