What's new

On How to DELETE Israel

Muslim insurgency is long lasting

The crusaders said the same things but after 100 years of constant harassment they were defeated and destroyed

in Israel the muslim population will soon exceed the jews in Gaza/WB/israel and will keep rising

These things are not decided over a few years or decade's we don't forget an enemy


Power comes and goes the muslim world is hugh and power will return and when it does combined with our massive population our enemies will pay (just the reality)



The original jews were middle eastern hebrews not polish like netenyaho or moldovan like their FM

white jews turning up in the middle east pretending to be more middle eastern then the middle easterners is a joke

a sick colonial joke


This is why they have gotten no peace, will get no peace and will be harassed continuesly whilst the muslim population grows in the land they covet
If Mongoloid, African or Caucasian looking people can claim to be Arabs, why cannot Jews look Caucasian, that too when they have lived in Europe over 20 centuries??
 
.
Like I said power come and goes

The only guarantee is that there is no guarantee

Great empires crumble and tiny states become great empire's

Like I said the Muslim world is enormous and heading towards 2 billion population

and at some point there will be an awakening of the massive latent power of the Muslim world, now combine this with an enormous international population and slowly we will tip the balance against Israel, Myanmar etc

There's no point in giving up, keep the fires burning

Basics are wrong, Muslims in a large enough number create conflict with others, and when others arent available then create conflict among themselves.

The only direction that muslims are heading towards is the caliphate and your calipha in Iraq to which all, including Indian sunnis are falling prey to. The whole muslim world is getting engulfed in this.
 
.
If Mongoloid, African or Caucasian looking people can claim to be Arabs, why cannot Jews look Caucasian, that too when they have lived in Europe over 20 centuries??

These are Crimean arian people not semites who converted to judaism 3-4 centuries back.
 
.
There are more Arabs live in Israel controlled territory than Israeli Jews. Its just a matter of time when Israel had to give up the idea of a jewish state.

Basics are wrong, Muslims in a large enough number create conflict with others, and when others arent available then create conflict among themselves.

The only direction that muslims are heading towards is the caliphate and your calipha in Iraq to which all, including Indian sunnis are falling prey to. The whole muslim world is getting engulfed in this.

You probably working with wrong data and numbers.
 
.
There are more Arabs live in Israel controlled territory than Israeli Jews. Its just a matter of time when Israel had to give up the idea of a jewish state.



You probably working with wrong data and numbers.

I am talking of the general trend that is on display - muslims have a conflict with everyone - jews, christians, buddhists, hindus, Confusian, orthodox, conservative, liberal, gay, atheist, secular, democratic - and even among themselves.
 
.
I am talking of the general trend that is on display - muslims have a conflict with everyone - jews, christians, buddhists, hindus, Confusian, orthodox, conservative, liberal, gay, atheist, secular, democratic - and even among themselves.

It is mutual. Muslim has 56 countries controls huge swath of land including 1.6 billion people. So probability of getting into contacts and conflict with other is higher. Yet Muslim has no record like Hitlers, Khemr-rooze, Hiroshima. Muslim even protected whole Indian Hindus for almost a millennium.

Besides Muslim are not submissive like Hindus and can not recognize masters.
 
.
It is mutual. Muslim has 56 countries controls huge swath of land including 1.6 billion people. So probability of getting into contacts and conflict with other is higher. Yet Muslim has no record like Hitlers, Khemr-rooze, Hiroshima. Muslim even protected whole Indian Hindus for almost a millennium.

Besides Muslim are not submissive like Hindus and can not recognize masters.

Muslims protected Hindus in India - how? by aligning themselves with the british and joining their army and opposing independence?

I am talking about the basic tenet of Islam that is intolerent towards everything else other than Islam.
 
.
Muslims protected Hindus in India - how? by aligning themselves with the british and joining their army and opposing independence?

I am talking about the basic tenet of Islam that is intolerent towards everything else other than Islam.

You dont know basic trend of Islam. Borders were imposed upon Muslim in middle east by the Brits after ottoman empire. So until redrawn and full democracy in place there will still be some resistance here and there.
Besides, its the other way around. All other religion are intolerant against Muslim. Its due to the strong moral code of conduct Islam impose on its follower which put them in superior position. ;)
 
.
You dont know basic trend of Islam. Borders were imposed upon Muslim in middle east by the Brits after ottoman empire. So until redrawn and full democracy in place there will still be some resistance here and there.
Besides, its the other way around. All other religion are intolerant against Muslim. Its due to the strong moral code of conduct Islam impose on its follower which put them in superior position. ;)

Superior to whom? superior in what way? what superior position does the muslim world have - other than oil.

Have you figured out why all other religions are intolerent to Islam? Have you figured out why all other way of life is intolerent to Islam? buddhists are supposedly the most peaceful religion - even they having a conflict, notwithstanding the millions of buddhists who were slaughtered by muslim hordes.
 
.
Superior to whom? superior in what way? what superior position does the muslim world have - other than oil.

Have you figured out why all other religions are intolerent to Islam? Have you figured out why all other way of life is intolerent to Islam? buddhists are supposedly the most peaceful religion - even they having a conflict, notwithstanding the millions of buddhists who were slaughtered by muslim hordes.

That makes all our post just cowshit...
 
. .
Muslims protected Hindus in India - how? by aligning themselves with the british and joining their army and opposing independence?

.


Hon Sir,

This is an incorrect Statement.

For the record following Muslims had been president of the Indian National Congress.

Badruddin Tayabji 1887, Rahimtulla M Sayani 1896, Syed Hasan Imam 1918, Hakim Ajaml Khan 1921, Mohammad Ali Jauhar 1923, Abul Kalam Azad 1923, Mukhtar Ahmed Ansari 1927, Abul Kalam Azad again 1940 to 1946.

Muslims did not oppose independence. Indian National Congress always had a large number of Muslim members. Quaid -e Azam Mohammed Ali Jinnah himself was a prominent member of Congress for 15 years and resigned in 1920.

There were also very large number of Hindus in the British Indian Army. Number of Sikhs far exceeded proportion of their population. Mahatma Gandhi himself helped recruitment of Indian soldiers for the British Army during WW1. Kindly look into the number of Hindu/Sikh soldiers in the Indian Army at the time of partition and you will know the truth.

Genuine criticism is always welcome, but it is insulting my intelligence when people use ‘Untruths’ to support their argument.
 
.
Genuine criticism is always welcome, but it is insulting my intelligence when people use ‘Untruths’ to support their argument.

My statement was correct for the most part with the exception of the few you quoted which doesnt take away much - the untruth is in the quote that I replied to and that is Muslims protected Hindus, Muslim leaders liked the British more than the Hindu leaders.
 
.
I would beg to restate that Muslims of the subcontinent were as much a part of the independence movement as the Hindus and fought against the British along side their Hindu compatriots. Muslims did not joined British against independence.

Let me remind your honourable self that the Indians who sided with the British in 1857 war of Independence were the Sikhs not Muslims. No doubt Marathas gave the the toughest fight to the East Company, but Sirajud -Daulah, Shah Alam II ( as the prince Ali Gauhar at Buxor) and Tipu Sultan also resisted British occupation to the best of their ability.

Additionally, I have seen movies and articles on Mangal Panday - no doubt a true hero and respected son of the soil; but very little mention of Dewan Azimullah Khan Yusufzai who played an active role in fight against the British with the forces of Nana Sahib.

Admittedly Hindus were in forefront of the anti colonial struggle. I only wish to stress that Muslims also played their part. That is why I disagree with your assertion " by aligning themselves with the british and joining their army and opposing independence?"

Azimullah Khan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom