One has to remember that despite having very different ideas on how to achieve something and unproven speculations of fringe motivations accorded to each sides, the goals of America and Pakistan align on more things on the WoT than differ.
Pakistan views Talibanistic thought as an enemy, we in Pakistan love our culture, our modernism and the certain liberties that it accords us that won't be compatible with someone so backward as Taliban. We don't necessarily militarily oppose Taliban due to lack of resources, potential of benefit in keeping India out of Afghanistan, but we oppose them in every other way. Remember we didn't join the war without thinking that this would mean an end to the future of Taliban as it existed way back in the 90s. We wanted it. Let's be clear on that, not even 1% of Pakistanis would want the type of country where the religious police mandates the kind of life that is associated with living under the Taliban.
We didn't want it ever for Afghanistan either.
Now military aspects are of course different. The war has unfortunately brought in a very narrow minded people to power in Afghanistan who cannot separate the military aspect of our support to the Taliban as a counter measure to India, and our moral and ethical disapproval of them. With much regret, the Americans and the Afghans are over stretching our association with them and ignoring that if India was removed from this equation our one and only goal would be to remove the Taliban as well. We played our part very well for the first 5 years when Indian meddling wasn't that high. It quickly changed as the war effort suddenly saw the emergence of a militant organization as the BLA.
India is a part of it, due to the narrow mindedness of both Americans and the Afghan people. They are even promoting India's meddling and covering for them. There are petty gains for them in doing so, none of which relate to this war effort.
There is some internal schizophrenia within the American way of thinking. Either they can win this war on terror by supporting Pakistan's only wish to not have India give militant support within Pakistan or they can prop up India as a countermeasure to China.
We need to be clear, that in all other cases, we support the United States as its goals do not differ from us. By closing the supply route to them we hurt the war effort which ultimately hurts one of our goals. On our part we believe (with good reason) that this terrorism problem can be handled through diplomatic channels with the Taliban groups. Many non-aggression pacts have been holding for several years now. But that doesn't mean if given the chance we wouldn't spread modern civilization to the Taliban groups and their controlled areas. We don't like their culture, their Islamist ideals. We stand by our ideals, which are very similar to the average American.
As a two people who have been victims of poor decision making, and a vicious cycle of one-upmanship and subtle manipulations, we have to wise up to this and wise up to revising our relationship. As a first step America must open the way, it has to try to make things workable between us.
It apologizes, we open the route.
It moves against Indians, we move against Haqqanis.
The future must be looked as the future of the war that was started, not the geopolitics and interests of the US and Pakistan that have emerged today. From how things were and felt 10 years ago, we still believe in those same causes.
Tell me Cheng do you have some standard set lines that are relatively meaningless and can be used in lots of threads?
Best government of Pakistan 
