What's new

Pakistan Should Produce More Nuclear Weapons If No F16's

Hi,

Let the U S stop the sale----. Pakistan must increase the production of nuclear weapons by at least a 1000%.

So if the U S wants to cut off the conventional power base---no problem---let us increase the nuclear threshold---o_O.

The U S senators think that they got us by the ball joints---that is fine---let us increase the threshold---let us take the number of nuclear weapons to 500 at least---and let us start serious production of ICBM's---and other missile systems---:o:.

If the U S wants to play the game---that is fine----two can play it better---. Let us see who blinks first.


AOA,

Dear mastan bahi,

"yahan app thora zeyada ghusa kar gay .....:-)"
 
Simply answer is J-10 is just not as good as F-16. And PAF loves them, some F-16s

On Paper J-10 B maybe just as good and in certain aspects like AESA radar even better than F-16 Blk 52s.

But western weapons certain refinement about them, that Chinese or even Russians can not match. And only a operator who has operated both types of weapons can tell.

PAF as of now needs, night time, precision targeting capabilities for bombing its tribal areas. Thats is why it had ordered 6 dual seater and only 2 single seater F-16s.

After operating F-16 for more than three decades, PAF is not really impressed by Chinese avionics, targeting pods or precision weapons.

On Musharraf's insistence Pakistan had signed a deal for 36 J-10s in 2006 itself, but even after decade the deal hasn't come to fruition. That is because PAF is not to inclined in investing in another Chinese system, when it was only a very modest upgrade over it own Jf-17s.

But now most likely they won't choice anymore.
Most Indians prefer PAF stick with F16, thsts funny.
 
I don't know where to begin... first of all... Jf blk 3 will never be a 4.5 gen... in spite of upgrades... but it can serve as a good interceptor... what's the purpose of mounting 4th 5th gen fighter when the fighter is less capable than rival ones... example a Rafale would find and fire a bvr way before Jf or mig 21/27 search for a target
That would mostly depend upon the Bvr missile being used.......plus nobody said jf17 Blk 3 would be 4.5....it would be somewhat close to 4+ but with high capable missile systems which can be deployed on jf 17 Blk 3 will cover some capability gaps....refer to quwa website to gain a better understanding how jf17 was supposed to be used....
 
Hi,

Let the U S stop the sale----. Pakistan must increase the production of nuclear weapons by at least a 1000%.

So if the U S wants to cut off the conventional power base---no problem---let us increase the nuclear threshold---o_O.

The U S senators think that they got us by the ball joints---that is fine---let us increase the threshold---let us take the number of nuclear weapons to 500 at least---and let us start serious production of ICBM's---and other missile systems---:o:.

If the U S wants to play the game---that is fine----two can play it better---. Let us see who blinks first.
Hi it won't be good for the regional and global peace but you got to do something to defend your nation in this hostile world.
 
Why you block F16 sale to Pakistan by lobbying USA senator?
Because we are enemies
Because we want to save our money just like UK did with Argentina in case of gripen

Btw I am loving this blackmailing thing
 
Why you block F16 sale to Pakistan by lobbying USA senator?

Because it is in India's interest, that Pakistan does not any more receive high tech aircrafts, that would be ultimately used against India.
 
Who said that? Republicans emancipated blacks when democrats wanted them to serve the massas few more centuries under their boot. Republicans had a black nominee, Republicans are hugely powerful down south which has a large proportion of black voters. There is a misconception going around Republicans and blacks.

Republicans hated Obama for what he stood for namely Gun Control, LGBT rights, pro-choice, pro labour, anti-rich in short the complete nightmare when he stood for office. It is another matter he moved right of left once he was in office. Hillary to start with is much more centre and likely to remain so.

@MilSpec @Oscar do you disagree
I do, today's republicans are nothing close to the Republicans that ended slavery. Today republicans are a clear reflection of zenophobic trump and bigoted evil ted cruz.
 
I do, today's republicans are nothing close to the Republicans that ended slavery. Today republicans are a clear reflection of zenophobic trump and bigoted evil ted cruz.

It was economics back then, and economics now, plain and simple, whether abolishing slavery or making more nuclear weapons.
 
Because it is in India's interest, that Pakistan does not any more receive high tech aircrafts, that would be ultimately used against India.

At least you're being honest. Ultimately Pakistan will eventually receive 5th generation fighters from China. Can india stop that? F16 procurement was soon coming to an end for us anyway.
 
I do, today's republicans are nothing close to the Republicans that ended slavery. Today republicans are a clear reflection of zenophobic trump and bigoted evil ted cruz.

Couple of questions

1. Why is all of south mostly red? Despite having greater pop of blacks as compared to blue states
2. While I agree republicans are conservative but conservatism and racism do not necessarily overlap do they?

Original republican values as espoused by sane republicans likes of McCain, Romney etc stand for smaller govt, lesser taxes, strong military, less regulation and literal interpretation of constitution of United States. Bigotry and likes of tea party values are temporary fads and Trump is something else entirely. He is as much a democrat as a republican and took the fractured playground of republican primaries as platform for his candidacy as Hillary was too tough an opponent on the democratic side.
 
Hi,

Let the U S stop the sale----. Pakistan must increase the production of nuclear weapons by at least a 1000%.

So if the U S wants to cut off the conventional power base---no problem---let us increase the nuclear threshold---o_O.

The U S senators think that they got us by the ball joints---that is fine---let us increase the threshold---let us take the number of nuclear weapons to 500 at least---and let us start serious production of ICBM's---and other missile systems---:o:.

If the U S wants to play the game---that is fine----two can play it better---. Let us see who blinks first.
This is a bad approach.Instead find alternate supplier or platform /This approach raises unnecessary attention to our program .I dont agree with this approach
 
Hi,

Let the U S stop the sale----. Pakistan must increase the production of nuclear weapons by at least a 1000%.

So if the U S wants to cut off the conventional power base---no problem---let us increase the nuclear threshold---o_O.

The U S senators think that they got us by the ball joints---that is fine---let us increase the threshold---let us take the number of nuclear weapons to 500 at least---and let us start serious production of ICBM's---and other missile systems---:o:.

If the U S wants to play the game---that is fine----two can play it better---. Let us see who blinks first.

We must have to put tax on NATO Containers and we can easily generate 2 to 5 billion annual in terms of Taxes and road damages
 
Who knows, behavior like this by USA and West could open the gates for J20 in Pakistan and other Russian toys.
I am waiting for the day Pakistan anounces it will not buy anything defence related other than china and Russia.

I wish - and if really happen i will Perform 2 Raqa'at Nafil insha Allah.
Finally the time comes to move away from US. and just keep the fingers cross cox our politician's and many more are still licking angrezy shoes.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom