What's new

Pakistan government to betray all, Resumption of Nato Supplies by May 17!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe I read wrong but it seems to me they are going to have a meeting in which they decide what to do. Its not like they have announced that they are opening the supplies?

Sent from my BlackBerry 9900 using Tapatalk
 
Yes, but nothing in international geopolitics is ever static. Whatever geopolitics and interests that have emerged today cannot be wished away by a simple "reset" as easily as that.

It is a mistake then. These are fundamentals of humanity's growth and prosperity. We cannot keep pretending to be saving humanity by conveniently forgetting as per our interests what it entails to be human.

If your nation would for once leave its totalitarian or lets say maximalist views you will see many are ready to meet you more than half way. In such situations you should be thankful and show some appreciation for it. But to err on the side of self-interests alone (at the expense of key crucial interests of the other) would bring you resistance.

We are people too dammit, stop talking down on us. This throne you are claiming, this levels of obedience out of us, is akin to the mistakes once done by the Pharaohs. It didn't work for them, it won't for you either.

Maybe I read wrong but it seems to me they are going to have a meeting in which they decide what to do. Its not like they have announced that they are opening the supplies?

Sent from my BlackBerry 9900 using Tapatalk

Its rumored May 17 in other news.
 
It is a mistake then. These are fundamentals of humanity's growth and prosperity. We cannot keep pretending to be saving humanity by conveniently forgetting as per our interests what it entails to be human.............

Despite the fundamentals being the same, humanity's growth and prosperity has always been very uneven. The present day era is no exception to that.
 
4j6m40.jpg
From his turban ..He reali looks like a sikh cuz Muslims don't wear turban like that and the Turban style is Un-Islamic as well......:smokin:
 
From his turban ..He reali looks like a sikh cuz Muslims don't wear turban like that and the Turban style is Un-Islamic as well......:smokin:

Is Cheng Qadiani out of interest?
 
7189852572_250d7869bf_s.jpg


Chang please stop defending American wrong policies.
 
feel sorry for ppp ... on the right temple NATO is pointing a gun on the left the pakistani military .... they are cant move left or right , What would you do members ???

Last time i checked, the decision to block nato supplies until OUR DEMANDS are met, was passed in PARLIAMENT with the support of all parties including MQM. You are just behaving like Mqm, jo Hawa ka rukh dekh ker apna qibla bhe change ker leytay hey wo.

Is Cheng Qadiani out of interest?

I strongly suspect he is mansoor ijaaz. The way he initially told his history, how he knew our nuclear scientists, how we was forced to move out from Pakistan, How he knew inner news of american administration, is all similar to Mansoor Ijaz Biography
 
Pakistan, US near a ‘deal’
By: Maqbool Malik | May 14, 2012
ISLAMABAD - The US and Pakistan achieved significant progress in the exhaustive weekend talks, sparking speculations Nato would invite Pakistan to Chicago Conference in return for country’s pledge to reopen ground supply routes of the western military alliance.

Diplomatic sources told The Nation both sides achieved appreciable success in Sunday’s interaction at the forum of Pak-Afghan-Isaf Trilateral Commission and on its sidelines.

In a sign of easing tensions, the meeting came almost six months after US airstrikes killed 24 Pakistani soldiers, prompting the country to take retaliatory measures, including suspension of vital ground supplies of the Nato forces.

US General John Allen, Pakistani army chief General Ashfaq Kayani and Afghan army chief General Sher Muhammad Karimi led their respective delegations at the trilateral military moot, primarily aimed at solving border management and coordination issues.

Apart from talks between the Gen Kiyani and Isaf commander Gen John Allen, US technical teams remained busy in talks with their Pakistani counterparts to work out the nitty-gritty of the potential deal Pakistan and Nato are struggling to conclude.

Pakistan’s ambassador Sherry Rehman was also busy with senior officials of the US State Department to achieve some grounds to move forward, while Pakistan is also pursuing an indirect diplomatic path through the United Kingdom in breaking the impasse in ties with US.

Unconfirmed reports said Nato has agreed to send formal invitation to Pakistan for participation in the Chicago Conference that would discuss US and Nato’s forces draw down plans.

This would follow Pakistan’s opening of Nato land supply routes to Afghanistan, paving way for a deeper Pak-US engagement to reset their ties.


Sources were of the view that the US could provide Pakistan with more than $1 billion, which Islamabad badly needs for country’s national budget for the year 2012-2013.

Pakistan government has been saying that it would revisit bilateral ties in the light of parliamentary recommendations, calling for halt to drone attacks and an unconditional US apology over Salala boderposts attacks.But the US has not been forthcoming on both these fronts.

“US respects the parliamentary recommendations but it is entirely up to the President Obama’s Administration to decide which one of them was acceptable for mutual benefit and which one not”, a US diplomat said.

The US Embassy spokesman Mark Stroh remarked that good thing is that both sides were still talking to each other to reach a conclusion.

Sources within the European diplomatic missions in Islamabad also sounded upbeat that serious talks were underway to break the ice between Pakistan and United States and that Pakistan would most likely be invited to the two-day Nato Summit on May 20-21.

They were hopeful that Pakistan’s Defence Committee of Cabinet would decide to reopen Nato’s ground supplies in its Tuesday’s meeting. According to informed sources, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani during his visit to the United Kingdom had also given such indications to the senior British government officials.

In an official response, ISPR said about the Trilateral Commission meeting: “Talks focused on border control measures, and mechanisms put in place to avoid untoward incidents on both sides of the Pak-Afghan Border.”

On Saturday General Allen held preliminary talks with General Kayani on how to improve security in volatile areas bordering the two countries. The talks are the most significant Pakistan has hosted with the international military alliance and the Afghan military for nearly a year.After Monday’s sessions Gen Allen said he was “very encouraged” by the talks.

“There was agreement these meetings are important to achieving continued progress toward... a peaceful Afghanistan so that Afghanistan can no longer be a safe haven for terrorists,” Allen said, according to an Isaf statement.
http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/national/14-May-2012/pakistan-us-near-a-deal
 
Where is our national ghairat?
Where are our Ummah brothers??
now none of the PDF mullah brigade will show up here but they will curse pak army whole heartily for cooperating with the infidels...very funny!
 
Where is our national ghairat?
Where are our Ummah brothers??
now none of the PDF mullah brigade will show up here but they will curse pak army whole heartily for cooperating with the infidels...very funny!

More importantly where is People of Pakistan and Parliament of Pakistan? PM Gillani going to ditch Parliament once again?
 
i expect our govt to open supplies but we have to resist. We are not going to die without american aid.
 
Back to square one, and ever things starts all over again.

Coming next (like last time)

1) more drones kills

2) At least one attack on Pakistani soldiers

3) under the table diplomacy

4) Under the table government and politicians telling US we will make statements against you for public consumption, please do not take it seriously

5) Everything cools down

6) An agreement is made again

7) Back to point one
 
i expect our govt to open supplies but we have to resist. We are not going to die without american aid.

That "we' definitely does not include politicians and the governments.

The politicians and the people in government will die will without that money, and in our country the first and final say is always for the politicians and governments not the common man.

If the common man had a place in the nation, then they (the politicians and governments) would not be talking again and again that constitution says this and constitution says that for the sake of getting the chairs. Instead they would be saying constitution says this for the common man and constitution says that for the common man.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom