Imran Khan
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 68,815
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
ghantaMilestone kya hai?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ghantaMilestone kya hai?
ghanta
What a logic , if its like that why don't we just put JFT as one & the last platform in PAF ?Sir it is not just sanctions fee (to some extent -- not happy with the power plant situation) but performance is better than the fleet it is replacing. PAF is doing a lot of mix and match with Mirage III, IV, F-7, and F-7PG.
With the intro of JFT, mix and match will be drastically reduced, training will be easier, logistics will be more economical, a single platform will do which was being done with four different types of platforms!!
What a logic , if its like that why don't we just put JFT as one & the last platform in PAF ?
It would be ridiculous even to think that JFT will be able to become super then all of the worlds major fighter jets & in different situations , its enough that its just giving us the force multipilyers & is sufficient within our domestic needs ?
No doubt its has covered a lot of ground , but as effective fighting flying force we need , mix of different fighter jets for different situations .
The mindset of easy is making PAF less effective than it should be, who said that defending skies can be easy in Pakistan. If it easy then we are missing something, I am starting to get worried that if this is how the decision makers think in PAF. Hope this policy/state of mind changes. I do appreciate the financial constraints. As a ground support and Maritime role my money is on Mirage V with a lot of constraints yet better than JF17. Unfortunately the aircrafts are old and JF 17 maybe just able to do that role but I am very uncertain that they will be able to fill that role any time soon. It is good to have JF17 but thinking it can do everything is downright wishful thinking. Now I am saying this as an outsider with limited knowledge.Sir it is not just sanctions fee (to some extent -- not happy with the power plant situation) but performance is better than the fleet it is replacing. PAF is doing a lot of mix and match with Mirage III, IV, F-7, and F-7PG.
With the intro of JFT, mix and match will be drastically reduced, training will be easier, logistics will be more economical, a single platform will do which was being done with four different types of platforms!!
Gripen, SUs and F-18 etc ... I would suggest them to take a look at the first ever jets manufactured by those respective countries.
JF17 will evolve but can do so much as a single engine light aircraft.Well, to all those who are saying JF-17 Thunder is not that good, has no place in modern warfare or cannot be compared to any of those Gripen, SUs and F-18 etc ... I would suggest them to take a look at the first ever jets manufactured by those respective countries.
Pakistan aeronautical complex makes aircraftAoA
PAF is the only Airforce in the world that makes aircrafts.
Regards
JF17 will evolve but can do so much as a single engine light aircraft.
Not a good example Bro ......the JF-17 wont be fighting the MiG-1, Saab 29 Tunnan or the Wright brothers Flyer 1
Did I ever say that? What I meant is this is Pakistan's first ever manufactured jet, there will be improvements, mega improvements in the futur
Pakistan aeronautical complex makes aircraft
I've been following you for some time now and I agree with you on some matters if not all of them. My question is, shouldn't a nation invest in reinventing the wheel? it takes time, money and effort, yes but this single investment will bear fruits for decades. The knowledge gained from personal experience is far better than flying a ready made jet and/or assembling and maintaining it. I am a mechanical engineering student, and i specialize in design and analysis of machinery, from experience i can assure you that the knowledge gained from even the projects that do not have much commercial value or potency, one can learn and apply that knowledge to better potent machinery.Hi,
Well--it is a force multiplier from the bottom upwards----.
If paf had procured the 72 BLK 52s in 2005----this aircraft would be the perfect fill in needed to replace all those aircraft---.
The problem we are seeing is the large imbalance of power between the top tier and the bottom tier----. For tht reason you are concerned and I am concerned as so many others who do not kow tow to the ideology of the paf.
What a logic , if its like that why don't we just put JFT as one & the last platform in PAF ?
It would be ridiculous even to think that JFT will be able to become super then all of the worlds major fighter jets & in different situations , its enough that its just giving us the force multipilyers & is sufficient within our domestic needs ?
No doubt its has covered a lot of ground , but as effective fighting flying force we need , mix of different fighter jets for different situations .
the subject of this thrade itself is troll@waz please let me know why I do not have the privileges to reply on the following thread? Thank you
jf 17 has no place in modern warefre
Source: https://defence.pk/threads/jf-17-has-no-place-in-modern-warefre.407417/#ixzz3qqDKxtHJ