Invasion of India: Doc

[jbond197]

lol, Pakistanis your ancestors were defeated/massacred by Sikander in middle east, Saudi region before he was defeated by Indians..

Unfortunately, Indians didn't stay united in seventh century AD else Raja Dahir would have been your hero today and all the false stories against him would not have been in place..

 

[manofwar]

100% correct brother, our ancestors and not indians - who can rightly claim the Ganges based civilization as their own.

So you do claim descent from Hindu kings and the vedic hindu civilization, do you not??You agree that Islamic Pakistan is a recent idea and all it's people were hindustani for most of the history........
It's either that or you are descended from a muslim invader , in which case you can't claim the IVC and the Gangetic civilisation......
Chose either one.....

 

[Bang Galore]

Can a Tamil, Keralite, Maharashtrian, Malayalam, Gujrati, and Bengali claim the victories of Porus as his own? Porus was a Punjabi and Punjabis only make up 3% of indian population while Punjabis in Pakistan make up more than 40% of the population.

Therefore bharatis cannot claim Porus and others who defeated Alexander as their own. Porus is a Pakistani, NOT indian therefore we Pakistanis have the right to claim him.

A bit rich coming from people who both accept a religion propagated by Arabs & claim every invader as their own ! If you can do that, see no reason for others not to claim "their" history

 

[Contract Killer]

Can a Tamil, Keralite, Maharashtrian, Malayalam, Gujrati, and Bengali claim the victories of Porus as his own? Porus was a Punjabi and Punjabis only make up 3% of indian population while Punjabis in Pakistan make up more than 40% of the population.

Therefore bharatis cannot claim Porus and others who defeated Alexander as their own. Porus is a Pakistani, NOT indian therefore we Pakistanis have the right to claim him.

Lol, just going by your logic, just few post back, you guys were claiming him as Pakistani and were boasting, while you forgot that your land consists of Punjab, Baluchistan, Sindh, NWFP etc.

Will not be surprised in coming days, you guys start claiming Ashoka was urs and Mohanjodaro& Harrapa was urs too. lol.

 

[Jade]

World historians will have to accept that Pakistanis own their history and not foreigners like indians.

Then fine, let the world historians change the history first. Until that time in the eyes of world, Pakistan was not existing before 1947, so are Pakistanis.

 

[IND151]

indians never defeated Alexander, it was the ancestors of modern day Pakistanis.



There was no indian until 1947. Before that it was british occupation, and most of what is india today was nothing more than scattered independent states.

neither was Pakistan

but their was Bharatvarsha

both pakistan and India are successors to the legacy of BharatVarsha

 

[Jade]

Can a Tamil, Keralite, Maharashtrian, Malayalam, Gujrati, and Bengali claim the victories of Porus as his own? Porus was a Punjabi and Punjabis only make up 3% of indian population while Punjabis in Pakistan make up more than 40% of the population.

Therefore bharatis cannot claim Porus and others who defeated Alexander as their own. Porus is a Pakistani, NOT indian therefore we Pakistanis have the right to claim him.

Yes, a Tamil, Keralite, Maharashtrian, Malayalam, Gujrati, and Bengali claim the victories of Porus as his own. Cultures are not static so is human migration. Don't be surprised if most of the sub continent people have a over whelming common gene pool.

 

[manofwar]

indians never defeated Alexander, it was the ancestors of modern day Pakistanis.



There was no indian until 1947. Before that it was british occupation, and most of what is india today was nothing more than scattered independent states.

The concept was still there, and believe me it spanned the whole subcontinent....
The british in the words of Robert Clive, set out to conquer "Hindustan or Bharat" and not independent states........Tipu Sultan, the muslim ruler ,told his sons in a famous dialogue, that Hindustan, must be protected from the British..........
Nadir Shah set to conquer Hindustan, so did babur........
The mughal empress was titled Mallika-e-hind and not Mallika-e-Pak..........

FACE IT pakistan is a recent concept, envisioned by Jinnah.......

 

[IND151]

Correction the Great Pakistani Punjabi King, his religion is irrelevant and not important, for all you know he could have been Buddhist or even an Atheist.

but that time there was no Pakistan nor India

there was also no Islam

there was Bharatvarsha

but may be the fact that Porus was from region which is in present day Pakistan, has made him hero of Pakistanis

am i right?

 

[Contract Killer]

The Country "Pakistan" does not have any history past 70 years. Also it was founded based on religion, hence it cannot claim anything which does not belong to its reason of foundation.

History and culture of that land is well preserved by migrant of that land in India.

 

[KS]

My ancestors religion is irrelevant, just as a modern Greek does not have to know Zeus to inherit his ancient heritage.

Greece was not formed in the name of religion dude.

Pakistan was.

Apples and oranges.

 

[Vinod2070]

He would be with his people, of his region - not a Tamil that he has nothing in common with, especially linguistically.

The obsession of many of you with Tamils and Sikhs is interesting. While I have a huge respect for our Southern brothers who have always been much more cultured and civilized than those in now Pakistan, I am from former undivided Punjab.

The sohna Dharmic Punjab that fought the invaders, not sold out.

Those who sold out are no Punjabis.

 

[KS]

Can a Tamil, Keralite, Maharashtrian, Malayalam, Gujrati, and Bengali claim the victories of Porus as his own?

When Pakistanis can claim the exploits of Muhammed Bin Qasim , Ghaznavi,Khalid bin Waled, all those arab caliphs based on religion, why not Indians who have a far more authentic claim ?

 

[SamantK]

The Country "Pakistan" does not have any history past 70 years. Also it was founded based on religion, hence it cannot claim anything which does not belong to its reason of foundation.

History and culture of that land is well preserved by migrant of that land in India.

You know the most funny part? Its that these guys think that fright from the IVC era, those guys did not move and eventually became Pakistanis..

 

[Rafi]

LoL at the indians trying to associate themselves with Pakistani history, says a lot about the history of modern india, how barren and without glory it must be. Pretty sad if you ask me.