What's new

PAF J-10C News, Updates and Discussion

.
What will this jet add to PAF what advantage does it have that JF-17 doesn't?

J10C with WS10B TVC showed what a marvel of modern engineering it was at the Zhuhai airshow in 2018

it showed Chinese engineering had reached the best Western counter parts

PAF pilots will love the TVC on this aircraft
 
. .
Come on guys, JF-17 is one of the few aircraft which visited India in recent times.

FB_IMG_1640800201468.jpg
 
. .
🤭

PAF need something like Su35 or j-16
The only thing we need now is to build inventory of JF-17 BIII and J-10C. After that we need Azm or J-31 or TFX.

However, if quantum radars mature then 5th gen will be relegated to 4.5+ gen.
 
Last edited:
. .
@Rafi Is there any possibility that CATIC can help us in AZM if we bought J10C in large number?
If we are going to purchase 5 sq. of it, then why not put Raad 2 on it instead of spending dollars on A2G package?

Azm custom built joint fighter with some indigenous condiments including chilli sauce and mayo.
 
. .
paf need front line fighters more then 120 sir . just look our f-16 orders . but i agree we can not afford more then 120 . as of now first flight will be in 2030 and induction will be 2037-40

i think any Chinese 5th gen even 36 of them were great threat to our enemy . rather then j-10 .
Fully agreed but the PLAAF has a huge internal demand. Secondly it has said that currently it will not export J20. J31/35 is not reaxy, nor is TFX. You cannot get F16s from the US , THEY WILL NOT LET YOU SMELL THE EXHAUST OF THE 35. The Russian fighter is not ready and I dont think our own fighter will be ready before mid 30s.
On the other hand both PGs and Mirages( the nonupgraded ones) need replacing. We can only produce 12 JFTs a year so where do we go and what do/we do?
It is a pragmatic decision and whereas I think had the US door been open we would not have looked towards theJ10 (as we have vast experience of maintaining/flying the platform), under the current circumstances it is the best option open to us.
A
 
. . .
Also, it might have skipped through the minds of many here but, less is seen in regard to advance and modern weapon procurement like F-16 or J-10.

Taking over the command of balancing geostrategic equation and replacing a power with more influence having control to hold the region together and with equal military power balance.

Does anyone try to understand that? US always vouch and sold weapons only as per needed power balance and keeping the influence over certain parties in the region while controlling the escalation tech. We have seen it before and that too, it was kept balanced by Pakistan. Whether USSR in Afghanistan or post Afghan war, Pakistan emerges as the regional king maker.

A fact and bit of harsh reality which is more of a truth to say that US will have hard time to forget instead of people saying that PAF is obsessed and F-16 boys wouldn't let it go. Ultimately, Pakistan is the one balancing regional conventional power by keeping ahead of only warmongering PM in East. Eventually and not to surprise, China has taken over the role of balancing the regional theater by way of weapon sale and so the economic practice. The geostrategic balance command is shifted to China and who's the key here.... Pakistan.

This fact alone hitting hard or might be hard for Viper producing and blocking Country.

China is now replacing US in this regard and the show has just begun. It's not just about J-10C but that command to control and balance regional strategic games. The most sensitive and advance tech, aka J-10 is nothing less than those Vipers in 80s for PAF. Game changing and so the geostrategic referee. For US, holding back onto something such as Viper and some other stuff believing into submission by Pakistan, was the least wrong move and apparently lost it.

What's next then? Drums of unrest and chaotic situation so that Pakistan, China and Russia be affected. Pakistan could be the first Target since only Muslim nuclear power and with unsustainable economy till now.

Game rules changing and so the game itself.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom