FOOLS_NIGHTMARE
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2018
- Messages
- 18,063
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Yep, but with a powerful AESA radar, powerful engine, more hardpoints, more weapon varieties and better avionics.It kind of looks like an f16
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, but with a powerful AESA radar, powerful engine, more hardpoints, more weapon varieties and better avionics.It kind of looks like an f16
Additionally - does this mean that the new J10C's have pure chinese ejection seats and not the Martin Baker ones? No new contract was announced for 35(36) units etc.
I wonder if the initial order includes any 2-seaters?
Hate to pop your bubble but stealth needs to be designed from the ground up. According to the J-20 designer even something as small as a rivet has to be taken into account. Does the J-10P have reduced RCS? Definitely. Is it stealth? No.
Without going into the nitty gritty of it, with due respect I would disagree with you on this. I fully agree that the source needs to agree to share the photos on open forum. However the cat is out of the bag and it has been confirmed by Sheeda telli who is a Pindi boy anx close to establishment.Any breach of security might lead to perma ban. If you have anything for your own information; do not violate the trust of source then. Any pic/detail might be shared if the Source allows and agrees to do so on purpose permitted officially, without harming Op-Sec/Military Info.
Regards,
I think the question is if the J10CP is more stealthy than the J10A then the answer is yes, it is more stealthy via reduced RCS meaning it will take longer to show up on enemy radar also meaning the chances of it seeing the enemy first increases.
Yes we have.I get that but I was asking on the lines since PAF has participated with and against the likes of F-22. Considering the relationship between the two sides I was curious to know if we ever participated against the J-20 or in conjunction against mutual threats.
Then you need to ask yourself this question why China never inducted the JF-17 if its capabilities are matching to J-10 or near on par.I am one of the nay sayers. We all said it did not make sense to us as to why PAF needed another 4.5generation platform in the presence of block 3 which has not (officially) been inducted. We could not work out the need for such a platform especially in our resource constained environment. None of us would be unhappy to be proven wrong and as long as PAF has chosen the J10 due to its capabilities we would be very happy for PAF and Pakistan. Disagreement was based on logic rather than any grudge against the platform .
However, since the picture of Haseeb Paracha in Chinese platform emerged 2-3 years ago, Sir Bilalkhan 777 said he saw both J10 and J11/16 in PAF. This to me was the earliest confirmation as far as Iam concerned although other posters have since pointed to arrival in first quarter of 22.
A
Somehow this news is not very exciting to me. I was hoping we would not see this jet in PAF colors ever as it's procurement bellies other serious issues (failures) in Pakistan. Either way, the one upside is pilots won't be flying 1960 era old jetsYou mean the very ones who claimed that PAF rejected the J-10...
If there are it would be J-10S, which is based on the J-10A. I’m not aware of any upgrades two seaters. However, there is a possibility that the J-10D might be a twin seater EW bird based on the J-10C. That’s just a rumor right now so don’t take my word for it.
Simple it's a light Wright fighter and look at what China's requirements are and their enemies.Then you need to ask yourself this question why China never inducted the JF-17 if its capabilities are matching to J-10 or near on par.
Not to mention ,JF-17 and J-10 are both design by China. There is no better authority than China to gauge which is better and the very reason why PLAAF induct J-10 only.
He is photographer and one of pic of JF-17 with REK (or Turkish Targeting pod) was his work. I think he has shahre some of his clicks at plane spotter as well
@TNT
burnol bhaijoon.Ohhhh Is it? Best of luck for that. We will know it in 3 months.
Then you need to ask yourself this question why China never inducted the JF-17 if its capabilities are matching to J-10 or near on par.
Not to mention ,JF-17 and J-10 are both design by China. There is no better authority than China to gauge which is better and the very reason why PLAAF induct J-10 only.
J-11B was pitched to PAF as well. I think PAF is happy with the capability of J-10C's engine and it's bvr. Especially after the news that PLAAF has removed flankers from Taiwan zone and have places J-10s
J-11 or a similar flanker.