What's new

Iran, Airbus strike deal for 12 A-380, 16 A-350 jets

.
i wonder what destinations will the iran air a-380s fly to , i bet Thailand :lol:
 
. . .
That is.:agree:

You seem to have no clue about the company you work for.for your notice, at beginning Airbus offered to give IranAir some leased A-340s until new built aircrafts are delivered.it was rejected by IranAir anyway.I guess for now IranAir will receive some used A-330s ASAP.

Request Rejected


You have no clue what you say. That is not part of the deal. A leased airplane is not part of the building program but for spanning the timespan until the first delivery. And it is impossible for a new build craft to be delivered in next two months. A leased aircrcraft is not part of this signed deal but a seperate deal that IranAir does for itself.

you see below theres 2 a380's clearly in storage. why does those a380's not have engine weights on the engine mounts to simulate an engine mounted on the wing? i know this is done due to flex so simulate what the wing would typically endure having engines on them. but why does it not have them?

i know a while back there were reports of hairline fractures on the wing mounts. but i dont know anything more .
SkymarkA380_2.JPG


Because it is not necessary to do so. If walk there you see production aircrafts with and without engines. Storage is usually better without engines because you need less work to prepare for storage ect. The hairline fractures where a different issue

Yes, IranAir wants B737 and B777 too.negotiation has not turned final yet.


I doubt that this will pass. There is a reason Iran prefers Airbus over Boeing. There are elections in USA soon. If the republicans win the Boeing deal is in jeopardy.
 
.
Because it is not necessary to do so. If walk there you see production aircrafts with and without engines. Storage is usually better without engines because you need less work to prepare for storage ect. The hairline fractures where a different issue
well ok, i have not seen the production line nor do i intend to. tbh i prefer boeing to airbus, and the 747-8 to the a380.
no offence
 
.
but on a second thought they ll probably use the A-380s to transfer the hajjis on their pilgrimage to mecca and medina

but on a second thought they ll probably use the A-380s to transfer the hajjis on their pilgrimage to mecca and medina
 
.
well ok, i have not seen the production line nor do i intend to. tbh i prefer boeing to airbus, and the 747-8 to the a380.
no offence

You prefer the outdated machine with less efficiency, louder engines and not working tail tanks. I´m not offended by that. ;)
 
.
You have no clue what you say. That is not part of the deal. A leased airplane is not part of the building program but for spanning the timespan until the first delivery. And it is impossible for a new build craft to be delivered in next two months. A leased aircrcraft is not part of this signed deal but a seperate deal that IranAir does for itself.




Because it is not necessary to do so. If walk there you see production aircrafts with and without engines. Storage is usually better without engines because you need less work to prepare for storage ect. The hairline fractures where a different issue




I doubt that this will pass. There is a reason Iran prefers Airbus over Boeing. There are elections in USA soon. If the republicans win the Boeing deal is in jeopardy.
Thats also a deal between IranAir and Airbus.I dont care if its separated or part of the main deal.you better check that link from Airbus official website.I hope next time you will pretend to be an Airbus staff better than this.
 
.
You prefer the outdated machine with less efficiency, louder engines and not working tail tanks. I´m not offended by that. ;)
ok if you say so. just remember who pioneered composite air frames. the 747-8 burns 20% less per seat than the a380. but the a380 makes up for it in size. the engines are more efficent even the wings.

at first i liked the a380 simply due to the fact that a large part of it is british. the wings and in most cases the engines too. but now i would go for the 747-8 simply due to economics and effeciency. also how often is the a380 full to capacity?
 
. . .
Thats also a deal between IranAir and Airbus.I dont care if its separated or part of the main deal.you better check that link from Airbus official website.I hope next time you will pretend to be an Airbus staff better than this.


I´m not Airbus staff. I work for a supplier. :) beside that no its not an Airbus / IranAir deal. Its performed by 3rd parties. I should know, we install and deinstall the engines. ;)

ok if you say so. just remember who pioneered composite air frames. the 747-8 burns 20% less per seat than the a380. but the a380 makes up for it in size. the engines are more efficent even the wings.

at first i liked the a380 simply due to the fact that a large part of it is british. the wings and in most cases the engines too. but now i would go for the 747-8 simply due to economics and effeciency. also how often is the a380 full to capacity?


How often is the 747-8i ordered? ;) Its a dead horse amigo.
 
.
I´m not Airbus staff. I work for a supplier. :) beside that no its not an Airbus / IranAir deal. Its performed by 3rd parties. I should know, we install and deinstall the engines. ;)




How often is the 747-8i ordered? ;) Its a dead horse amigo.
well you can have that. but i have strange feeling in about a year oil prices are going to spike then lets see how the a380 handles it. dont get me wrong i like the a350-1000 its nicely positioned between the 777-8/9 and the 787
 
.
I´m not Airbus staff. I work for a supplier. :) beside that no its not an Airbus / IranAir deal. Its performed by 3rd parties. I should know, we install and deinstall the engines. ;)




How often is the 747-8i ordered? ;) Its a dead horse amigo.
We will see.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom